Direct Brain Control and Communication in Paralysis
- 1.1k Downloads
Despite considerable growth in the field of brain-computer or brain-machine interface (BCI/BMI) research reflected in several hundred publications each year, little progress was made to enable patients in complete locked-in state (CLIS) to reliably communicate using their brain activity. Independent of the invasiveness of the BCI systems tested, no sustained direct brain control and communication was demonstrated in a patient in CLIS so far. This suggested a more fundamental theoretical problem of learning and attention in brain communication with BCI/BMI, formulated in the extinction-of-thought hypothesis. While operant conditioning and goal-directed thinking seems impaired in complete paralysis, classical conditioning of brain responses might represent the only alternative. First experimental studies in CLIS using semantic conditioning support this assumption. Evidence that quality-of-life in locked-in-state is not as limited and poor as generally believed draise doubts that “patient wills” or “advanced directives”signed long-before the locked-in-state are useful. On the contrary, they might be used as an excuse to shorten anticipated long periods of care for these patients avoiding associated financial and social burdens. Current state and availability of BCI/BMI systems urge a broader societal discourse on the pressing ethical challenges associated with the advancements in neurotechnology and BCI/BMI research.
KeywordsBrain-computer interface Complete locked-in state Paralysis Patient will
This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Förderzeichen 01GQ0831, 16SV5840), the National Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation (SENESCYT) of Ecuador, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the European Union (FP7-ICT-2011-288551).
- Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Lutzenberger W (1986) Biofeedback of slow corticalpotentials in attentional disorders. In: McCallum WC, Zappoli R, Denoth F (eds) Cerebral psychophysiology: studies in event-related potentials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 248Google Scholar
- Dworkin BR (1993) Learning and physiological regulation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Kübler A, Weber C, Birbaumer N (2006) Locked-in-freigegeben für den tod? Wenn nur denken und fühlen bleiben—neuroethik des eingeschlossenseins. Zeitschrift fürmedizinische Ethik 52(1):57–70Google Scholar
- Lang P, Bradley M, Cuthbert B (1999) International affective picture system. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
- Lulé D, Häcker S, Ludolph A, Birbaumer N, Kübler A (2008) Depression und lebensqualität bei patienten mit amyotropher lateralsklerose. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 105(23):397–403Google Scholar
- Pantke K-H, Birbaumer N (2012) Die lebensqualität schwerstbetroffener nach einem schlaganfall mit locked-in syndrom. Logos Interdisziplinär 20(4):296–300Google Scholar
- Ruf C, De Massari D, Wagner-Podmaniczky F, Matuz T, Birbaumer N. (2013) Semantic conditioning of salivary pH for communication. Special Issues, Artificial Int. & Medicine (in press)Google Scholar
- Silvoni S, Cavinato M, Volpato C, Ruf C, Birbaumer N, Piccione F (2013) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression and stability of brain-computer interface communication. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener (in press)Google Scholar