On the Feasibility of Using Large-Eddy Simulations for Real-Time Turbulent-Flow Forecasting in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
- 196 Downloads
We investigate the feasibility of using large-eddy simulation (LES) for real-time forecasting of instantaneous turbulent velocity fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. Although LES is generally considered computationally too expensive for real-time use, wall-clock time can be significantly reduced by using very coarse meshes. Here, we focus on forecasting errors arising on such coarse grids, and investigate the trade-off between computational speed and accuracy. We omit any aspects related to state estimation or model bias, but rather look at the size and evolution of restriction errors, subgrid-scale errors, and chaotic divergence, to obtain a first idea of the feasibility of LES as a forecasting tool. To this end, we set-up an idealized test scenario in which the forecasting error in a neutral atmospheric boundary layer is investigated based on a fine reference simulation, and a series of coarser LES grids. We find that errors only slowly increase with grid coarsening, related to restriction errors that increase. Unexpectedly, modelling errors slightly decrease with grid coarsening, as both chaotic divergence and subgrid-scale error sources decrease. A practical example, inspired by wind-energy applications, reveals that there is a range of forecasting horizons for which the variance of the forecasting error is significantly reduced compared to the turbulent background variance, while at the same time, associated LES wall times are up to 300 times smaller than simulated time.
KeywordsLarge-eddy simulation Turbulent boundary layer Wind energy
The authors acknowledge support from the Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship through research Grant No. 141689. The computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the VSC (Flemish Supercomputer Center), funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) and the Flemish Government department EWI.
- Brijs T (2017) Electricity storage participation and modeling in short-term electricity markets. PhD thesis, KU LeuvenGoogle Scholar
- Jiménez J (1998) The largest scales of turbulent wall flows. CTR Annu Res Briefs 137:54Google Scholar
- Katata G, Chino M, Kobayashi T, Terada H, Ota M, Nagai H, Kajino M, Draxler R, Hort M, Malo A et al (2015) Detailed source term estimation of the atmospheric release for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident by coupling simulations of an atmospheric dispersion model with an improved deposition scheme and oceanic dispersion model. Atmos Chem Phys 15(2):1029–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katic I, Højstrup J, Jensen NO (1986) A simple model for cluster efficiency. In: European wind energy association conference and exhibition, pp 407–410Google Scholar
- Lapillonne X, Osterried K, Fuhrer O (2017) Using OpenACC to port large legacy climate and weather modeling code to GPUs. In: Farber R (ed) Parallel programming with OpenACC. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 267–290Google Scholar
- Leelőssy Á, Molnár F, Izsák F, Havasi Á, Lagzi I, Mészáros R (2014) Dispersion modeling of air pollutants in the atmosphere: a review. Open Geosci 6(3):257–278Google Scholar
- Leonard A (1975) Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. In: Frenkiel FN, Munn RE (eds) Advances in geophysics, vol 18. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–248Google Scholar
- Li N, Laizet S (2010) 2DECOMP & FFT—a highly scalable 2D decomposition library and FFT interface. In: Cray user group 2010 conference, pp 1–13Google Scholar
- Munters W, Meyers J (2017b) Optimal coordinated control of wind-farm boundary layers in large-eddy simulations: intercomparison between dynamic yaw control and dynamic induction control. PhD thesis, Dept Mech Eng, KU LeuvenGoogle Scholar
- Schlipf D, Trabucchi D, Bischoff O, Hofsäß M, Mann J, Mikkelsen T, Rettenmeier A, Trujillo JJ, Kühn M (2010) Testing of frozen turbulence hypothesis for wind turbine applications with a scanning lidar system. ISARSGoogle Scholar