Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 170, Issue 1, pp 183–190 | Cite as

Geometric Roughness Estimates of Surf-Zone Wave-Breaking Foam

  • Ami Hansen
  • Jamie MacMahanEmail author
Notes and Comments
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Measurements of small-scale [O (mm)] geometric roughness length (\( k_{\text{f}} \)) associated with surface foam generated by depth-limited breaking waves were obtained within the surf zone on a sandy beach. The parameter \( k_{\text{f}} \) is described using the vertical standard deviation of the sea surface elevation for a foamy area as estimated from stereo imagery. A waterproof two-camera system with self-logging and internal power was developed for collecting stereo images using commercial off-the-shelf components and commercial software for operations 1 m above the sea surface within the middle of the surf zone. The surf-zone foam had a mean \( k_{\text{f}} \) value of 3.2 mm, ranging from 1.7 to 6.3 mm. Using an empirical land-based relationship results in a mean aerodynamic roughness length for surf-zone foam of 0.82 mm, with a range from 0.4 to 1.6 mm, which provides a reasonable estimate of the surf-zone drag coefficient compared with field measurements.

Keywords

Aerodynamic roughness length Bubbles Geometric roughness length Stereo imagery Surf-zone foam 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is a continuation of the ONR funded Coastal Land Air Sea Interaction experiment (N0001417WX00612, N0001417WX01138). We recognize Mara Orescanin for her support in the effort. The Royal Australian Navy supported Ami Hansen for her M.S. at the Naval Postgraduate School, which was the basis of the present study. We thank Ed. Thornton and the three anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript clarity.

References

  1. Aarninkhof SGJ, Ruessink BG (2004) Video observations and model predictions of depth-induced wave dissipation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42(11):2612–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almar R, Castelle B, Ruessink B, Sénéchal N, Bonneton P, Marieu V (2010) Two- and three-dimensional double-sandbar system behaviour under intense wave forcing and a meso–macro tidal range. Cont Shelf Res 30(7):781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechle AJ, Wu CH (2011) Virtual wave gauges based upon stereo imaging for measuring surface wave characteristics. Coastal Eng 58:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benbow C, MacMahan J, Thornton EB (2017) Analysis of surface foam holes associated with depth-limited breaking. J Coastal Res 33:1271–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carini RJ, Chickadel CC, Jessup AT, Thomson J (2015) Estimating wave energy dissipation in the surf zone using thermal infrared imagery. J Geophys Res Ocean 120:3937–3957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnock H (1955) Wind stress on a water surface. Q J R Meteorol Soc 81:639–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corgnati L, Mazzei L, Marini S, Isoppo B, Ottaviani E, Besio G, Magaldi MG (2015) High resolution stereo imaging of sea waves for validation and optimization of wave modelling. OCEANS 2015-Genova, Genoa, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Cote LF, David J, Marks W, Mehr E, McGough R, Pierson WJ, Ronne FC, Ropek J, Stephenson G, Vetter RC, Walden RG (1960) The directional spectrum of a wind generated sea as determined from data obtained by the Stereo Wave Observation Project. NYU Meteorol Pap 2(6):1–88Google Scholar
  9. Emery WJ, Thomson RE (2004) Data analysis methods in physical oceanography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Rogers DP, Edson JB, Young GS (1996) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes for TOGA COARE. J Geophys Res 101:3747–3764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golbraikh E, Shtemler YM (2016) Foam input into the drag coefficient in hurricane conditions. Dyn Atmos Ocean 73:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holman RA, Sallenger A, Lippmann TC, Haines JW (1993) The application of video image processing to the study of nearshore processes. Oceanography 6:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holthuijsen LH (1983) Stereophotography of ocean waves. Appl Ocean Res 5:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsieh CI, Katul G, Chi T (2000) An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv Water Resour 23:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu SA (1970) The shear stress of sea breeze on a swash zone. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on coastal engineering, 13–18 Sept 1970, Washington DC, USA, pp 243–255Google Scholar
  16. Jahne B, Klinke J, Wass S (1994) Imaging of short ocean wind waves: a critical theoretical review. J Opt Soc Am 11:2197–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leon JX, Roelfsema CM, Saunders MI, Phinn SR (2015) Measuring coral reef terrain roughness using ‘structure-from-motion’ close range photogrammetry. Geomorphology 242:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacMahan J (2017) Increased aerodynamic roughness owing to surfzone foam. J Phys Oceanogr 47:2115–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nield JM, King J, Wiggs GF, Leyland J, Bryant RG, Chiverrell RC, Darby SE, Eckardt FD, Thomas DS, Vircavs LH, Washington R (2014) Estimating aerodynamic roughness over complex surface terrain. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(12):961Google Scholar
  20. Schwendeman MS, Thomson J (2017) Sharp-crested breaking waves observed from a ship-based stereo video system. J Phys Oceanogr 47:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shabani B, Neilson P, Baldock T (2014) Direct measurements of wind stress over the surf zone. J Geophys Res Ocean 119:2949–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shabani B, Babanin AV, Baldock TE (2016) Observations of the directional distribution of the wind energy input function over swell waves. J Geophys Res Ocean 121:1174–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sinnett G, Feddersen F (2016) Observations and parameterizations of surfzone albedo. Methods Oceanogr 17:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vugts HF, Cannemeijer F (1981) Measurements of drag coefficients and roughness lengths at the sea-beach interface. J Appl Meteorol 20:335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wieringa J (1993) Representative roughness parameters for homogeneous terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 63:323–3663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oceanography DepartmentNaval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations