Brain Topography

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 264–271 | Cite as

Connectivity-based parcellation reveals interhemispheric differences in the insula

  • András JakabEmail author
  • Péter P. Molnár
  • Péter Bogner
  • Monika Béres
  • Ervin L. Berényi
Original Paper


The aim of this work was to use probabilistic diffusion tractography to examine the organization of the human insular cortex based on the similarities of its remote projections. Forty right-handed healthy subjects (33.8 ± 12.7 years old) with no history of neurological injury were included in the study. After the spatial standardization of diffusion tensor images, insular cortical masks were delineated based on the Harvard–Oxford Cortical Atlas and were used to initiate fibertracking. Cluster analysis by the k-means algorithm was employed to partition the insular voxels into two groups that featured the most distinct distribution of connections. In order to perform volumetric comparisons, the assigned label maps were transformed back to space of the subjects’ native anatomical MR images. The outlines of the change in connectivity profile did not respect the known cytoarchitectural subdivisions and were shown to be independent from the gyral anatomy. Interhemispheric asymmetry in the volumes of connectivity-based subdivisions was observed putatively marking a leftward functional dominance of the anterior insula and its reciprocally interconnected targets which influences the size of insular area where similar connections are represented. The fractional anisotropy values were not significantly different between the hemipsheres or connectivity-based clusters; however, the mean diffusivity was higher in the anterior insula in both hemispheres.


Insula of reil Cerebral cortex Diffusion tensor imaging Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support of Saad Jbabdi (Centre for Functional Magnetic Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford).

Supplementary material

10548_2011_205_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (577 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. Intersubject variability of DTI connectivity-based clustering of the insular cortex. 3D surfaces were generated by accessing the 95th, 90th, 50th, 10th and 5th percentile volumes of each cluster assignment across the population (n = 40). Major anatomical landmarks have been illustrated (for description, see Fig. 3.). (TIFF 576 kb)
10548_2011_205_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (785 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2. Three-way segmentation of the insula based on its structural connectivity patterns. Visualization with a cross-sectional image of the MNI152 T1-weighted image template and 3D surfaces generated using the label asssignments. Major anatomical landmarks have been illustrated (for description, see Fig. 3.). Red object: anterior insula (AI’), teal object: dorsomedial insula (MI), blue object: posterior insula (PI). (TIFF 784 kb)


  1. Augustine JR (1985) The insular lobe in primates including humans. Neurol Res 7:2–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine JR (1996) Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Rev 22:229–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1996) Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 111:209–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S et al (2003a) Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 50:1077–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich MW, Smith SM, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Boulby PA et al (2003b) Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci 6:750–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 34:144–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao Y, Whalen S, Huang J, Berger KL, DeLano MC (2003) Asymmetry of subinsular anisotropy by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 20:82–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmichael ST, Price JL (1994) Architectonic subdivision of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 346:366–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cauda F, D’Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, Geminiani G, Vercelli A (2011) Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage 55:8–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerliani L, Thomas RM, Jbabdi S, Siero JCW, Nanetti L, Crippa A et al. (2011) Probabilistic tractography recovers a rostrocaudal trajectory of connectivity variability in the human insular cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Craig AD (2002) How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:655–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig AD (2005) Forebrain emotional asymmetry: a neuroanatomical basis? Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 9:566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deen B, Pitskel NB, Pelphrey KA (2011) Three systems of insular functional connectivity identified with cluster analysis. Cereb Cortex 21:1498–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Economo C, Koskinas GN (1925) Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallay DS, Gallay MN, Jeanmonod D, Rouiller EM, Morel A. (2011) The insula of reil revisited: multiarchitectonic organization in macaque monkeys. Cerebral Cortex (in press). First published online: May 25Google Scholar
  16. Guldin WO, Markowitsch HJ (1984) Cortical and thalamic afferent connections of the insular and adjacent cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 229:393–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jbabdi S, Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ (2009) Multiple-subjects connectivity-based parcellation using hierarchical Dirichlet process mixture models. Neuroimage 44:373–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TEJ, Robson MD, Drobnjak I, Rushworth MFS, Brady JM et al (2004) Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13335–13340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein JC, Behrens TEJ, Robson MD, Mackay CE, Higham DJ, Johansen-Berg H (2007) Connectivity-based parcellation of human cortex using diffusion MRI: establishing reproducibility, validity and observer independence in BA 44/45 and SMA/pre-SMA. Neuroimage 34:204–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menke RA, Jbabdi S, Miller KL, Matthews PM, Zarei M (2010) Connectivity-based segmentation of the substantia nigra in human and its implications in parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 52:1175–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mesulam M, Mufson EJ (1982) Insula of the old world monkey. Architectonics in the insulo-orbito-temporal component of the paralimbic brain. J Comp Neurol 212:1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nanetti L, Cerliani L, Gazzola V, Renken R, Keysers C (2009) Group analyses of connectivity-based cortical parcellation using repeated k-means clustering. Neuroimage 47:1666–1677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ochner CN, Green D, van Steenburgh JJ, Kounios J, Lowe MR (2009) Asymmetric prefrontal cortex activation in relation to markers of overeating in obese humans. Appetite 53:44–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ray JP, Price JL (1993) The organization of projections from the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus to orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 337:1–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stefanacci L, Amaral DG (2000) Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: a retrograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol 421:52–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watkins KE, Paus T, Lerch JP, Zijdenbos A, Collins DL, Neelin P et al (2001) Structural asymmetries in the human brain: a voxel-based statistical analysis of 142 MRI scans. Cereb Cortex 11:868–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Westin C-, Maier SE, Mamata H, Nabavi A, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R (2002) Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI. Med Image Anal 6:93–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ziyan U, Westin C (2008) Joint segmentation of thalamic nuclei from a population of diffusion tensor MR images. In: Szekely G (ed) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI 2008. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • András Jakab
    • 1
    Email author
  • Péter P. Molnár
    • 2
  • Péter Bogner
    • 3
  • Monika Béres
    • 1
  • Ervin L. Berényi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Laboratory and Imaging Science, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Debrecen Medical and Health Science CenterDebrecenHungary
  2. 2.Institute of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Debrecen Medical and Health Science CenterDebrecenHungary
  3. 3.Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PécsPecsHungary

Personalised recommendations