Advertisement

Brain Topography

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 435–444 | Cite as

Change-Driven M100 Component in the Bilateral Secondary Somatosensory Cortex: A Magnetoencephalographic Study

  • Koya YamashiroEmail author
  • Daisuke Sato
  • Hideaki Onishi
  • Kazuhiro Sugawara
  • Naofumi Otsuru
  • Hikari Kirimoto
  • Sho Nakazawa
  • Yudai Yamazaki
  • Hiroshi Shirozu
  • Atsuo Maruyama
Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

Our previous demonstration that the M100 somatosensory evoked magnetic field (SEF) has a similar temporal profile, dipole orientation and source location whether induced by activation (ON-M100) or deactivation (OFF-M100) of electrical stimulation suggests a common cortical system to detect sensory change. While we have not recorded such change-driven components earlier than M100 using electrical stimulation, clear M50 responses were reported using both ON and OFF mechanical stimulation (Onishi et al. in Clin Neurophysiol 121:588–593, 2010). To examine the significance of M50 and M100 in reflecting the detection of somatosensory changes, we recorded these waveforms in 12 healthy subjects (9 males and 3 females) by magnetoencephalography in response to mechanical stimulation from a piezoelectric actuator. Onset and offset (ON and OFF) stimuli were randomly presented with three preceding steady state (PSS) durations (0.5, 1.5 and 3 s) in one consecutive session. Results revealed that (i) onset and offset somatosensory events elicited clear M50 and M100 components; (ii) M50 and M100 components had distinct origins, with M50 localised to the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (cS1) and M100 to the bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (iS2, cS2); and (iii) the amplitude of M50 in cS1 was independent of the PSS durations, whereas that of M100 in S2 was dependent on the PSS durations for both ON and OFF events. These findings suggest that the M50 amplitude in cS1 reflects the number of activated mechanoreceptors during Onset and Offset, whereas the M100 amplitude in S2 reflects change detection based on sensory memory for Onset and Offset stimuli at least in part. We demonstrated that the M50 in cS1 and M100 in S2 plays different roles in the change detection system in somatosensory modality.

Keywords

M50 M100 PSS Change 

Abbreviations

ISI

Interstimulus interval

MEG

Magnetoencephalography

PSS

Preceding steady state

SEFs

Somatosensory magnetic fields

S1

Primary somatosensory cortex

S2

Secondary somatosensory cortex

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Grant-in-aid for Advanced Research from Niigata University of Health and Welfare.

References

  1. Bensmaia SJ, Leung YY, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO (2005) Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. J Neurophysiol 94:3023–3036.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00002.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley C, Joyce N, Garcia-Larrea L (2016) Adaptation in human somatosensory cortex as a model of sensory memory construction: a study using high-density EEG. Brain Struct Funct 221:421–431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0915-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton H, Abend NS, MacLeod AM, Sinclair RJ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME (1999) Tactile attention tasks enhance activation in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. Cereb Cortex 9:662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung YG, Han SW, Kim HS, Chung SC, Park JY, Wallraven C, Kim SP (2015) Adaptation of cortical activity to sustained pressure stimulation on the fingertip. BMC Neurosci 16:71.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0207-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Disbrow E, Roberts T, Poeppel D, Krubitzer L (2001) Evidence for interhemispheric processing of inputs from the hands in human S2 and PV. J Neurophysiol 85:2236–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2000) A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 3:277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1038/72991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forss N, Jousmaki V (1998) Sensorimotor integration in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Brain Res 781:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forss N et al (1994a) Activation of the human posterior parietal cortex by median nerve stimulation. Exp Brain Res 99:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forss N, Salmelin R, Hari R (1994b) Comparison of somatosensory evoked fields to airpuff and electric stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frot M, Garcia-Larrea L, Guenot M, Mauguiere F (2001) Responses of the supra-sylvian (SII) cortex in humans to painful and innocuous stimuli: a study using intra-cerebral recordings. Pain 94:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A (2006) Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cognit Sci 10:14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamada Y, Okita H, Suzuki R (2003) Effect of interstimulus interval on attentional modulation of cortical activities in human somatosensory areas. Clin Neurophysiol 114:548–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hari R, Forss N (1999) Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 354:1145–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T (1982) Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hari R, Joutsiniemi SL, Sarvas J (1988) Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hari R, Karhu J, Hamalainen M, Knuutila J, Salonen O, Sams M, Vilkman V (1993) Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur J Neurosci 5:724–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iguchi Y, Hoshi Y, Nemoto M, Taira M, Hashimoto I (2007) Co-activation of the secondary somatosensory and auditory cortices facilitates frequency discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli. Neuroscience 148:461–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inoue K, Yamashita T, Harada T, Nakamura S (2002) Role of human SII cortices in sensorimotor integration. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1573–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inui K, Tran TD, Qiu Y, Wang X, Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R (2003a) A comparative magnetoencephalographic study of cortical activations evoked by noxious and innocuous somatosensory stimulations. Neuroscience 120:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inui K et al (2003b) Pain processing within the primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Eur J Neurosci 18:2859–2866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inui K, Wang X, Tamura Y, Kaneoke Y, Kakigi R (2004) Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cereb Cortex 14:851–857.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kida T, Nishihira Y, Wasaka T, Nakata H, Sakamoto M (2004) Passive enhancement of the somatosensory P100 and N140 in an active attention task using deviant alone condition. Clin Neurophysiol 115:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kida T, Wasaka T, Inui K, Akatsuka K, Nakata H, Kakigi R (2006) Centrifugal regulation of human cortical responses to a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement. NeuroImage 32:1355–1364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kida T, Inui K, Wasaka T, Akatsuka K, Tanaka E, Kakigi R (2007) Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention. J Neurophysiol 97:3585–3596.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00007.2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lampl I, Katz Y (2017) Neuronal adaptation in the somatosensory system of rodents. Neuroscience 343:66–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ledberg A, O’Sullivan BT, Kinomura S, Roland PE (1995) Somatosensory activations of the parietal operculum of man. A PET Study. Eur J Neurosci 7:1934–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin YY, Forss N (2002) Functional characterization of human second somatosensory cortex by magnetoencephalography. Behav Brain Res 135:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin YY et al (2003) Differential effects of stimulus intensity on peripheral and neuromagnetic cortical responses to median nerve stimulation. NeuroImage 20:909–917.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00387-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mima T, Nagamine T, Nakamura K, Shibasaki H (1998) Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a Magnetoencephalographic Study. J Neurophysiol 80:2215–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naeije G, Vaulet T, Wens V, Marty B, Goldman S, De Tiege X (2018) Neural basis of early somatosensory change detection: a magnetoencephalography study. Brain Topogr 31:242–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-017-0591-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakagawa K, Otsuru N, Inui K, Kakigi R (2014) Change-related auditory P50: a MEG Study. NeuroImage 86:131–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nguyen BT, Inui K, Hoshiyama M, Nakata H, Kakigi R (2005) Face representation in the human secondary somatosensory cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1247–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Onishi H, Oyama M, Soma T, Kubo M, Kirimoto H, Murakami H, Kameyama S (2010) Neuromagnetic activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 121:588–593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Onishi H et al (2013) Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation. Brain Res 1535:78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otsuru N, Inui K, Yamashiro K, Urakawa T, Keceli S, Kakigi R (2011) Effects of prior sustained tactile stimulation on the somatosensory response to the sudden change of intensity in humans: an Magnetoencephalography Study. Neuroscience 182:115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ploner M, Schmitz F, Freund HJ, Schnitzler A (1999) Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing. J Neurophysiol 81:3100–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raij TT, Vartiainen NV, Jousmaki V, Hari R (2003) Effects of interstimulus interval on cortical responses to painful laser stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 20:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J (1993) The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s neuromagnetic evidence. Journal Cognit Neurosci 5:363–370.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.3.363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simoes C, Mertens M, Forss N, Jousmaki V, Lutkenhoner B, Hari R (2001) Functional overlap of finger representations in human SI and SII cortices. J Neurophysiol 86:1661–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simoes C, Alary F, Forss N, Hari R (2002) Left-hemisphere-dominant SII activation after bilateral median nerve stimulation. NeuroImage 15:686–690  https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sokolov EN (1963) Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Physiol 25:545–580.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Supek S, Aine CJ (1993) Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40:529–540.  https://doi.org/10.1109/10.237672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanaka E, Inui K, Kida T, Miyazaki T, Takeshima Y, Kakigi R (2008) A transition from unimodal to multimodal activations in four sensory modalities in humans: an electrophysiological study. BMC Neurosci 9:116.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanaka E, Kida T, Inui K, Kakigi R (2009) Change-driven cortical activation in multisensory environments: an MEG study. NeuroImage 48:464–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Venkatesan L, Barlow SM, Popescu M, Popescu A (2014) Integrated approach for studying adaptation mechanisms in the human somatosensory cortical network. Exp Brain Res 232:3545–3554.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4043-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wasaka T, Kida T, Nakata H, Akatsuka K, Kakigi R (2007) Characteristics of sensori-motor interaction in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in humans: a Magnetoencephalography Study. Neuroscience 149:446–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wikstrom H, Huttunen J, Korvenoja A, Virtanen J, Salonen O, Aronen H, Ilmoniemi RJ (1996) Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs): a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Akatsuka K, Kakigi R (2008) Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res 190:207–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Kakigi R (2009a) Automatic auditory off-response in humans: an MEG study. Eur J Neurosci 30:125–131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06790.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Kakigi R (2009b) Somatosensory off-response in humans: an MEG study. NeuroImage 44:1363–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kakigi R (2011) Change-related responses in the human auditory cortex: an MEG study. Psychophysiology 48:23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01038.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koya Yamashiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daisuke Sato
    • 1
  • Hideaki Onishi
    • 1
  • Kazuhiro Sugawara
    • 2
  • Naofumi Otsuru
    • 1
  • Hikari Kirimoto
    • 3
  • Sho Nakazawa
    • 4
  • Yudai Yamazaki
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Shirozu
    • 5
  • Atsuo Maruyama
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Human Movement and Medical SciencesNiigata University of Health and WelfareNiigataJapan
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health SciencesSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Sensorimotor Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health sciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  4. 4.High Performance CenterNippon Sport Science UniversityKanagawaJapan
  5. 5.Department of NeurosurgeryNishi-Niigata Chuo National HospitalNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations