Advertisement

Brain Topography

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 157–166 | Cite as

Source Connectivity Analysis from MEG and its Application to Epilepsy Source Localization

  • Yakang Dai
  • Wenbo Zhang
  • Deanna L. Dickens
  • Bin HeEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

We report an approach to perform source connectivity analysis from MEG, and initially evaluate this approach to interictal MEG to localize epileptogenic foci and analyze interictal discharge propagations in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Cortical activities were reconstructed from MEG using individual realistic geometry boundary element method head models. Directional connectivity among cortical regions of interest was then estimated using directed transfer function. The MEG source connectivity analysis method was implemented in the eConnectome software, which is open-source and freely available at http://econnectome.umn.edu. As an initial evaluation, the method was applied to study MEG interictal spikes from five epilepsy patients. Estimated primary epileptiform sources were consistent with surgically resected regions, suggesting the feasibility of using cortical source connectivity analysis from interictal MEG for potential localization of epileptiform activities.

Keywords

Epilepsy MEG Source imaging Functional connectivity Directed transfer function eConnectome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH/NIBIB under grants RO1EB006433 and RO1EB007920 to Bin He.

References

  1. Ahlfors SP, Han J, Belliveau JW, Hämäläinen MS (2010) Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation. Brain Topogr 23(3):227–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1971) Autoregressive model fitting for control. Ann Inst Stat Math 23(1):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Salinari S, Ding L, Ni Y, He B, Babiloni F (2005) Assessing cortical functional connectivity by linear inverse estimation and directed transfer function: simulations and application to real data. Clin Neurophysiol 116(4):920–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Marciani MG, Baccala LA, de Vico Fallani F, Salinari S, Ursino M, Zavaglia M, Ding L, Edgar JC, Miller GA, He B, Babiloni F (2007) Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings. Hum Brain Mapp 28(2):143–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Mattia D, Astolfi L, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Ding L, Ni Y, Cheng J, Christine K, Sweeney J, He B (2005) Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function. NeuroImage 24:118–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baccala LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84(6):463–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai X, Towle VL, van Drongelen W, He B (2010) Cortical potential imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials by means of the boundary element method in pediatric epilepsy patients. Brain Topogr 23(4):333–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho J, Hong SB, Jung YJ, Kang HC, Kim HD, Suh M, Jungand KY, Im CH (2011) Evaluation of algorithms for Intracranial EEG (iEEG) source imaging of extended sources: feasibility of using iEEG source imaging for localizing epileptogenic zones in secondary generalized epilepsy. Brain Topogr 24(2):91–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai Y, He B (2011) MEG-based Brain Functional Connectivity Analysis using eConnectome. Proc. of 8th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the 8th International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism. Banff, Canada, May 13–16Google Scholar
  10. Dale AM, Sereno MI (1993) Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cognit Neurosci 5:162–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding L, Worrell GA, Lagerlund TD, He B (2007) Ictal source analysis: localization and imaging of causal interactions in humans. Neuroimage 34(2):575–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebersole JS (1991) EEG dipole modeling in complex partial epilepsy. Brain Topogr 4(2):113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectra methods. Econometrica 37:424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hämäläinen MS, Sarvas J (1989) Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen PC (2007) Regularization Tools Version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3. Numerical Algorithms 2007;46:189–194, http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/∼pch/Regutools/
  16. He B, Musha T, Okamoto Y, Homma S, Nakajima Y, Sato T (1987) Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its accuracy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34:406–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He B, Dai Y, Astolfi L, Babiloni F, Yuan H, Yang L (2011a) eConnectome: A MATLAB toolbox for mapping and imaging of brain functional connectivity. J Neurosci Methods 195(2):261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He B, Yang L, Wilke C, Yuan H (2011b) Electrophysiological imaging of brain activity and connectivity–challenges and opportunities. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(7):1918–1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamiński MJ, Blinowska KJ (1991) A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern 65:203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knowlton RC (2008) Can magnetoencephalography aid epilepsy surgery? Epilepsy Curr 8(1):1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korzeniewska A, Manczak M, Kamiński M, Blinowska K, Kasicki S (2003) Determination of information flow direction between brain structures by a modified directed transfer function method (dDTF). J Neurosci Methods 125:195–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lai Y, van Drongelen W, Ding L, Hecox K, Towle V, Frim D, He B (2005) Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 116:456–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai Y, van Drongelen W, Hecox K, Frim D, He B (2007) Cortical activation mapping of epileptiform activity derived from interictal ECoG spikes. Epilepsia 48(2):305–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin FH, Hara K, Solo V, Vangel M, Belliveau JW, Stufflebeam SM, Hämäläinen MS (2009) Dynamic Granger-Geweke causality modeling with application to interictal spike propagation. Hum Brain Mapp 30(6):1877–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merlet I, Gotman J (1999) Reliability of dipole models of epileptic spikes. Clin Neurophysiol 110(6):1013–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michel C, He B (2011) EEG mapping and source imaging. In: Schomer D, Lopes da Silva F (eds) Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography, 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer & Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Chap 55, pp 1179–1202Google Scholar
  27. Mosher JC, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1999) EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(3):245–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ossadtchi A, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Thyerlei D, Sutherling W, Leahy RM (2004) Automated interictal spike detection and source localization in magnetoencephalography using independent components analysis and spatio-temporal clustering. Clin Neurophysiol 115(3):508–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palus M, Hoyer D (1998) Detecting nonlinearity and phase synchronization with surrogate data. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 17:40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qin L, He B (2005) A wavelet-based time-frequency analysis approach for classification of motor imagery for brain-computer interface applications. J Neural Eng 2(4):65–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qin L, Ding L, He B (2004) Motor imagery classification by means of source analysis for brain-computer interface applications. J Neural Eng 1:135–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shiraishi H, Watanabe Y, Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Fujiwara T, Yagi K (2001) Interictal and ictal magnetoencephalographic study in patients with medial frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 42(7):875–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shiraishi H, Ahlfors SP, Stufflebeam SM, Takano K, Okajima M, Knake S, Hatanaka K, Kohsaka S, Saitoh S, Dale AM, Halgren E (2005) Application of magnetoencephalography in epilepsy patients with widespread spike or slow-wave activity. Epilepsia 46:1264–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stufflebeam SM, Tanaka N, Ahlfors SP (2009) Clinical applications of magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 30(6):1813–1823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka N, Hämäläinen MS, Ahlfors SP, Liu H, Madsen JR, Bourgeois BF, Lee JW, Dworetzky BA, Belliveau JW, Stufflebeam SM (2010) Propagation of epileptic spikes reconstructed from spatiotemporal magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic source analysis. Neuroimage 50(1):217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang L, Mantle M, Ferrari P, Schiffbauer H, Rowley HA, Barbaro NM, Berger MS, Roberts TP (2003) Consistency of interictal and ictal onset localization using magnetoencephalography in patients with partial epilepsy. J Neurosurg 98:837–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer JD (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D Nonlinear Phenom 58:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilke C, van Drongelen W, Kohrman M, He B (2010a) Neocortical seizure foci localization by means of a directed transfer function method. Epilepsia 51(4):564–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilke C, van Drongelen W, Kohrman M, He B (2010b) Identification of epileptogenic foci from causal analysis of ECoG interictal spike activity. Clin Neurophysiol 120(8):1449–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang L, Wilke C, Brinkmann B, Worrell GA, He B (2011) Dynamic imaging of ictal oscillations using non-invasive high-resolution EEG. NeuroImage 56:1908–1917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Y, van Drongelen W, He B (2006) Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans. Appl Phys Lett 89:223903–2239033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang Y, van Drongelen W, Kohrman M, He B (2008) Three-dimensional brain current source reconstruction from intra-cranial ECoG recordings. NeuroImage 42:683–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yakang Dai
    • 1
  • Wenbo Zhang
    • 2
  • Deanna L. Dickens
    • 2
  • Bin He
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Minnesota Epilepsy GroupJohn Nasseff Neuroscience Center at United HospitalSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations