Advertisement

On the Flow Past an Array of Two-Dimensional Street Canyons Between Slender Buildings

  • Maria Grazia Badas
  • Simone Ferrari
  • Michela Garau
  • Alessandro Seoni
  • Giorgio QuerzoliEmail author
Research Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The flow above an idealized, two-dimensional series of parallelepipedal buildings is examined with the aim of investigating how the building width (W) to height (H) aspect ratio affects the turbulence in the roughness sublayer and the ventilation of the underlying street canyons. We compare the case of buildings with a squared section (ARB = W/H = 1.0) with a configuration with slender buildings (ARB= 0.1) both in the case of unit canyon width (D) to height (H) aspect ratio (ARC = D/H = 1) and in the case of ARC = 2. The former corresponds to skimming flow and the latter to wake-interference regime. Measurements are performed in a water channel, measuring velocity on a vertical mid-plane using a particle-image velocimetry technique. The mean flow, its second-order turbulence statistics, the exchange fluxes, and the integral time scales are investigated, with results showing that slender buildings enhance turbulence production and yield larger integral time scales in the region just above the building roof. Namely, in the skimming-flow and wake-interference regimes, the maximum vertical velocity variance is more than doubled and increased by 50%, respectively. The combined analysis of the turbulence production fields and the snapshots of the flow during sweep and ejection events demonstrate that the shear layer between the canyon and the external flow is significantly more unstable with slender buildings, mainly because the damping effect of the vertical velocity fluctuations from the flat roof of the upwind building is substantially missing. Consequently, a larger (downstream) portion of the interface is prone to the direct interaction of the external flow structures. The higher turbulence intensity promotes the ventilation at the canyon interface, which is increased by a factor of two in the skimming-flow regime and a factor of 1.26 in the wake-interference regime. In summary, the present experiments show that the effect of the reduced building aspect ratio is particularly significant when the urban canopy consists of narrow canyons. The result is of interest since narrow street canyons are typically bounded by slender buildings in the urban texture of the old European city centres.

Keywords

Building aspect ratio Integral time scale Street canyon Urban boundary layer Ventilation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia, FSC 2014-2020, Grant No. RASSR50082.

References

  1. Badas MG, Ferrari S, Garau M, Querzoli G (2017) On the effect of gable roof on natural ventilation in two-dimensional urban canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 162:24–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badas MG, Salvadori L, Garau M, et al (2019) Urban areas parameterisation for CFD simulation and cities air quality analysis. Int J Environ Pollut (In press). Special Issue: Challenges in development of large-scale pollution models.  https://doi.org/10.1504/ijep.2020.10022368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentham T, Britter R (2003) Spatially averaged flow within obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 37:2037–2043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00123-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besalduch LA, Badas MG, Ferrari S, Querzoli G (2014) On the near field behavior of inclined negatively buoyant jets. EPJ Web Conf 67:02007.  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20146702007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besalduch LA, Badas MG, Ferrari S, Querzoli G (2013) Experimental Studies for the characterization of the mixing processes in negative buoyant jets. EPJ Web Conf 45:01012.  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20134501012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackman K, Perret L, Savory E (2018) Effects of the upstream-flow regime and canyon aspect ratio on non-linear interactions between a street-canyon flow and the overlying boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0378-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackman K, Perret L, Savory E (2015) Effect of upstream flow regime on street canyon flow mean turbulence statistics. Environ Fluid Mech 15:823–849.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9386-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, van Beeck JPAJ (2016) Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: Review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment. Build Environ 100:50–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Böhm M, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR, Hughes D (2013) Turbulence structure within and above a canopy of bluff elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:393–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9770-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britter RE, Hanna SR (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:469–496.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown MJ, Lawson RE, DeCroix DS, Lee RL (2000) Mean flow and turbulence measurements around a 2-D array of buildings in a wind tunnel. In: 11th Joint AMS/AWMA conference on the applications of air pollution meteorology, Long Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Cai X-M, Barlow JF, Belcher SE (2008) Dispersion and transfer of passive scalars in and above street canyons: large-eddy simulations. Atmos Environ 42:5885–5895.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpentieri M, Robins AG (2015) Influence of urban morphology on air flow over building arrays. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 145:61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coceal O, Belcher SE (2016) A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:1349–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui Z, Cai X, Baker JC (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a street canyon. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:1373–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Bernardino A, Monti P, Leuzzi G, Querzoli G (2014) A laboratory investigation of flow and turbulence over a twodimensional urban canopy. In: Proceedings of the Harmo 2014, pp 432–436Google Scholar
  17. Di Bernardino A, Monti P, Leuzzi G, Querzoli G (2015) Water-channel study of flow and turbulence past a two-dimensional array of obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155:73–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9987-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Bernardino A, Monti P, Leuzzi G, Querzoli G (2018) Pollutant fluxes in two-dimensional street canyons. Urban Clim 24:80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Falchi M, Querzoli G, Romano GP (2006) Robust evaluation of the dissimilarity between interrogation windows in image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41:279–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0148-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernando HJS, Lee SM, Anderson J et al (2001) Urban fluid mechanics: air circulation and contaminant dispersion in cities. Environ Fluid Mech 1:107–164.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011504001479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernando HJS, Zajic D, Di Sabatino S et al (2010) Flow, turbulence, and pollutant dispersion in urban atmospheres. Phys Fluids 22:051301.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3407662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrari S, Badas MG, Garau M et al (2017) The air quality in narrow two-dimensional urban canyons with pitched and flat roof buildings. Int J Environ Pollut 62:347.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2017.089419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garau M, Badas MG, Ferrari S et al (2018) Turbulence and air exchange in a two-dimensional urban street canyon between gable roof buildings. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 167:123–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0324-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garau M, Badas MG, Ferrari S, et al (2019) Air Exchange in urban canyons with variable building width: a numerical LES approach. Int J Environ Pollut (In press). Special Issue: HARMO18 V65 N1/2/3:  https://doi.org/10.1504/ijep.2019.10022376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Nagayama K, Meno S (2009) Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132:315–337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9403-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris C, Stephens M (1988) A combined corner and edge detector. In: Alvey vision conference, Citeseer, pp 10–5244Google Scholar
  28. Hosker RP (1984) Flow and diffusion near obstacles. In: Atmospheric science and power production. Randerson D. Office of Scientific and Technical Information, United States Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaroslawski T, Perret L, Blackman K, Savory E (2019) The spanwise variation of roof-level turbulence in a street-canyon flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 170:373–394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0405-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanda M, Maruta E (1993) Characteristics of fluctuating wind pressure on long low-rise buildings with gable roofs. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 50:173–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90072-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kastner-Klein P, Berkowicz R, Britter R (2004) The influence of street architecture on flow and dispersion in street canyons. Meteorol Atmos Phys 87:121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0065-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kastner-Klein P, Fedorovich E, Rotach MW (2001) A wind tunnel study of organised and turbulent air motions in urban street canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89:849–861.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00074-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim Y, Sartelet K, Raut J-C, Chazette P (2015) Influence of an urban canopy model and PBL schemes on vertical mixing for air quality modeling over Greater Paris. Atmos Environ 107:289–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kubilay A, Neophytou MK-A, Matsentides S et al (2017) The pollutant removal capacity of urban street canyons as quantified by the pollutant exchange velocity. Urban Clim 21:136–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Antonia RA (2007) Properties of d- and k-type roughness in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids 19:125101.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2821908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu C-H, Leung DYC, Barth MC (2005) On the prediction of air and pollutant exchange rates in street canyons of different aspect ratios using large-eddy simulation. Atmos Environ 39:1567–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Llaguno-Munitxa M, Bou-Zeid E, Hultmark M (2017) The influence of building geometry on street canyon air flow: validation of large eddy simulations against wind tunnel experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 165:115–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacDonald M, Ooi A, García-Mayoral R et al (2018) Direct numerical simulation of high aspect ratio spanwise-aligned bars. J Fluid Mech 843:126–155.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Macdonald RW, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (1998) An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32:1857–1864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00403-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miozzi M, Querzoli G (1996) PTV and POD analysis of the instabilities in a quasi two-dimensional convective flow. Appl Sci Res 56:221–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mo Z, Liu C-H (2018) Wind tunnel measurements of pollutant plume dispersion over hypothetical urban areas. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murena F, Mele B (2016) Effect of balconies on air quality in deep street canyons. Atmos Pollut Res 7:1004–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neophytou MK-A, Markides CN, Fokaides PA (2014) An experimental study of the flow through and over two dimensional rectangular roughness elements: deductions for urban boundary layer parameterizations and exchange processes. Phys Fluids 1994-Present 26:086603.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4892979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ng E (2009) Policies and technical guidelines for urban planning of high-density cities: air ventilation assessment (AVA) of Hong Kong. Build Environ 44:1478–1488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oke TR (1988) Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy Build 11:103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ozmen Y, Baydar E, van Beeck JPAJ (2016) Wind flow over the low-rise building models with gabled roofs having different pitch angles. Build Environ 95:63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perret L, Blackman K, Fernandes R, Savory E (2017) Relating street canyon vertical mass-exchange to upstream flow regime and canyon geometry. Sustain Cities Soc 30:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perret L, Savory E (2013) Large-scale structures over a single street canyon immersed in an urban-type boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148:111–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9808-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richardson GM, Surry D (1991) Comparisons of wind-tunnel and full-scale surface pressure measurements on low-rise pitched-roof buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 38:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(91)90045-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sadique J, Yang XIA, Meneveau C, Mittal R (2017) Aerodynamic properties of rough surfaces with high aspect-ratio roughness elements: effect of aspect ratio and arrangements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 163:203–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0222-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salizzoni P, Marro M, Soulhac L et al (2011) Turbulent transfer between street canyons and the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141:393–414.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9641-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salizzoni P, Soulhac L, Mejean P (2009) Street canyon ventilation and atmospheric turbulence. Atmos Environ 43:5056–5067.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simón-Moral A, Santiago JL, Krayenhoff ES, Martilli A (2014) Streamwise versus spanwise spacing of obstacle arrays: parametrization of the effects on drag and turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 151:579–596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9901-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuna BA, Tinar E, Rockwell D (2013) Shallow flow past a cavity: globally coupled oscillations as a function of depth. Exp Fluids 54:1586.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1586-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uehara K, Wakamatsu S, Ooka R (2003) Studies on critical Reynolds number indices for wind-tunnel experiments on flow within urban areas. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:353–370.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022162807729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weitbrecht V, Socolofsky SA, Jirka GH (2008) Experiments on mass exchange between groin fields and main stream in rivers. J Hydraul Eng 134:173–183.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:2(173) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zajic D, Fernando HJS, Brown MJ, Pardyjak ER (2015) On flows in simulated urban canopies. Environ Fluid Mech 15:275–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9311-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zajic D, Fernando HJS, Calhoun R et al (2010) Flow and turbulence in an urban canyon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 50:203–223.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2525.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DICAARUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations