Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 1–6 | Cite as

Predictive Factors of Response to Intensive Decongestive Physiotherapy in Upper Limb Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Treatment: a Cohort Study

  • Stéphane Vignes
  • Raphaël Porcher
  • Annick Champagne
  • Alain Dupuy
Article

Abstract

Background

Lymphedema is a frequent complication after breast cancer treatment. Reduction of lymphedema volume is obtained during an intensive phase with daily physiotherapy. Response to treatment remains unknown prior treatment. We purposed to analyze predictors of response of lymphedema treatment throughout the first course of physiotherapy.

Design

Patients with secondary arm lymphedema were recruited in a single lymphology unit between 2001 and 2004. For each patient, the following data were recorded: characteristics of breast cancer treatment, patient characteristics, body mass index and lymphedema volume prior and at the end of treatment.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-seven women (mean age: 53±11 years) were included. Initial excess volume of lymphedema was correlated to body mass index and duration of lymphedema. Mean duration of intensive decongestive therapy was 11.8±3.3 days. Mean excess volume of lymphedema was 1067±622 ml prior treatment and 663±366 ml after treatment (p<0.001), percentage of excess volume of lymphedema was 59±34% and 36±19%, respectively. Absolute volume reduction was 404±33 ml (p<0.001). Body mass index and duration of lymphedema before treatment were the two predictors of absolute reduction of lymphedema volume. Higher was the body mass index or the duration of lymphedema, more important was the absolute reduction of lymphedema volume. Mean relative percentage of volume reduction was 36±14% whatever mass index or the duration of lymphedema was.

Conclusion

Duration of lymphedema from cancer treatment and body mass index were the only two predictors of absolute reduction of lymphedema volume after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. For all patients this latter treatment is highly effective in management of secondary upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer.

Key words

breast cancer lymphedema physiotherapy predictive factors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Meric F, Buchholz TA, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Ames FC, Ross MI, Pollock RE, Singletary SE, Feig BW, Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Perkins GH, Strom EA, McNeese MD, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK, 2002 Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy Ann Surg Oncol 9: 543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ozaslan C, Kuru B, 2004 Lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer Am J Surg 187: 69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark B, Sitzia J, Harlow W, 2005 Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study Q J Med 98: 343–348Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrek JA, Senie RT, Peters M, Rosen PP, 2001 Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis Cancer 92: 1368–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Földi E, Földi M, Clodius L, 1989 The lymphedema chaos: a lancet Ann Plast Surg 22: 505–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ko DS, Lerner R, Klose G, Cosimi AB, 1998 Effective treatment of lymphedema of the extremities Arch Surg 133: 452–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szuba A, Cooke JP, Yousuf S, Rockson SG, 2000 Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with cancer-related or primary lymphedema Am J Med 109:296–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johansson K, Albertsson M, Ingvar C, Ekdahl C, 1999 Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphedema Lymphology 32: 103–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boris M, Weindorf S, Lasinski B, Boris G, 1994 Lymphedema reduction by non-invasive complex lymphedema therapy Oncology 8: 95–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casley-Smith JR, Casley-Smith JR, 1992 Modern treatment of lymphoedema I Complex physical therapy: the first 200 australian limbs Australas J Dermatol 33: 61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lennihan R Jr, Mackereth M, 1973 Calculating volume changes in a swollen extremity from surface measurements Am J Surg 126:649–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sitzia J, 1995 Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae Eur J Cancer Care 4: 11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sing C, McKenzie DC, 2001 Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82: 1639–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galland C, Auvert JF, Flahault A, Vayssairat M, 2002 Why and how post-mastectomy edema should be quantified in patients with breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 75: 87–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris SR, Hugi MR, Olivotto IA, Levine M, 2001 Steering committee for clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 11 Lymphedema. CMAJ 164:191–199Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Society of Lymphology 2003 The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology Lymphology 36: 84–91Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szuba A, Rockson SG, 1997 Lymphedema: anatomy, physiology and pathogenesis. Vasc Med 2: 321–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dimakakos PB, Stefanopoulos Th, Antoniades P, Antoniou A, Gouliamos A, Rizos D, 1997 MRI and ultrasonographic findings in the investigation of lymphedema and lipedema Int Surg 82:411–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marotel M, Cluzan R, Ghabboun S, Pascot , Alliot F, Lasry JL, 1998 Transaxial computer tomography of lower extremity lymphedema Lymphology 31: 180–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement 1996 National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement: Am J Clin Nutr 64(3 Suppl):524S-532SGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Segerström K, Bjerle P, Graffman S, Nystrom A, 1992 Factors that influence the incidence of brachial oedema after treatment of breast cancer Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 26: 223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Werner RS, McCormick B, Petrek J, Cox L, Cirrincione C, Gray JR, Yahalom J, 1991 Arm edema in conservatively managed breast cancer: obesity is a major predictive factor Radiology 180: 177–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johansson K, Ohlsson K, Ingvar C, Albertsson M, Ekdahl C, 2002 Factors associated with the development of arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment: a match pair case-control study Lymphology 35: 59–71PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Vignes
    • 1
  • Raphaël Porcher
    • 2
  • Annick Champagne
    • 1
  • Alain Dupuy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of LymphologyHôpital Cognacq-JayParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Biostatistics and Medical InformaticsHopital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris 7ParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Dermatology 2Hôpital Saint Louis AP-HPParis Cedex 10France

Personalised recommendations