Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 110, Issue 1, pp 51–55

Risk of needle tract seeding of breast cancer: cytological results derived from core wash material

Preclinical Study

Abstract

Needle track seeding has been recognized as a possible, albeit rare, complication of breast core needle biopsy. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of needle tract seeding of breast cancer from cytological results derived from core needle wash material. The study included biopsies of 207 breast cancers performed using ultrasonographically guided 18-gauge core needles. Each core needle without exposed sample notch was washed in saline solution immediately after removing the needles. Cytology derived from core wash material was performed by saline solution lavage of the fragments using a cytocentrifuge. The cytological diagnoses were divided into five categories: benign, atypical/indeterminate, suspicious/probably malignant, malignant and unsatisfactory. Atypical/indeterminate, suspicious/probably malignant and malignant categories were considered to represent positive cases of needle track seeding of breast cancer, whereas benign and unsatisfactory categories were counted as negative cases. Cytological diagnoses of the 207 lesions were as follows: 26 lesions (12%) were benign, 18 lesions (9%) were atypical/indeterminate, 37 lesions (18%) were suspicious/probably malignant, 79 lesions (38%) were malignant, and 47 lesions (23%) were unsatisfactory. The incidence of positive cases of cytology derived from core wash material was 65% (134/207). The 25% frequency of positive cases of invasive lobular carcinoma was significantly lower than the frequencies of DCIS (74%) and invasive ductal carcinoma (69%) (P = 0.001 and P < 0.01). The frequency of positive cases in the multiple passes group was 75%, which was slightly, although not significantly, higher than the 66% frequency in the single pass group (P = 0.3). In conclusion, the incidence of positive cases of cytology derived from ultrasonographically guided breast core needles’ wash material was 65%. The clinical significance is debatable; however, there may be a theoretical risk of local recurrence if the tract is not excised or radiotherapy not given.

Keywords

Breast Core needle biopsy Core wash Cytology Needle tract seeding 

References

  1. 1.
    Liberman L (2000) Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1191–1199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitzal F, Sporn EP, Draxler W, Mittlbock M, Taucher S, Rudas M, Riedl O, Helbich TH, Jakesz R, Gnant M (2006) Preoperative core needle biopsy does not increase local recurrence rate in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97:9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen AM, Haffty BG, Lee CH (2002) Local recurrence of breast cancer after breast conservation therapy in patients examined by means of stereotactic core-needle biopsy. Radiology 225:707–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King TA, Hayes DH, Cederbom GJ, Champaign JL, Smetherman DH, Farr GH, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM (2001) Biopsy technique has no impact on local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Breast J 7:19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knight R, Horiuchi K, Parker SH, Ratzer ER, Frenoglio ME (2002) Risk of needle-track seeding after diagnostic image-guided core needle biopsy in breast cancer. JSLS 6:207–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diaz LK, Wiley EL, Venta LA (1999) Are malignant cells displaced by large-gauge needle core biopsy of the breast? AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1303–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoorntje LE, Schipper MEI, Kaya A, Verkooijen HM, Klinkenbijl JG, Rinkes IHMB (2004) Tumor cell displacement after 14G breast biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:520–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Youngson BJ, Liberman L, Rosen PP (1995) Displacement of carcinomatous epithelium in surgical breast specimens following stereotaxic core biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 103:598–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stolier A, Skinner J, Levine EA (2000) A prospective study of seeding of the skin after core biopsy of the breast. Am J Surg 180:104–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y, Yuen S, Sanuki J, Kimura K, Tanaka K (2007) Ultrasonographically guided 18-gauge automated core needle breast biopsy with post-fire needle position verification (PNPV). Breast Cancer 14:219–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Developed and approved at the National Cancer Institute-sponsored conference, USA (1997) The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cytopathology 16:295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberman L, Vuolo M, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, Polini NM, Rosen PP (1999) Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:677–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thurfjell MG, Jansson T, Nordgren H, Bergh J, Lindgren A, Thurfjell E (2000) Local breast cancer recurrence caused by mammographically guided punctures. Acta Radiol 41:435–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chao C, Torosian MH, Boraas MC, Sigurdson ER, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL, Fowble B (2001) Local recurrence of breast cancer in the stereotactic core needle biopsy site: case reports and review of the literature. Breast J 7:124–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harter LP, Curtis JS, Ponto G, Craig PH (1992) Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology 185:713–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uriburu JL, Vuoto HD, Cogorno L, Isetta JA, Candas G, Imach GC, Bernabo OL (2006) Local recurrence of breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy following core needle biopsy: case reports and review of the literature. Breast J 12:194–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Youngson BJ, Cranor M, Rosen PP (1994) Epithelial displacement in surgical breast specimens following needling procedures. Am J Surg Pathol 18:896–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Breast Imaging SectionShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PathologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations