Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature
- 710 Downloads
Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast is a rare form of breast cancer and has an uncertain prognostic significance. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical course, and prognosis, between this type of tumor and poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma.
Patients and methods
We analyzed 37 cases of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast treated at our institution (European Institute of Oncology in Milan, Italy) between 1997 and 2004, comparing them with 72 cases (control group) of poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma. All 109 patients had negative receptors and were G3 at final histology. The control cases were matched according to year of surgery, pT (pT1 vs. pT2/3/4), and pN (absent vs. present).
Of the 37 patients, eleven died from disease progression, eight developed metastatic disease and two experienced local recurrence. In the control group (72 patients) we observed three deaths due to disease progression, 13 distant metastases, and two local recurrences.
The overall survival in the metaplastic carcinoma group was significantly worse than in the control group. As regards to disease-free survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
KeywordsMetaplastic carcinoma of the breast Prognosis Treatment Review
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Pérez-Mies B, et al (2001) Carcinoma metaplásico versus carcinosarcoma de mama. Dos nombres, una entidad? Revisión de 7 casos. CVHAP 2001 Comunicación–E -040Google Scholar
- 21.Ostrowski JL, et al (1998) Monophasic sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology. 32:184–186Google Scholar
- 28.Rosen PP, Ernsberger D (1987) Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma- a variant of metaplastic mammary carcinoma, Am J surg Pathol 11:351–358Google Scholar
- 29.Suster S, et al (1991) Syringomatous squamous tumours of the breast. Cancer 67:2350–2355Google Scholar