Progressive resistance training in breast cancer: a systematic review of clinical trials
- First Online:
- 1.5k Downloads
Progressive resistance training (PRT) may be effective for targeting the sequelae of breast cancer and its treatment given the unique anabolic nature of this exercise modality. Therefore, our objectives were: (1) to systematically review studies that have prescribed PRT after breast cancer surgery, (2) to summarize the efficacy of PRT in this cohort, and (3) to delineate areas for future investigations.
A systematic review using computerized databases was performed.
The systematic review located 10 trials: Four uncontrolled trials, one controlled trial and five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PRT was prescribed with aerobic training in 8/10 trials reviewed, and in isolation in 2/10 trials reviewed. Upper body PRT was prescribed in 7/10 trials, including 4/5 RCTs. No exacerbation of objectively measured or subjectively reported lymphedema symptoms was reported in any of these trials. Adverse events were rare, generally musculoskeletal in nature, and were managed effectively by conservative means. Overall, the studies we reviewed suggest that women surgically treated for breast cancer can derive health-related and clinical benefits by performing PRT after breast cancer surgery. Further research may be required to stimulate greater advocacy for PRT among oncologists, and in community care settings.
Robustly designed RCTs prescribing targeted PRT regimens throughout various phases of breast cancer treatment are warranted. RCTs with thorough, standardized reporting of interventions and adverse events are required to establish the efficacy of this intervention for the post-treatment management of breast cancer patients and survivors as a means to improve health status and quality of life.
KeywordsWomen Upper Body Exercise Quality of Life Lymphedema
- 1.Breast cancer: statistics on incidence, survival, and screening. Available at: http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/statistics.asp. Accessed May 21, 2007Google Scholar
- 11.Satariano W, Ragland DR (1996) Upper-body strength and breast cancer: A comparison of the effects of age and disease. J Gerontol 51A(5):M215–219Google Scholar
- 14.Markes M, Brockow T, Resch K (2006) Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (online). October 19(4):CD005001Google Scholar
- 17.Cheema B, Abas H, Smith B, et al (in press) Progressive Exercise for Anabolism in Kidney Disease (PEAK): a randomized controlled trial of resistance training during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 18(5):1594–1601 Google Scholar
- 18.Fiatarone Singh MA (2002) Exercise comes of age: Rationale and Recommendations for a geriatric exercise prescription. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57A(5):M262–282Google Scholar
- 19.Kent H (1996) Breast cancer survivors begin to challenge exercise taboos. Can Med Assoc J 155(7):969–971Google Scholar
- 20.McKenzie DC (1998) Abreast in a boat: A race against breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 159(4):376–378Google Scholar
- 25.Herbert R. Confidence Interval Calculator Version 4.1. (Updated 26/01/04). Available at: http://wwwpedrofhsusydeduau/tutorialhtml. Accessed 24 August 2006Google Scholar
- 26.Becker L. Effect Size Calculators. (Revised 20/03/00). Available at: http://webuccsedu/lbecker/Psy590/escalc3htm. Accessed 25 February 2007Google Scholar
- 38.Courneya K, Segal R, Mackey J et al (2007) Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotheraphy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol (in press) Google Scholar
- 41.Hamiton M. (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.Br J Soc Clin Psycho 6:278–296Google Scholar
- 43.Howard KI, Vessey JT, Leuger R, Schank D (1992) The psychotherapeutic service delivery system. Psychother Res 2(3):164–180Google Scholar
- 47.World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 28(3):551–558Google Scholar
- 48.Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski MK et al (1993) SF–36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. Nimrod Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- 49.Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376Google Scholar
- 51.Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar