A Method to Determine the Presence of Averaged Event-Related Fields Using Randomization Tests
- 754 Downloads
We present a simple and effective method to test whether an event consistently activates a set of brain electric sources across repeated measurements of event-related scalp field data. These repeated measurements can be single trials, single subject ERPs, or ERPs from different studies. The method considers all sensors simultaneously, but can be applied separately to each time frame or frequency band of the data. This allows limiting the analysis to time periods and frequency bands where there is positive evidence of a consistent relation between the event and some brain electric sources. The test may therefore avoid false conclusions about the data resulting from an inadequate selection of the analysis window and bandpass filter, and permit the exploration of alternate hypotheses when group/condition differences are observed in evoked field data. The test will be called topographic consistency test (TCT). The statistical inference is based on simple randomization techniques. Apart form the methodological introduction, the paper contains a series of simulations testing the statistical power of the method as function of number of sensors and observations, a sample analysis of EEG potentials related to self-initiated finger movements, and Matlab source code to facilitate the implementation. Furthermore a series of measures to control for multiple testing are introduced and applied to the sample data.
KeywordsEvoked potentials Randomization Global Field Power Averaging Signal-to-noise ratio
The authors wish to thank the two reviewers for their constructive and fast responses to the initial version of the manuscript.
- De Lucia M, Michel CM, Murray MM (2007) Single subject EEG analysis based on topographic information. Int J Bioelectromagn 9:168–171Google Scholar
- Galan L, Biscay R, Rodriguez JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Rodriguez R (1997) Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 3:240–247Google Scholar
- Greenblatt RE, Pflieger ME (2004) Randomization-based hypothesis testing from event-related data. Brain Topogr 4:225–232Google Scholar
- Koenig T, Studer D, Hubl D, Melie L, Strik WK (2005) Brain connectivity at different time-scales measured with EEG. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1457:1015–1023Google Scholar
- Kristeva R, Keller E, Deecke L, Kornhuber HH (1979) Cerebral potentials preceding unilateral and simultaneous bilateral finger movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 2:229–238Google Scholar
- Lehmann D, Skrandies W (1980) Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 6:609–621Google Scholar
- Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar