The impact of a second breast cancer diagnosis on health related quality of life
- 84 Downloads
A growing of research documents the negative impact of recurrent breast cancer on quality of life (QOL), however few prospective investigations are available that compare QOL outcomes across different types of second cancer events (e.g., local/regional recurrence (LR) versus distant/metastatic recurrence (DR) versus a new primary breast cancer (NP)). In addition, although participant attrition is a major issue in this group of cancer patients, the potential impact of attrition or response bias on QOL outcomes is not typically examined. To address these issues, we prospectively examined QOL data obtained from a sample of women (n=140) participating in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study who experienced a second cancer event (LR, DR or NP). Women in our study reported significant worsening in most areas of QOL, except for emotional wellbeing, from pre- to post-second cancer event. Although the patterns of change to QOL differed slightly within each category (LR versus DR versus NP), participants were more similar than different in their QOL ratings. However, the perceived health status of women with DR was significantly lower than women with LR or NP. We also identify important sources of response bias that should be considered when interpreting findings. Specifically, women diagnosed with DR (a) were more likely to decline to complete the post-recurrence QOL questionnaire (27% refusal rate versus 14% LR and 13% NP), and (b) had higher death rates (28% death rate versus 4% LR and 6% NP) after agreeing to but before completing the post-second diagnosis QOL questionnaire.
Keywordsbreast cancer new primary psychosocial adjustment quality of life recurrence response bias
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures – 2004. Atlanta, Author, 2004Google Scholar
- 4.Santiago, RJ, Wu, L, Harris, E, Fox, K, Schultz, D, Glick, J, Solin, LJ 2004Fifteen-year results of breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation for Stage I and II breast carcinoma: the University of Pennsylvania experienceInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys123332340Google Scholar
- 6.Voogd, AC, Nielsen, M, Peterse, JL, Blichert-Toft, M, Bartelink, H, Overgaard, M, Tienhoven, G, Andersen, KW, Sylvester, RJ, Dongen, JA 2001Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Breast Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast conserving therapy or masectomy for Stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trialsJ Clin Oncol1916881697PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Camilleri-Brennan, J, Steele, RJC 2001The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of lifeEur J Cancer27349353Google Scholar
- 11.Hurny, C, Bernhard, J, Coates, AS, Castiglione-Gertsch, M, Peterson, HF, Gelber, RD, Forbes, JF, Rudenstam, CM, Simoncini, E, Crivellari, D, Goldhirsch, A, Senn, HJ 1996for the International Breast Cancer Study Group: Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive breast cancerLancet34712791284PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Pierce, JP, Faerber, S, Wright, FA, Rock, CL, Newman, V, Flatt, SW, Kealey, S, Jones, VE, Caan, BJ, Gold, EB, Haan, M, Hollenbach, KA, Jones, L, Marshall, JR, Ritenbaugh, C, Stefanick, ML, Thomson, C, Wasserman, L, Natarajan, L, Thomas, RG, Gilpin, EA 2002Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study group: a randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) StudyControl Clin Trials23728756PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.American Joint Committee on Cancer: Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th ed. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1992Google Scholar
- 17.Ware, JE, Snow, KK, Kosinski, M, Gandek, B 2000SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation GuideLincoln, RIQualityMetric IncorporatedGoogle Scholar