Modification of a Parametrization of Shallow Convection in the Grey Zone Using a Mesoscale Model
- 153 Downloads
In current operational numerical weather prediction models, the effect of shallow convection is parametrized. The grey zone of shallow convection is found between the horizontal resolutions of mesoscale numerical models (2–3 km) and large-eddy simulations (10–100 m or finer). At these horizontal scales the shallow convection is to some extent explicitly resolved by the model. The shallow-convection parametrization is still needed, but has to be regulated according to the model horizontal resolution. Here the behaviour of the non-hydrostatic mesoscale numerical weather prediction model Application of Research to Operations at Mesoscale is examined in the grey zone and a new scale-adaptive surface closure of its shallow-convection parametrization, dependent on horizontal resolution, is defined based on large-eddy simulation. The new closure is tested on a series of numerical experiments and validated on a 15-day-long real case period. Its impact on the development of deep convection is examined in detail. The idealized simulations show promising results, as the mean profiles of the subgrid and resolved turbulence change in the desired way. Based on the real case tests our modification has a low impact on model performance, but is part of a set of upgrades of the current parametrization that is aimed to treat the shallow convection grey zone.
KeywordsGrey zone Kilometric scale Numerical weather prediction Scale dependency Shallow convection
This study was prepared at the Hungarian Meteorological Service, financially supported by the RC-LACE consortium. The authors wish to thank André Simon for his help in the case study and Michael Robert Glinton for his language corrections. Detailed and constructive reviews from three anonymous reviewers led to a significant improvement in the text.
- Arakawa A, Lamb VR (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical process of the UCLA general circulation model. Methods Comput Phys 17:173–265Google Scholar
- Brown AR, Cederwall RT, Chlond A, Duynkerke PG, Golaz JC, Khairoutdinov M, Lewellen DC, Lock AP, MacVean MK, Moeng CH, Neggers RAJ, Siebesma AP, Stevens B (2002) Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land. Q J R Meteorol Soc 128:1093–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ertel H (1942) Der vertikale Turbulenz-Wärmestrom in der Atmosphäre. Meteorol Z 59:1690–1698Google Scholar
- Fouquart Y, Bonnel B (1980) Computations of solar heating of the earths atmosphere: a new parameterization. Beitr Phys Atmos 53:35–62Google Scholar
- Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Héreil P, Mascart P, Masson V, Pinty JP, Redelsperger JL, Richard E, de Arellano JVG (1998) The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 16:90–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masson V, Le Moigne P, Martin E, Faroux S, Alias A, Alkama R, Belamari S, Barbu A, Boone A, Bouyssel F, Brousseau P, Brun E, Calvet JC, Carrer D, Decharme B, Delire C, Donier S, Essaouini K, Gibelin AL, Giordani H, Habets F, Jidane M, Kerdraon G, Kourzeneva E, Lafaysse M, Lafont S, Lebeaupin Brossier C, Lemonsu A, Mahfouf JF, Marguinaud P, Mokhtari M, Morin S, Pigeon G, Salgado R, Seity Y, Taillefer F, Tanguy G, Tulet P, Vincendon B, Vionnet V, Voldoire A (2013) The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes. Geosci Model Dev 6:929–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mile M, Bölöni G, Randriamampianina R, Steib R, Kucukkaraca E (2015) Overview of mesoscale data assimilation developments at the Hungarian Meteorological Service. Időjárás 119:215–241Google Scholar
- Szintai B, Szűcs M, Randriamampianina R, Kullmann L (2015) Application of the AROME non-hydrostatic model at the Hungarian Meteorological Service. Időjárás 119:241–265Google Scholar
- Termonia P, Fischer C, Bazile E, Bouyssel F, Brožková R, Bénard P, Bochenek B, Degrauwe D, Derková M, El Khatib R, Hamdi R, Mašek J, Pottier P, Pristov N, Seity Y, Smolíková P, Španiel O, Tudor M, Wang Y, Wittmann C, Joly A (2018) The ALADIN system and its canonical model configurations AROME CY41T1 and ALARO CY40T1. Geosci Model Dev 11:257–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar