Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 161–176 | Cite as

Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: clinical evidence for a biological basis

  • Joan E. Cunningham
  • William M. Butler
Article

Abstract

Objective. Racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes are well documented: African-American (AA) women have markedly poorer survival than do European-American (EA) women. A growing literature suggests that AA women have, on average, tumors of more aggressive histopathology, even if discovered early. We investigated this in our South Carolina population.

Methods. Tumor registry data for 1687 AA and EA women with breast cancers newly diagnosed during 2000–2002 at the two Palmetto Health hospitals in Columbia, SC, were reviewed.

Results. Corresponding to our regional population, 31% of cancers were in AA women. In both racial groups, 19% were in situ. Among women with invasive cancers, AA women had significantly earlier age at diagnosis than did EA women. Fewer AA women had lobular carcinoma (p =0.001) or Her-2 over-expressing disease (7 versus 19%, p =0.001). Significantly more AA women had high-grade cancer, larger tumors, axillary metastases and ER negative/PR negative tumors. After controlling for T-stage, AA women were significantly more likely to have high-grade and/or ER negative disease. Detection of invasive cancers by screening mammogram was less frequent in AA women (40 versus 53%, p< 0.000), and in small ER negative cancers.

Conclusions. At diagnosis, breast cancers in AA women tend to have the hallmarks of more aggressive and less treatable disease, even in small tumors, a pattern resembling that of breast cancers in younger EA women. Whatever the causes, these observations suggest breast cancer is biologically different in AA women. This may contribute substantially to the poorer outcomes in African-American women.

African-American biological markers breast cancer disparities estrogen receptor ethnicity race tumor grade 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Murray T, Thun M:Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 52:23–47, 2002Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chu KC, Tarone RE, Brawley OW:Breast cancer trends of black women compared with white women. Arch Fam Med 8:521–528, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moorman P, Jones B, Millikan R, Hall I, Newman B:Race, anthropometric factors, and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 153:284–291,2001Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young H, Ries LG, Pollack ES:Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 73:341–352, 1984Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joslyn SA, West MM:Racial differences in breast carci-noma survival. Cancer 88:114–123, 2000Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobellis J, Cutter G:Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health 92:1144–1150, 2002Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joslyn SA:Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast cancer. Cancer 95:1759–1766, 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newman LA, Mason J, Cote D, Vin Y, Carolin K, Bouwman D, Colditz GA:African-American ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer survival. Cancer 94:2844–2854, 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Middleton LP, Chen V, Perkins GH, Pinn V, Page D: Histopathology of Breast Cancer among African-American women. Cancer 97:253–257, 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trock BJ:Breast cancer in African American women: epidemiology and tumor biology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 40:11–24, 1996Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aziz H, Hussain F, Sohn C, Mediavillo R, Saitta A, Hussain A, Brands M, Homel P, Rotman M:Early onset of breast carcinoma in African American women with poor prognostic factors. Am J Clin Oncol 22:436–440, 1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler WM, Cunningham J:Ethnic differences in breast cancer characteristics. Breast Cancer Online 4:2001Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu KC, Anderson WF, Fritz A, Ries LA, Brawley OW: Frequency distributions of breast cancer characteristics classi ed by estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status for eight racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 92:37–45, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR:Differences in breast cancer hormone receptor status and histology by race and ethnicity among women 50 years of age and older. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent 11:601–607, 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chu KC, Anderson WF:Rates for breast cancer characteristics by estrogen and progesterone receptor status in the major racial/ethnic groups. Breast Cancer Res Treat 74: 199–211, 2002Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Furberg H, Millikan R, Dressler L, Newman B, Geradts J: Tumor characteristics in African American and white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 68:33–43, 2001Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gordon NH:Socioeconomic factors and breast cancer in black and white Americans. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22:55–65, 2003Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanders LC, Hardy WR, Ashford-Carroll TS, Bolick-Aldrich SW:South Carolina Cancer Facts and Figures 2001–2002. South Carolina Central Cancer Registry, Office of Public Health Statistics and Information Services, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Con-trol, and the American Cancer Society, Southeast Division, 2001Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henson DE, Chu KC, Levine PH:Histologic grade, stage, and survival in breast carcinoma. Comparison of African American and Caucasian women. Cancer 98:907–917, 2003Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoo KY, Tajima K, Miura S, Takeuchi T, Hirose K, Risch H, Dubrow R:Breast cancer risk factors according to combined estrogen and progesterone receptor status:a case-control analysis. Am J Epidemiol 146:307–314, 1997Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Potter JD, Cerhan J, Sellers T, McGovern P, Drinkard C, Kushi LH, Folsom A:Progesterone and estrogen receptors and mammary neoplasia in the Iowa Women 's Health Study:How many kinds of breast cancer are there? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent 4:319–326, 1995Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ademuyiwa FO, Olopade OI:Racial differences in genetic factors associated with breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22:47–53, 2003Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Quong J, Eppenberger-Castori S, Moore D III, Scott GK, Birrer MJ, Kueng W, Eppenberger U, Benz CC:Age-dependent changes in breast cancer hormone receptors and oxidant stress markers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76:221–236, 2002Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernstein L, Teal CR, Joslyn S, Wilson J:Ethnicity-related variation in breast cancer risk factors. Cancer 97(1 Suppl): 222–229, 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li CI, Malone KE, Porter PL, Weiss NS, Tang MT, Daling JR:Reproductive and anthropometric factors in relation to the risk of lobular and ductal breast carcinoma among women 65–79 years of age. Int J Cancer 107:647–651,2003Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cotterchio M, Kreiger N, Theis B, Sloan M, Bahl S: Hormonal factors and the risk of breast cancer according to estrogen-and progesterone-receptor subgroup. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1053–1060, 2003Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Polednak AP:Trends in incidence rates for obesity-associ-ated cancers in the US. Cancer Detect Prev 27:415–421, 2003Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colditz GA, Feskanich D, Chen WY, Hunter DJ, Willett WC:Physical activity and risk of breast cancer in pre-menopausal women. Br J Cancer 89:847–851, 2003Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carpenter CL, Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Bernstein L: Effect of family history, obesity and exercise on breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer 106:96–102, 2003Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou JR, Yu L, Mai Z, Blackburn GL:Combined inhibition of estrogen-dependent human breast carcinoma by soy and tea bioactive components in mice. Int J Cancer 108:8–14, 2004Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Cerhan JR, Gapstur SM, Vachon CM, Olsen JE, Pankratz VS, Kushi LH, Folsom AR: Interaction of dietary folate intake, alcohol, and risk of hormone receptor-de ned breast cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Bio-markers Prev 11:1104–1107, 2002Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cho E, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Chen WY, Colditz GA, Willett WC:Premenopausal dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, glycemic load, and ber in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1153–1158, 2003Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jakovljevic J, Touillaud MS, Bondy ML, Singletary SE, Pillow PC, Chang S:Dietary intake of selected fatty acids, cholesterol and carotenoids and estrogen receptor status in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:5–14, 2002Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang LQ:Mammalian phytoestrogens:enterodiol and enterolactone. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 777:289–309, 2002Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miller BA, Hankey BF, Thomas TL:Impact of sociodemo-graphic factors, hormone receptor status, and tumor grade on ethnic differences in tumor stage and size for breast cancer in US women. Am J Epidemiol 155:534–545, 2002Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meenagh A, Williams S, Ross OA, Patterson C, Gorodezky C, Hammond M, Leheny WA, Middleton D:Frequency of cytokine polymorphisms in populations from Western Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and South America. Human Immunol 63:1055–1061,2002Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Iacopetta B, Grieu F, Joseph D:The-174 G/C gene polymorphism in interleukin-6 is associated with an aggres-sive breast cancer phenotype. Br J Cancer 90:419–422, 2004Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fishman D, Faulds G, Jeffery R, Mohamed-Ali V, Yudkin JS, Humphries S, Woo P:The effect of novel polymor-phisms in the interleukin-6 (IL-6)gene on IL-6 transcription and plasma IL-6 levels,and in association with systematic-onset juvenile chronic arthritis. J Clin Invest 102:1369–1376, 1998Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Basolo F, Fiore L, Fontanini G, Conaldi PG, Calvo S, Fancone V, Toniolo A:Expression of and response to interleukin 6 (IL6)in human mammary tumors. Cancer Res 53:3118–3122, 1996Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    DeMichele A, Martin A-M, Mick R, Gor P, Wray L, Klein-Cabral M, Athanasiadis G, Colligan T, Stadtmauer E, Weber B:Interleukin-6–174GC polymorphism is associated with improved outcome in high-risk breast cancer. Cancer Res 63:8051–8056, 2003Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hassan MI, Aschner Y, Manning CH, Xu J, Aschner JL: Racial differences in selected cytokine allelic and genotypic frequencies among healthy, pregnant women in North Carolina. Cytokine 21:10–16, 2003Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ameyaw MM, Tayeb M, Thornton N, Folayan G, Tariq M, Mobarek A, Evans DA, Ofori-Adjei D, McLead HL: Ethnic variation in the HER-2 codon 655 genetic polymor-phism previously associated with breast cancer. J Hum Genet 47:172–175, 2002Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jernstrom H, Chu W, Vesprini D, Tao Y, Majeed N, Deal C, Pollak M, Narod SA:Genetic factors related to racial variation in plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-1: implications for premenopausal breast cancer risk. Mol Genet Metab 72:144–154, 2001Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen VW, Correa P, Kurman RJ, Wu XC, Eley JW, Austin D, Muss H, Hunter CP, Redmond C, Sobhan M et al.: Histological characteristics of breast carcinoma in blacks and whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3:127–135, 1994Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tuamokumo NL, Haffy BG:Clinical outcome and cosmesis in African-American patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer J 9:313–320, 2003Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bissell MJ, Radisky DC, Rizki A, Weaver VM, Petersen OW:The organizing principle:microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 70:537–546, 2002Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mouridsen HT, Rose C, Brodie AH, Smith IE:Challenges in the endocrine management of breast cancer. Breast Aug: S2–S19, 2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan E. Cunningham
    • 1
  • William M. Butler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations