Energy balance and breast cancer risk: a prospective cohort study
- 218 Downloads
While there is evidence that breast cancer risk is positively associated with body mass index (in postmenopausal women) and energy intake and inversely associated with physical activity, few studies have examined breast cancer risk in association with energy balance, the balance between energy intake and expenditure. Therefore, in the cohort study reported here, we studied the independent and combined associations of vigorous physical activity, energy consumption, and body mass index (BMI), with breast cancer risk. The investigation was conducted in 49,613 Canadian women who were participants in the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) and who completed self-administered lifestyle and food frequency questionnaires between 1980 and 1985. Linkages to national mortality and cancer databases yielded data on deaths and cancer incidence, with follow-up ending between 1998 and 2000. During a mean 16.4 years of follow-up, we observed 2545 incident breast cancer cases. Due to exclusions for various reasons, the analyses were based on 40,318 subjects amongst whom there were 1673 incident cases of breast cancer. Participation in vigorous physical activity and body mass index were not independently associated with breast cancer risk in the total cohort. A statistically significant positive trend was observed, however, between energy intake and breast cancer risk (P trend = 0.01). Although there was some variation in risk associated with vigorous physical activity, and BMI when the analyses were stratified by menopausal status, these interactions were not statistically significant. The interaction between menopausal status and energy intake, however, was of borderline statistical significance (P interaction = 0.06), with a statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer associated with highest versus lowest quartile of energy intake among premenopausal women (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13– 1.85, P trend = 0.001). There was evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer associated with a relatively high body mass index among postmenopausal women in the highest quartile level of energy intake (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01– 2.93, P trend = 0.05). In addition, there was evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal, physically inactive, overweight/obese women who consumed ≥1972 kcal/day compared to physically active normal weight women who consumed <1972 kcal/day (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.08–2.37). Our data suggest that obese premenopausal women with relatively high energy intake may be at increased risk of breast cancer. In addition, energy imbalance, represented by a relatively high energy intake, lack of participation in vigorous physical activity, and a relatively high body mass index, may be associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly among premenopausal women.
Key words:body mass index breast neoplasms energy balance energy intake physical activity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Funded in part by the National Cancer Institute of␣Canada. We thank Statistics Canada, the provincial and territorial Registrars of Vital Statistics, and the Cancer Registry directors for their assistance in making the cancer incidence and mortality data available.
- 1.Willett WC, Stampfer MJ: 1998. Implications of total energy intake and epidemiologic analyses. In: Willett WC, (ed). Nutritional Epidemiology. New York (NY), Oxford University Press, 273–301Google Scholar
- 2.Ellison PT: 1995. Understanding natural variation in human ovarian function. In: Dunbar RIM (ed). Human Reproductive Decisions: Biological and Social Perspectives. New York, St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
- 7.Robsahm TE, Tretli S: Breast cancer incidence in food- vs. non-food producing areas in Norway: possible beneficial effects of World War IICancer Causes Control 86: 362–366, 2002Google Scholar
- 11.IARC: 2002. Handbooks on Cancer Prevention, Weight Control and Physical Activity. Lyon, IARC PressGoogle Scholar
- 13.van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yuan SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, Fraser G, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Kushi L, Marshall JR, Miller AB, Rohan TE, Smith-Warner SA, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Wolk A, Hunter DJ: Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer riskAm J Epidemiol 152: 514–527, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C: Canadian National Breast Screening Study. I. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40–49 years. II. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50–59 yearsCan Med Assoc J 147: 1459–1488, 1992Google Scholar
- 19.Watt BK, Merrill A: Composition of Foods: Raw, processed, prepared. Department of Agriculture, 1972Google Scholar
- 22.Rothman KJ, Greenland S: 1998. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia (PA), Lippincott-Raven, p 319Google Scholar
- 30.McTiernan A, Tworoger SS, Rajan KB, Yasui Y, Sorenson B, Ulrich CM, Chubak J, Stanczyk FZ, Bowen D, Irwin ML, Rudolph RE, Potter JD, Schwartz RS: Effect of exercise on serum androgens in postmenopausal women: a 12–month randomized clinical trialCancer Epidemiol Biomar13: 1099–1105, 2004Google Scholar
- 38.De Stavola BL, Wang DY, Allen SD, Giaconi J, Fentiman IS, Reed MJ, Bulbrook RD, Hayward JL: The association of height, weight, menstrual and reproductive events with breast cancer: results from two prospective studies on the island of Guernsey (United Kingdom)Cancer Causes Control 4: 331–340, 1993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.den Tonkelaar I, Seidell JC, Collette HJA, de Waard F: A prospective study on obesity and subcutaneous fat patterning in relation to breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the DOM-projectBr J Cancer 69: 352–357, 1992Google Scholar
- 43.Siiteri PK, Hammond GL, Nisker JA: 1981. Increased availability of serum estrogens in breast cancer: a new hypothesis. In: Pike MC, Siiteri PK, Welsch CW (eds). Hormones and Breast Cancer. Banbury Report 8. Cold Spring Harbor (NY), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 87–106Google Scholar
- 45.McKeown-Eyssen G: Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomar 3, 1994Google Scholar
- 48.Ellison PT: Reproductive ecology and reproductive cancers. In: Panter-Brick C, Worthman CM (eds). Hormones, Health, and Behavior. A Socio-Ecological and Lifespan Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999Google Scholar
- 61.Fletcher O, Gibson L, Johnson N, Altmann DR, Holly JM, Ashworth A, Peto J, Silva Idos S: Polymorphisms and circulating levels in the insulin-like growth factor system and risk of breast cancer: a systematic reviewCancer Epidemiol Biomark14: 2–19, 2005Google Scholar
- 62.MMWR: Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults–United States, 2000–2001Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52: 764–769, 2003Google Scholar