Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 167, Issue 3, pp 349–369 | Cite as

Dispersion of a Passive Scalar Fluctuating Plume in a Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part III: Stochastic Modelling

  • Massimo Marro
  • Pietro Salizzoni
  • Lionel Soulhac
  • Massimo Cassiani
Research Article

Abstract

We analyze the reliability of the Lagrangian stochastic micromixing method in predicting higher-order statistics of the passive scalar concentration induced by an elevated source (of varying diameter) placed in a turbulent boundary layer. To that purpose we analyze two different modelling approaches by testing their results against the wind-tunnel measurements discussed in Part I (Nironi et al., Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2015, Vol. 156, 415–446). The first is a probability density function (PDF) micromixing model that simulates the effects of the molecular diffusivity on the concentration fluctuations by taking into account the background particles. The second is a new model, named VP\(\varGamma \), conceived in order to minimize the computational costs. This is based on the volumetric particle approach providing estimates of the first two concentration moments with no need for the simulation of the background particles. In this second approach, higher-order moments are computed based on the estimates of these two moments and under the assumption that the concentration PDF is a Gamma distribution. The comparisons concern the spatial distribution of the first four moments of the concentration and the evolution of the PDF along the plume centreline. The novelty of this work is twofold: (i) we perform a systematic comparison of the results of micro-mixing Lagrangian models against experiments providing profiles of the first four moments of the concentration within an inhomogeneous and anisotropic turbulent flow, and (ii) we show the reliability of the VP\(\varGamma \) model as an operational tool for the prediction of the PDF of the concentration.

Keywords

Concentration statistics Fluctuating plume Gamma distribution Lagrangian stochastic model Micromixing modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

M. Cassiani was partly supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 670462 (COMTESSA).

References

  1. Alessandrini A, Ferrero E (2009) A hybrid Lagrangian–Eulerian particle model for reacting pollutant dispersion in non-homogeneous non-isotropic turbulence. Physica A 388:1375–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amicarelli A, Salizzoni P, Leuzzi G, Monti P, Soulhac L, Cierco FX, Leboeuf F (2012) Sensitivity analysis of a concentration fluctuation model to dissipation rate estimates. Int J Environ Pollut 48:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amicarelli A, Leuzzi G, Monti P, Alessandrini S, Ferrero E (2017) A stochastic Lagrangian micromixing model for the dispersion of reactive scalars in turbulent flows: role of concentration fluctuations and improvements to the conserved scalar theory under non-homogeneous conditions. Environ Fluid Mech 17:715–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassiani M (2013) The volumetric particle approach for concentration fluctuations and chemical reactions in Lagrangian particle and particle-grid models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:207–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassiani M, Giostra U (2002) A simple and fast model to compute concentration moments in a convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 36:4717–4724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassiani M, Franzese P, Giostra U (2005a) A pdf micromixing model of dispersion for atmospheric flow. Part I: development of the model, application to homogeneous turbulence and neutral boundary layer. Atmos Environ 39:1457–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassiani M, Franzese P, Giostra U (2005b) A pdf micromixing model of dispersion for atmospheric flow. Part II: application to convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 39:1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassiani M, Radicchi A, Giostra U (2005c) Probability density function modelling of concentration fluctuation in and above a canopy layer. Agric For Meteorol 133:519–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassiani M, Radicchi A, Albertson JD, Giostra U (2007) An efficient algorithm for scalar pdf modelling in incompressible turbulent flows; numerical analysis with evaluation of iem and iecm micro-mixing models. J Comput Phys 223:519–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassiani M, Franzese P, Albertson J (2009) A coupled Eulerian and Lagrangian mixing model for intermittent concentration time series. Phys Fluids 21(085):105Google Scholar
  11. Cassiani M, Vinuesa JF, Galmarini S, Denby B (2010) Stochastic fields method for sub-grid scale emission heterogeneity in mesoscale atmospheric dispersion models. Atmos Chem Phys 10:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassiani M, Stohl A, Brioude J (2015) Lagrangian stochastic modelling of dispersion in the convective boundary layer with skewed turbulence conditions and a vertical density gradient: Formulation and implementation in the Flexpart model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 154:367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colucci PJ, Jaber FA, Givil P (1998) Filtered density function for large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows. Phys Fluids 10(2):499–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Du S, Sawford BL, Wilson JD (1995) Estimation of the Kolmogorov constant for the Lagrangian structure function, using a second order Lagrangian model of grid turbulence. Phys Fluids 7:30833090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Du S, Wilson DJ, Yee E (1999) Stochastic time series model for threshold crossing statistics of concentration fluctuations in non-intermittent plumes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duplat J, Villermaux E (2008) Mixing by random stirring in confined mixtures. J Fluid Mech 617:51–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durbin PA (1980) A stochastic model of two-particles dispersion and concentration fluctuations in homogeneous turbulence. J Fluid Mech 100:279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Efthimiou GC, Andronopoulos S, Tolias I, Venetsanos A (2016) Prediction of the upper tail of concentration distributions of a continuous point source release in urban environments. Environ Fluid Mech 16:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fackrell JE, Robins AG (1982) The effects of source size on concentration fluctuations in plumes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox RO (1996) On velocity conditioned scalar mixing in homogeneous turbulence. Phys Fluids 8:2678–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franzese P (2003) Lagrangian stochastic modeling of a fluctuating plume in the convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 37:1691–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franzese P, Borgas MS (2002) A simple relative dispersion model for concentration fluctuations in contaminant clouds. J Appl Meteorol 41:1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franzese P, Cassiani M (2007) A statistical theory of turbulent relative dispersion. J Fluid Mech 571:391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gant S, Kelsey A (2012) Accounting for the effect of concentration fluctuations on toxic load for gaseous releases of carbon dioxide. J Loss Prev Process Ind 25:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gant S, Pursell M, Lea C, Fletcher J, Rattigan W, Thyer A, Connolly S (2011) Flammability of hydrocarbon and carbon dioxide mixtures. Process Saf Environ Prot 89:472–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardiner CW (1983) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics chemistry and the natural sciences. Springer, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garmory A, Richardson ES, Mastorakos E (2006) Micromixing effects in a reacting plume by the stochastic fields method. Atmos Environ 40:1078091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gifford F (1959) Statistical properties of a fluctuating plume dispersion model. Adv Geophys 6:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heinz S (2003) Statistical mechanics of turbulent flows. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henn DS, Sykes RI (1992) Large-eddy simulation of dispersion in the convective boundary. Atmos Environ 26A:3145–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilderman T, Wilson DJ (1999) Simulating concentration fluctuation time series with intermittent zero periods and level dependent derivatives. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 91:451–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan H (2014) An estimation of a passive scalar variances using a one-particle Lagrangian transport and diffusion model. Physica A 339:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lien R, D’Asaro EA (2002) The Kolmogorov constant for the Lagrangian velocity spectrum structure function. Phys Fluids 14:4456–4459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luhar AK, Britter RE (1989) A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 23:1911–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luhar AK, Sawford BL (2005) Micromixing modelling of mean and fluctuating scalar fields in the convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 39:6673–6685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manor A (2014) A stochastic single particle Lagrangian model for the concentration fluctuation in a plume dispersing inside an urban canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 150:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marro M, Nironi C, Salizzoni P, Soulhac L (2015) Dispersion of a passive scalar from a point source in a turbulent boundary layer. Part II: analytical modelling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156:447–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milliez M, Carissimo B (2008) Computational fluid dynamical modelling of concentration fluctuations in an idealized urban area. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127:241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1975) Statistical fluid mechanics, vol 2. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Nironi C, Salizzoni P, Mejan P, Grosjean N, Marro M, Soulhac L (2015) Dispersion of a passive scalar from a point source in a turbulent boundary layer. Part I: velocity measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156:415–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Obukhov AM (1959) Description of turbulence in terms of Lagrangian variables. Adv Geophys 6:113–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oettl D, Ferrero E (2017) A simple model to assess odour hours for regulatory purposes. Atmos Environ 155:162–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pope SB (1987) Consistency conditions for random-walk models of turbulent dispersion. Phys Fluids 30(8):23742379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pope SB (1998) The vanishing effect of molecular diffusivity on turbulent dispersion: implications for turbulent mixing and the scalar flux. J Fluid Mech 359:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  46. Postma JV, Wilson DJ, Yee E (2011) Comparing two implementations of a micromixing model. Part i: wall shear-layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rizza U, Mangia C, Carvalho JC, Anfossi D (2006) Estimation of the Lagrangian velocity structure function constant \(c_0\) by large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sawford B (2004) Micro-mixing modelling of scalar fluctuations for plumes in homogeneous turbulence. Flow Turbul Combust 72:133–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sawford B, Stapountzis H (1986) Concentration fluctuations according to fluctuating plume models in one and two dimensions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tennekes H (1982) Similarity relations, scaling laws and spectral dynamics. In: Niewstadt F, Van Dop H (eds) Atmospheric turbulence and air pollution modelling, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 37–68Google Scholar
  51. Thomson DJ (1987) Criteria for the selection of the stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 180:529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomson DJ (1990) A stochastic model for the motion of particle pairs in isotropic high-reynolds-number turbulence, and its application to the problem of concentration variance. J Fluid Mech 210:113–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomson DJ, Montgomery MR (1994) Reflection boundary conditions for random walk models of dispersion in non-gaussian turbulence. Atmos Environ 28:1981–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Villermaux E, Duplat J (2003) Mixing as an aggregation process. Phys Rev Lett 91(184):501Google Scholar
  55. Wilson DJ (1995) Concentration Fluctuations and Averaging Time in Vapor Clouds. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson DJ, Flesch TK (1993) Flow boundaries in random-flight dispersion models: enforcing the well-mixed condition. J Appl Meteorol 32:1695–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson DJ, Sawford BL (1996) Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for trajectories in the turbulent atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xie Z, Hayden P, Voke P, Robins A (2004) Large-eddy simulation of dispersion: Comparison between elevated and ground-level sources. J Turbulence 5:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yee E (2009) Probability law of concentration in plumes dispersing in an urban area. Environ Fluid Mech 9:389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yee E, Skvortsov A (2011) Scalar fluctuations from a point source in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Rev E 84(036):306Google Scholar
  61. Yee E, Wilson DJ (2000) A comparison of the detailed structure in dispersing tracer plumes measured in grid-generated turbulence with a meandering plume model incorporating internal fluctuations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:253–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Marro
    • 1
  • Pietro Salizzoni
    • 1
  • Lionel Soulhac
    • 1
  • Massimo Cassiani
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique, CNRS UMR 5509, University of Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA LyonUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon IEcullyFrance
  2. 2.NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air ResearchKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations