Brain Activity Mapping from MEG Data via a Hierarchical Bayesian Algorithm with Automatic Depth Weighting
- 124 Downloads
A recently proposed iterated alternating sequential (IAS) MEG inverse solver algorithm, based on the coupling of a hierarchical Bayesian model with computationally efficient Krylov subspace linear solver, has been shown to perform well for both superficial and deep brain sources. However, a systematic study of its ability to correctly identify active brain regions is still missing. We propose novel statistical protocols to quantify the performance of MEG inverse solvers, focusing in particular on how their accuracy and precision at identifying active brain regions. We use these protocols for a systematic study of the performance of the IAS MEG inverse solver, comparing it with three standard inversion methods, wMNE, dSPM, and sLORETA. To avoid the bias of anecdotal tests towards a particular algorithm, the proposed protocols are Monte Carlo sampling based, generating an ensemble of activity patches in each brain region identified in a given atlas. The performance in correctly identifying the active areas is measured by how much, on average, the reconstructed activity is concentrated in the brain region of the simulated active patch. The analysis is based on Bayes factors, interpreting the estimated current activity as data for testing the hypothesis that the active brain region is correctly identified, versus the hypothesis of any erroneous attribution. The methodology allows the presence of a single or several simultaneous activity regions, without assuming that the number of active regions is known. The testing protocols suggest that the IAS solver performs well with both with cortical and subcortical activity estimation.
KeywordsMEG inverse problem Activity map Brain region Bayes factor Deep sources
This work was completed during the visit of DC and ES at University of Rome “La Sapienza” (Visiting Researcher/Professor Grant 2015). The hospitality of the host university is kindly acknowledged. The work of ES was partly supported by NSF, Grant DMS-1312424. The work of DC was partially supported by grants from the Simons Foundation (#305322 and # 246665) and by NSF, Grant DMS-1522334.
- Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (2004) Bayesian theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ (1984) Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Report TKK-F-A559Google Scholar
- Pascual-Marqui RD (1999) Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. Int J Bioelectromagn 1:75–86Google Scholar
- Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Pantazis D, Leahy RM (2011) Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comp Intell Neurosci 2011:879716Google Scholar