Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 9–13

Intraductal approach to the detection of intraductal lesions of the breast

  • Tadaharu Matsunaga
  • Takeharu Misaka
  • Katsumasa Hosokawa
  • Shinichiro Taira
  • Kyeongil Kim
  • Hiromi Serizawa
  • Hutoshi Akiyama
  • Masahiko Fujii
Preclinical Study

Abstract

Bloody nipple discharge is a clue in the detection of ductal carcinoma of the breast that do not display a mass. Since sensitivity of discharge cytology is not sufficiently high and mammary ductendoscopy (MS) contributes to the diagnosis of intraductal lesions. We set out to determine whether the intraductal approach is effective for detection of ductal carcinoma. We performed 445 MS procedure in 323 patients who had nipple discharge but no overt mass. The diagnostic accuracy rates of discharge cytology and intraductal breast biopsy (IDBB) were studied in detecting malignancy. The therapeutic value of IDBB for intraductal papillomas was studied in 73 patients. Out of 323 patients, 80 had breast cancer and 155 had intraductal papilloma. MS detected intraductal tumors in 47 cases (58.8%). IDBB was performed in 35 of these 47 cases. The sensitivity was 37.1% by touch cytology, 68.6% by IDBB, and 82.8% by directed ductal lavage cytology. Of the 73 intraductal papilloma patients who were followed for more than 3 years, the therapeutic effectiveness of IDBB was recognized in 57 (78.1%). Directed ductal lavage cytology was the most sensitive method in detecting malignancy. MS and IDBB were benefit in the treatment of intraductal papilloma.

Keywords

Breast cancer Nipple discharge Lavage cytology Ductal cancer Intraductal papilloma 

References

  1. 1.
    Teboul M (1988) A new concept in breast investigation: echo-histological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. Biomed Pharmacother 42:282–296Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Namba K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Makita M, Sugano H, Kasumi H et al (1989) Intraductal biopsy of the breast (IDBB) for intraductal lesions: a case of breast cancer diagnosed by IDBB. Jpn J Breast Cancer 4:253–258Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makita M, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Namba K, Sugano H, Kasumi F et al (1991) Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18:179–188. doi:10.1007/BF01990034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, Satoh H, Watanabe Y, Mikami T et al (1991) Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21:188–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berna J, Garcia-Medina V, Kuni C (1991) Ductoscopy: a new technique ductal exploration. Eur J Radiol 12:127–129. doi:10.1016/0720-048X(91)90112-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagase J, Endo M (1995) Endoscopic biopsy in the intraductal lesions of the breast for the mammary duct fiberscope. Jpn J Breast Cancer 10:405–409Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Love SM, Barsky SH (1996) Breast-duct endoscopy to study stages of cancerous breast disease. Lancet 348:997–999. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)04145-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen KW, Jiong Wu, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Shao ZM, Barsky SH (2000) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 89:1512–1519. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1512::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-LCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamamoto D, Shoji T, Kawanishi H, Nakagawa H, Haijima H, Gondo H et al (2001) A utility of ductography and fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70:103–108. doi:10.1023/A:1012990809466 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misaka T, Hosokawa K, Fujii M, Nakayama S et al (2001) Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer 8:213–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsunaga T, Kawakami Y, Namba K, Fujii M (2004) Intraductal biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Cancer 101:2164–2169. doi:10.1002/cncr.20657 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dooley WC (2002) Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 9:920–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dooley WC (2003) Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA (2002) Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery 132:582–587. doi:10.1067/msy.2002.127672 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarakbi WA, Salhab M, Mokbel K (2006) Does mammary ductoscopy have a role in clinical practice? Int Semin Surg Oncol 3:16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, Prindiville SA, Palmieri D, Simon R, Ried T, Steeg PS (2006) Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 94:555–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Escobar PF, Crowe JP, Matsunaga T, Mokbel K (2006) The clinical applications of mammary ductoscopy. Am J Surg 191:211–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mokbel K, Escobar PF, Matsunaga T (2005) Mammary ductoscopy: current status and future prospects. Eur J Surg Oncol 331:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhi-Ming S, Mai N (2001) Nipple aspiration in diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 20:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, Cazzaniga M, Elledge RM, O’Shaughnessy JA, Kuerer HM, Hung DT, Khan SA, Philips RF, Ganz PA, Euhus DM, Esserman LJ, Haffty BG, King BL, Kelly MC, Anderson MM, Schmit PJ, Clark RR, Kass FC, Anderson BO, Troyan SL, Arias RD, Quiring JN, Love SM, Page DL, King EB (2001) Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in woman at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1624–1632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ljung BM, Chew L, Moore DH II, King EB (2004) Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 30:143–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, Miike R, Mason L, Chew KL, Lee MM, Emster VL, Hilton JF, Schweitzer R, Goodson WH III, Hunt TK (1992) Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol 135:130–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, Miike R, King EB, Chew K, Neuhaus J, Lee MM, Rhys M (2001) Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1791–1798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadaharu Matsunaga
    • 1
  • Takeharu Misaka
    • 1
  • Katsumasa Hosokawa
    • 1
  • Shinichiro Taira
    • 1
  • Kyeongil Kim
    • 1
  • Hiromi Serizawa
    • 2
  • Hutoshi Akiyama
    • 3
  • Masahiko Fujii
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Breast DiseasesTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of PathologyTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of PathologyCancer Institute HospitalTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of PathologyKyorin University School of Health ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations