259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up
- 746 Downloads
The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) is a simple score for predicting the risk of local recurrence (LR) in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) conservatively treated. This score combines three independent predictors of Local Recurrence. The VNPI has recently been updated with the addition of age as a fourth parameter into the scoring system (University of Southern California/ VNPI).
Patients and methods
Our database consisted of 408 women with DCIS. Applying the USC/VNPI we reviewed retrospectively 259 patients who were treated with breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). Of these patients 63.5% had a low VNPI score, 32% intermediate and 4.5% a high score. In the low score group, the majority of the patients underwent Conservative Surgery (CS) without RT while in the intermediate group, almost half of the patients received RT. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the patients with high VNPI were treated with Conservative Surgery plus RT. Nodal assessment by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy was obtained in 32 patients since 2002.
Twenty-one Local Recurrences were observed (8%) with a mean follow up of 130 months: sixteen were invasive. No statistically significant differences in Disease Free Survival were reached in all groups of VNPI score between patients treated with Conservative Surgery or Conservative Surgery plus RT. However it was noted that the higher the VNPI score, the lower was the risk of local recurrence in the group treated additionally with RT, even though it was not statistically significant. Further analysis included those patients treated with Conservative Surgery alone and followed up. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 10 years was 94% with low VNPI and 83% in both intermediate and high score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the subgroups of VNPI. The Local Relapse rate after Conservative Surgery alone, increased with tumor size, margin width, and pathology classification (P < 0,05), while age was not found to be a significant factor. Lesions with only mammographic appearances are associated with lower DFS but it did not reach significance (P = ns), while assumption of estrogenic hormones and familial history of breast cancer are significant factors associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. After multivariate analysis including seven clinical and pathological factors, the only significant predictors of local recurrence remained margin width of surgical excision, previous therapy with estrogens (contraceptives or Hormone Replacement Therapy) and the Van Nuys pathologic classification. The overall survival breast cancer specific was 99% and no differences were observed between groups (P = ns). The comparison of patients treated with a total mastectomy and those conservatively treated showed a significantly better local relapse free survival rate obtained with mastectomy (98.2% vs. 89.7% at 10 years P = 0.02). However, the overall cause-specific survival did not prove any better outcome (98.7% in both groups). Of the 32 patients who underwent a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, four were found to have micrometastases and all of them had a previous Directional Vacuum Assisted Biopsy.
Although in our series there is not a significant difference in LR rates by the parameter of age, the new USC/VNPI is still a simple and reliable scoring system for therapeutic management of DCIS. We did not find any statistically significant advantage in groups treated with the addition of RT. Obtaining wide surgical margins appears to be the strongest prognostic factor for local recurrence, regardless of other pathological factors or the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy. However, only prospective randomized studies can precisely predict the risk of LR of conservatively treated DCIS. The clinical significance of Sentinel Lymph Nodes micrometastases Immuno-Histo-Chemistry-detected found in DCIS patients remains uncertain. However, we hypothesize that the anatomical disruption after preoperative biopsy procedures increases the likelihood of epithelial cell displacement and the frequency of IHC-positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, both of which are directly proportional to the degree of manipulation.
KeywordsBreast cancer Ductal carcinoma in situ Prognosis Treatment Van Nuys prognostic index Age Margins Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- 9.Goldstein NS et al (2000) Differences in the pathologic features of DCIS of the breast based on patient age. Cancer 88:2552–2260Google Scholar
- 12.Silverstein MJ et al (1997) Use of predictors of recurrence to plan therapy for DCIS of the breast. Oncology (Huntingt) 11:393–410Google Scholar
- 13.Silverstein MJ (1997) Predicting local recurrences in patients with DCIS in Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore pp 271–283Google Scholar
- 14.Tavassoli FA et al (1992) Intraductal carcinoma in: anonymous pathology of the breast. Appleton and Lange, New York, pp 238–243Google Scholar
- 22.Rodrigues N et al (2002) Correlation of clinical and pathologic features with outcome in patients with DCIS of the breast treated with breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 54(5):1331–1335Google Scholar
- 25.Mc Cormick B et al (1991) DCIS of the breast: an analysis of local control after conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 231:289–292Google Scholar
- 26.Vicini FA et al (1997) DCIS detected in the mammographic era: an analysis of clinical, pathologic and treatment-related factors affecting outcome with breast conserving therapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 39:627–635Google Scholar
- 29.Cutuli B et al (2002) Breast Conserving therapy for DCIS of the breast: the French cancer centers’ experience. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 53(4):868–879Google Scholar
- 32.Solin LJ et al (1994) Salvage treatment for local recurrence following breast conserving surgery and definitive irradiation for DCIS of the breast. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 30:3–9Google Scholar
- 37.Fowble B et al (1997) Results of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected DCIS. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 38:949–957Google Scholar
- 38.Kuske RR et al (1993) Breast conservation therapy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 26:391–396Google Scholar
- 41.Fourquet A et al (1997) Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the breast. In: Silverstein MJ (ed) Philadelphia Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
- 43.White J et al (1995) Outcome and prognostic factors for local recurrence in mammographically detected DCIS of the breast treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 31:791–797Google Scholar
- 50.Silverstein MJ (2002) The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index in ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia Lippincott Wlliams and Wlinkins, pp 459−473Google Scholar
- 55.Ciatto S, Bonardo R, Cataliotti R et al (1990) Intraductal breast carcinoma. Review of a multicenter series of 350 cases. Coordinating Center and Writing Committee of FONCAM (National Task Force for Breast Cancer), Italy Tumori. 31 Dec 1990; 76(6):552−554Google Scholar