Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neuronal Networks in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- 1.1k Downloads
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the prefrontal cortex has been repeatedly shown to improve working memory (WM). Since patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are characterized by both underactivation of the prefrontal cortex and deficits in WM, the modulation of prefrontal activity with tDCS in ADHD patients may increase their WM performance as well as improve the activation and connectivity of the WM network. In the present study, this hypothesis was tested using a double-blind sham-controlled experimental design. After randomization, sixteen adolescents with ADHD underwent either anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, 1 mA, 20 min) or sham stimulation with simultaneous fMRI during n-back WM task. Both in one-back and two-back conditions, tDCS led to a greater activation (compared with sham stimulation) of the left DLPFC (under the electrode), left premotor cortex, left supplementary motor cortex, and precuneus. The effects of tDCS were long-lasting and influenced resting state functional connectivity even 20 min after the stimulation, with patterns of strengthened DLPFC connectivity after tDCS outlining the WM network. In summary, anodal tDCS caused increased neuronal activation and connectivity, not only in the brain area under the stimulating electrode (i.e. left DLPFC) but also in other, more remote brain regions. Because of moderate behavioral effects of tDCS, the significance of this technique for ADHD treatment has to be investigated in further studies.
KeywordsADHD Transcranial direct current stimulation Working memory fMRI
This work was support by the special grant of the Medical Faculty of the University of Marburg.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4 edn. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Bandeira ID, Guimaraes RS, Jagersbacher JG, Barretto TL, de Jesus-Silva JR, Santos SN, Argollo N, Lucena R (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a pilot study. J Child Neurol 31:918–924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain SR, Robbins TW, Winder-Rhodes S, Müller U, Sahakian BJ, Blackwell AD, Barnett JH (2011) Translational approaches to frontostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a computerized neuropsychological battery. Biol Psychiatry 69:1192–1203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cubillo A, Smith AB, Barrett N, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Simmons A, Rubia K (2014) Drug-specific laterality effects on frontal lobe activation of atomoxetine and methylphenidate in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder boys during working memory. Psychol Med 44:633–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Döpfner M, Breuer D, Schurmann S, Metternich TW, Rademacher C, Lehmkuhl G (2004) Effectiveness of an adaptive multimodal treatment in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: global outcome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 1):117–129Google Scholar
- Elmasry J, Loo C, Martin D (2015) A systematic review of transcranial electrical stimulation combined with cognitive training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 33:262–278Google Scholar
- Gajria K, Lu M, Sikirica V, Greven P, Zhong Y, Qin P, Xie J (2014) Adherence, persistence, and medication discontinuation in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 22:1543–1569Google Scholar
- Horvath JC, Carter O, Forte JD (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren’t discussing (but probably should be). Frint Sys Neurosci 8:1–8Google Scholar
- Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, Pogarell O, Kirsch V, Palm U, Karch S, Möller HJ, Nitsche MA, Mulert C (2011a) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting state EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. NeuroImage 55:644–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leffa DT, de Souza A, Scarabelot VL, Medeiros LF, de Oliveira C, Grevet EH, Caumo W, de Souza DO, Rohde LA, Torres IL (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves short-term memory in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 26:368–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer-Lindenberg AS, Olsen RK, Kohn PD, Brown T, Egan MF, Weinberger DR, Berman KF (2005) Regionally specific disturbance of dorsolateral prefrontal–hippocampal functional connectivity in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 62(4):379–386Google Scholar
- Reh V, Schmidt M, Lam L, Schimmelmann BG, Hebebrand J, Rief W, Christiansen H (2015) Behavioral assessment of core ADHD symptoms using the QbTest. J Atten Disord 19:1034–1045Google Scholar
- Siebner H, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 24:3379–3385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siniatchkin M, Glatthaar N, Gerber-von Müller G, Prehn-Kristensen A, Wolff S, Knöchel S, Stephani U, Petermann F, Gerber WD (2012a) Behavioral treatment increases activity in the cognitive network of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain Topogr 25:332–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soltaninejad Z, Nejati V, Ekhtiari H (2016) Effect of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on DLPFC on modulation of inhibitory control in ADHD. J Atten Disord. doi: 10.1177/1087054715618792
- Uebel H, Albrecht B, Asherson P, Borger NA, Butler L, Chen W, Christiansen H, Heise A, Kuntsi J, Schafer U, Andreou P, Manor I, Marco R, Miranda A, Mulligan A, Oades RD, van der Meere J, Faraone SV, Rothenberger A, Banaschewski T (2010) Performance variability, impulsivity errors and the impact of incentives as gender-independent endophenotypes for ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:210–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar