Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 9–22 | Cite as

Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: A systematic review

  • Daniel Richard Leff
  • Oliver J. Warren
  • Louise C. Enfield
  • Adam Gibson
  • Thanos Athanasiou
  • Darren K. Patten
  • Jem Hebden
  • Guang Zhong Yang
  • Ara Darzi
Review

Abstract

Screening X-ray mammography is limited by false positives and negatives leading to unnecessary physical and psychological morbidity. Diffuse Optical Imaging using harmless near infra red light, provides lesion detection based on functional abnormalities and represents a novel diagnostic arm that could complement traditional mammography. Reviews of optical breast imaging have not been systematic, are focused mainly on technological developments, and have become superseded by rapid technological advancement. The aim of this study is to review clinically orientated studies involving approximately 2,000 women in whom optical mammography has been used to evaluate the healthy or diseased breast. The results suggest that approximately 85% of breast lesions are detectable on optical mammography. Spectroscopic resolution of tissue haemoglobin composition and oxygen saturation may improve the detectability of breast diseases. Results suggest that breast lesions contain approximately twice the haemoglobin concentration of background tissue. Current evidence suggests that it is not possible to distinguish benign from malignant disease using optical imaging techniques in isolation. Methods to improve the performance of Diffuse Optical Imaging, such as better spectral coverage with additional wavelengths, improved modelling of light transport in tissues and the use of extrinsic dyes may augment lesion detection and characterisation. Future research should involve large clinical trials to determine the overall sensitivity and specificity of optical imaging techniques as well as to establish patient satisfaction and economic viability.

Keywords

Diffuse optical imaging Optical mammography Optical tomography Near infrared spectroscopy Breast cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Breast cancer: incidence rises while death continues to fall. Available via http://www.statistics.gov.uk. Cited 4 Dec 2006Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B et al (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361:1405–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future. Available via http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/. Cited 4 Dec 2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S (1998) The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics 18:1137–1154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM et al (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lucassen A Watson E, Eccles D (2004) Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer. Br Med J 322:1040–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cutler M (1929) Transillumination of the breast. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 48:721–727Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arridge SR, Lionheart WRB (1998) Non-uniqueness in diffusion-based optical tomography. Opt Lett 23:882–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nissilä IHJ, Jennions D, Heino J et al (2006) Comparison between a time-domain and a frequency-domain system for optical tomography. J Biomed Opt 11:064015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nioka S, Chance B (2005) NIR spectroscopic detection of breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 4:497–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Arridge SR (2005) Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys Med Biol 50:R1–R43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hebden JC, Delpy DT (1997) Diagnostic imaging with light. Br J Radiol 70:S206–S214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arridge SR, Hebden JC (1997) Optical imaging in medicine: II. Modelling and reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 42:841–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ntziachristos V, Chance B (2001) Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 3:41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spinelli L, Torricelli A, Pifferi A et al (2004) Bulk optical properties and tissue components in the female breast from multiwavelength time-resolved optical mammography. J Biomed Opt 9:1137–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah N, Cerussi A, Eker C et al (2001) Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue. PNAS 98:4420–4425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shah N, Cerussi AE, Jakubowski D et al (2004) Spatial variations in optical and physiological properties of healthy breast tissue. J Biomed Opt 9:534–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pogue BW, Jiang S, Dehghani H et al (2004) Characterization of hemoglobin, water, and NIR scattering in breast tissue: analysis of intersubject variability and menstrual cycle changes. J Biomed Opt 9:541–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Brooksby B et al (2005) Near-infrared characterization of breast tumors in vivo using spectrally-constrained reconstruction. Technol Cancer Res Treat 4:513–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Jiang S et al (2003) Interpreting hemoglobin and water concentration, oxygen saturation, and scattering measured in vivo by near-infrared breast tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12349–12354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Durduran T, Choe R, Culver JP et al (2002) Bulk optical properties of healthy female breast tissue. Phys Med Biol 47:2847–2861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cerussi AE, Berger AJ, Bevilacqua F et al (2001) Sources of absorption and scattering contrast for near-infrared optical mammography. Acad Radiol 8:211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simick MK, Jong R, Wilson B et al (2004) Non-ionizing near-infrared radiation transillumination spectroscopy for breast tissue density and assessment of breast cancer risk. J Biomed Opt 9:794–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pifferi A, Swartling J, Chikoidze E et al (2004) Spectroscopic time-resolved diffuse reflectance and transmittance measurements of the female breast at different interfiber distances. J Biomed Opt 9:1143–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suzuki K Yamashita Y, Ohta K et al (1996) Quantitative measurements of optical parameters in normal breasts using time-resolved spectrsocopy: in vivo results of 30 Japanese women. J Biomed Opt 1:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spinelli L, Torricelli A, Pifferi A et al (2005) Characterization of female breast lesions from multi-wavelength time-resolved optical mammography. Phys Med Biol 50:2489–2502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Intes X (2005) Time-domain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results. Acad Radiol 12:934–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu Q, Cronin EB, Currier AA et al (2005) Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction. Radiology 237:57–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhu Q, Kurtzma SH, Hegde P et al (2005) Utilizing optical tomography with ultrasound localization to image heterogeneous hemoglobin distribution in large breast cancers. Neoplasia 7:263–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu Q, Huang M, Chen N et al (2003) Ultrasound-guided optical tomographic imaging of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical results of 19 cases. Neoplasia 5:379–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grosenick D, Moesta KT, Wabnitz H et al (2003) Time-domain optical mammography: initial clinical results on detection and characterization of breast tumors. Appl Opt 42:3170–3186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grosenick D, Wabnitz H, Moesta KT et al (2004) Concentration and oxygen saturation of haemoglobin of 50 breast tumours determined by time-domain optical mammography. Phys Med Biol 49:1165–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grosenick D, Moesta KT, Moller M et al (2005) Time-domain scanning optical mammography: I. Recording and assessment of mammograms of 154 patients. Phys Med Biol 50:2429–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grosenick D, Wabnitz H, Moesta KT et al (2005) Time-domain scanning optical mammography: II. Optical properties and tissue parameters of 87 carcinomas. Phys Med Biol 50:2451–2468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yates T, Hebden JC, Gibson AP et al (2005) Optical tomography of the breast using a multi-channel time-resolved imager. Phys Med Biol 50:2503–2517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pogue BW, Poplack SP, McBride TO et al (2001) Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot results in the breast. Radiology 218:261–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Taroni P, Torricelli A, Spinelli L et al (2005) Time-resolved optical mammography between 637 and 985 nm: clinical study on the detection and identification of breast lesions. Phys Med Biol 50:2469–2488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taroni P, Pifferi A, Torricelli A et al (2004) Do shorter wavelengths improve contrast in optical mammography? Phys Med Biol 49:1203–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taroni P, Danesini G, Torricelli A et al (2004) Clinical trial of time-resolved scanning optical mammography at 4 wavelengths between 683 and 975 nm. J Biomed Opt 9:464–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chance B, Nioka S, Zhang J et al (2005) Breast cancer detection based on incremental biochemical and physiological properties of breast cancers: a six-year, two-site study. Acad Radiol 12:925–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moesta KT, Fantini S, Jess H et al (1998) Contrast features of breast cancer in frequency-domain laser scanning mammography. J Biomed Opt 3:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gu X, Zhang Q, Bartlett M et al (2004) Differentiation of cysts from solid tumors in the breast with diffuse optical tomography. Acad Radiol 11:53–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Durduran T, Choe R, Yu G et al (2005) Diffuse optical measurement of blood flow in breast tumors. Opt Lett 30:2915–2917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cerussi AE, Jakubowski D, Shah N et al (2002) Spectroscopy enhances the information content of optical mammography. J Biomed Opt 7:60–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Poplack SP, Paulsen KD, Hartov A et al (2004) Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings. Radiology 231:571–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fowler PA, Casey CE, Cameron GG et al (1990) Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:595–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Graham SJ, Stanchev PL, Lloyd-Smith JO et al (1995) Changes in fibroglandular volume and water content of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle observed by MR imaging at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 5:695–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J et al (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622–1629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    van Gils CH, Otten JD, Hendriks J et al (1999) High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen 6:200–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    van Veen RL, Sterenborg HJ, Marinelli AW et al (2004) Intraoperatively assessed optical properties of malignant and healthy breast tissue u sed to determine the optimum wavelength of contrast for optical mammography. J Biomed Opt 9:1129–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ntziachristos V, Yodh AG, Schnall MD et al (2002) MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions. Neoplasia 4:347–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hsiang D, Shah N, Yu H et al (2005) Coregistration of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy for characterizing breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 4:549–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Potten CS, Watson RJ, Williams GT et al (1988) The effect of age and menstrual cycle upon proliferative activity of the normal human breast. Br J Cancer 58:163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Going JJ, Anderson TJ, Battersby S et al (1988) Proliferative and secretory activity in human breast during natural and artificial menstrual cycles. Am J Pathol 130:193–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hutson SW, Cowen PN, Bird CC et al (1985) Morphometric studies of age related changes in normal human breast and their significance for evolution of mammary cancer. J Clin Pathol 38:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rice A, Quinn CM (2002) Angiogenesis, thrombospondin, and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Pathol 55:569–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Folkman J (1995) The influence of angiogenesis research on management of patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 36:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Intes X, Ripoll J, Chen Y et al (2003) In vivo continuous-wave optical breast imaging enhanced with Indocyanine Green. Med Phys 30:1039–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Morris N, Hebden JC, Bland T et al (2003) Role of patient feedback in the design and implementation of clinical trials of optical tomography of the breast. In: Boas D (ed) Proceedings of SPIE, vol 5138: Photon migration and diffuse-light imaging. David Boas, Massachusetts General Hospital, pp 12–22Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Morris N, Balmer B (2006) Are you sitting comfortably? Perspectives of the researchers and the researched on ‘being comfortable’. Account Res 13:111–133PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Richard Leff
    • 1
  • Oliver J. Warren
    • 1
  • Louise C. Enfield
    • 2
  • Adam Gibson
    • 2
  • Thanos Athanasiou
    • 1
  • Darren K. Patten
    • 1
  • Jem Hebden
    • 2
  • Guang Zhong Yang
    • 3
  • Ara Darzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical TechnologyImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Royal Society/Wolfson Medical Image Computing Laboratory, 305/306 Huxley Building, Department of ComputingImperial College of Science, Technology, and MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations