Changes in risk of death from breast cancer with season and latitude
- 152 Downloads
The Norwegian counties can conveniently be divided in three groups with different annual UV exposures and different incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin. In view of the hypothesis that latitude and season of diagnosis may play a role for breast cancer progression, the prognosis of breast cancer as determined for summer and winter diagnosis, were evaluated in the three residential regions. Two age groups were analysed separately (stratification at 50 years). For all regions, and for all ages, the prognosis was best for women diagnosed in the summer season (Relative risk (RR) of death was 15–25% lower for summer diagnosis versus winter diagnosis). There was no significant seasonal variation of the number of new cases. For women diagnosed before the age of 50, a geographical gradient in cancer prognosis was also found (RR of death 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5–0.7 for cases diagnosed in southeast Norway and RR of death 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6–1.1 for diagnosis in the north of Norway). This is in agreement with a 1.5 times larger annual UV exposures and 3–4 times larger incidence rates of SCC in the southeast region when compared with the north region. For women diagnosed after the age of 50, no significant difference was found between the three regions. Despite a 17% higher vitamin D intake from food in north of Norway no difference in cancer survival was found for diagnosis during winter (when no significant differences in the levels of UV exposure can be detected between regions).
The overall data support our earlier hypothesis that season of diagnosis and therapy start improves the survival for breast cancer.
KeywordsBreast cancer survival Solar exposure Active vitamin D
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The present work was supported by Sigval Bergesen D.Y. og hustru Nankis Foundation and by The Research Foundation of The Norwegian Radium Hospital.
- 1.Lim HS, Roychoudhuri R, Peto J, Schwartz G, Baade P, Moller H (2006) Cancer survival is dependent on season of diagnosis and sunlight exposure. Int J Cancer DOI 10.002/ijc.22052 Google Scholar
- 3.Porojnicu AC, Robsahm TE, Dahlback A, Berg JP, Christiani DC, Moan J (2005) Seasonal and geographical variations in lung cancer prognosis in Norway. A possible beneficial role of sun-induced vitamin D (submitted) Google Scholar
- 6.Holick MF (1994) Vitamin D: photobiology, metabolism and clinical application. In: Arias IM, Boyer JL, Fausto N, Jakoby WB, Schachter D, Shafritz DA (eds) The liver: biology␣and photobiology. Raven Press, New York, pp 543– 562Google Scholar
- 7.Kitanaka S, Takeyama K, Murayama A, Sato T, Okumura K, Nogami M, Hasegawa Y, Niimi H, Yanagisawa J, Tanaka T, Kato S (1998) Inactivating mutations in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1alpha-hydroxylase gene in patients with pseudovitamin D-deficiency rickets. N Engl J Med 338:653–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Armstrong BK, Kricker A, English DR (1997) Sun exposure␣and skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol 38(Suppl 1):S1–S6Google Scholar
- 13.Statistics Norway (2006) http://www ssb no/english/subjects/02/01/10/innvbef_en/. Cited 03 July 2006Google Scholar
- 14.Scotto J, Fears TR, Fraumeni JFJ (1983) Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States. NCI NIH Google Scholar
- 19.Johansson L, Solvoll K (1999) Norkost 1997 Norwegian National Dietary Survey. Report by The National Council for Nutrition and Physical Activity. Oslo, pp 45–46Google Scholar
- 21.Statistics Norway (2006) http://www ssb no/en/reise/main html. Cited 03 July 2006Google Scholar