Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 285–291 | Cite as

Human breast duct anatomy, the ‘sick lobe’ hypothesis and intraductal approaches to breast cancer

  • James J. Going
  • Timothy J. Mohun
Preclinical study



Information about central and peripheral duct anatomy is a requirement for developing intraductal approaches to human breast cancer, but remains sparse. This study looks at the acquisition and digital modelling of data describing breast duct branching from thick (‘subgross’) sections using data structures from the neurosciences, and at high-throughput imaging of duct anatomy in the nipple.


The branching of a large breast duct system was modelled using data extracted from cleared and stained 2 mm ‘subgross’ sections of an autopsy breast using a public-domain neuron modelling program (CVAPP), and episcopic fluorescence image capture (EFIC) was used to collect a stack of 1100 autofluorescence images of ducts in a mastectomy nipple.


The duct skeleton was captured in 440 line segments with some pruning of terminal ducts. Extracting this data manually in a usable form was, however, laborious and error prone, emphasising the need for improved morphological informatics. EFIC captured anatomical detail and subsequent 3D reconstruction was consistent with the distinction between ‘type A’ and ‘type B’ nipple ducts proposed by Going and Moffat (J Pathol 203: 538–544, 2004).


Whole-lobe duct modelling and EFIC reveal central and peripheral duct anatomy in human breast. Such knowledge is required for understanding normal breast development, the growth of cancer precursors, and for developing the intraductal approach to breast cancer.


anatomy breast cancer ductoscopy human nipple pre-cancer 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study was partly supported by the University of Glasgow.

Supplementary material

10549_2005_9122_MOESM1_ESM.dxf (9.3 mb)
Supplementary material
10549_2005_9122_MOESM2_ESM.htm (0 kb)
Supplementary material


  1. 1.
    Cooper AP, 1840. On the Anatomy of the Breast. London: Longman, Orme, Green, Brown and LongmansGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Mayo MS, Khan SA,: Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and preventionEndocr Relat Cancer2005, 12:185–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    King BL, Love SM, Rochman S, Kim JA,: The fourth international symposium on the intraductal approach to breast cancer, Santa Barbara, California, 10–13 March 2005. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7:198–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Egan RL, Ellis JT, Powell RW,: Team approach the study of diseases of the breastCancer1969, 23:847–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen HM, Rice JR, Wellings SR,: Preneoplastic lesions in the human breastScience 1976, 191:295–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcum RG, Wellings SR,: Subgross pathology of the human breast: method and initial observationsJ Natl Cancer Inst1969, 42:115–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wellings SR, Jensen HM, Marcum RG,: An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesionsJ Natl Cancer Inst1975, 55:231–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Purnell DM, Stowers DJ,: Mammary gland hyperplastic alveolar noduligenesis in the LEW/Mai rat in relation to mitotic activity, estrous cycle status, and ageJ Natl Cancer Inst 1978, 61:1339–1346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weninger WJ, Mohun T,: Phenotyping transgenic embryos: a rapid 3-D screening method based on episcopic fluorescence image capturingNat Genet2002, 30:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Going JJ, Moffat DF,: Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensionsJ Pathol2004, 203:538–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moffat DF, Going JJ,: Three dimensional anatomy of complete duct systems in human breast: pathological and developmental implicationsJ Clin Pathol1996, 49:48–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cannon RC, Turner DA, Pyapali GK, Wheal HV,: An on-line archive of reconstructed hippocampal neuronsJ Neurosci Methods1998, 84:49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiala JC,: Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy. J Microsc. 2005, 218:52–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Love SM, Barsky SH,: Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisitedCancer2004, 101:1947–1957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramsay DT, Kent JC, Hartmann RA, Hartmann PE,: Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imagingJ Anat2005, 206:525–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teboul MHT,: 1995 Atlas of Ultrasound and Ductal Echography of the Breast: The Introduction of Anatomic Intelligence Into Breast Imaging. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohtake T, Abe R, Kimijima I, Fukushima T, Tsuchiya A, Hoshi K, Wakasa H,: Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast-conservative surgery. Computer graphic three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary duct-lobular systemsCancer1995, 76:32–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ohtake T, Kimijima I, Fukushima T, Yasuda M, Sekikawa K, Takenoshita S, Abe R,: Computer-assisted complete three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems: implications of ductal anastomoses for breast-conserving surgeryCancer2001, 91:2263–2272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Besl PJ, McKay ND,: A method for registration of 3D shapesIEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell1992, 14:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Griffin P, Alexopoulos C,: Point pattern matching using centroid boundingIEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1989, 19:1274–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murtagh F,: A new approach to point-pattern matching. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1992, 104:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gillespie JW, Best CJ, Bichsel VE, Cole KA, Greenhut SF, Hewitt SM, Ahram M, Gathright YB, Merino MJ, Strausberg RL, Epstein JI, Hamilton SR, Gannot G, Baibakova GV, Calvert VS, Flaig MJ, Chuaqui RF, Herring JC, Pfeifer J, Petricoin EF, Linehan WM, Duray PH, Bova GS, Emmert-Buck MR,: Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studiesAm J Pathol2002, 160:449–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bink K, Walch A, Feuchtinger A, Eisenmann H, Hutzler P, Hofler H, Werner M,: TO-PRO-3 is an optimal fluorescent dye for nuclear counterstaining in dual-colour FISH on paraffin sectionsHistochem Cell Biol2001, 115:293–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schlechter BL, Yang Q, Larson PS, Golubeva A, Blanchard RA, de las Morenas A, Rosenberg CL,: Quantitative DNA fingerprinting may distinguish new primary breast cancer from disease recurrenceJ Clin Oncol2004, 22:1830–1838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novelli M, Cossu A, Oukrif D, Quaglia A, Lakhani S, Poulsom R, Sasieni P, Carta P, Contini M, Pasca A, Palmieri G, Bodmer W, Tanda F, Wright N,: X-inactivation patch size in human female tissue confounds the assessment of tumor clonalityProc Natl Acad Sci USA2003, 100:3311–3314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsai YC, Lu Y, Nichols PW, Zlotnikov G, Jones PA, Smith HS,: Contiguous patches of normal human mammary epithelium derived from a single stem cell: implications for breast carcinogenesisCancer Res1996, 56:402–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tot T, DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe. Virchows Arch. 2005, 447:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheatle GL, Cutler M,: 1931 Tumours of the Breast. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mokbel K, Escobar PF, Matsunaga T,: Mammary ductoscopy: current status and future prospectsEur J Surg Oncol2005, 31:3–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    King BL, Love SM, Rochman S, Kim JA,: The Fourth International Symposium on the Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer, Santa Barbara, California, 10–13 March 2005. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7:198–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cancer Sciences and Molecular PathologyUniversity of GlasgowScotlandUK
  2. 2.Developmental Biology DivisionNational Institute for Medical ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations