Evaluation of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Electrical Variability
- 303 Downloads
Due to the chaotic motion of charged particles carried by turbulent eddies, electrical quantities in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) have short-term variability superimposed on long-term variability caused by sources from regional to global scales. In this study the influence of radon exhalation rate, aerosol distribution and turbulent transport efficiency on the variability of fair-weather atmospheric electricity is investigated via Lagrangian stochastic modelling. For the mid-latitude lower atmosphere undisturbed by precipitation, electrified clouds, or thunderstorms, the model is capable of reproducing the diurnal variation in atmospheric electrical parameters detected by ground-based measurements. Based on the analysis of field observations and numerical simulation it is found that the development of the convective boundary layer, accompanied by an increase in turbulent kinetic energy, forms the vertical distribution of radon and its decaying short-lived daughters to be approximately coincident with the barometric law for several eddy turnover times. In the daytime ABL the vertical distribution of atmospheric electrical conductivity tends to be uniform except within the surface layer, due to convective mixing of radon and its radioactive decay products. At the same time, a decrease in the conductivity near the ground is usually observed. This effect leads to an enhanced ground-level atmospheric electric field compared to that normally observed in the nocturnal stably-stratified boundary layer. The simulation showed that the variability of atmospheric electric field in the ABL associated with internal origins is significant in comparison to the variability related to changes in global parameters. It is suggested that vertical profiles of electrical quantities can serve as informative parameters on ABL turbulent dynamics and can even more broadly characterize the state of the environment.
KeywordsAtmospheric boundary layer Fair-weather electricity Field observations Lagrangian stochastic model Radon
The study was supported in part by the Russian Science Foundation under Project No. 16-17-10209.
- Gong SL, Barrie LA, Blanchet J-P, von Salzen K, Lohmann U, Lesins G, Spacek L, Zhang LM, Girard E, Lin H, Leaitch R, Leighton H, Chylek P, Huang P (2003) Canadian Aerosol Module: a size segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models 1. Module development. J Geophys Res 108(D1):4007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gringel W, Rosen JM, Hofmann DJ (1986) Electrical structure from 0 to 30 kilometers. In: Krider EP, Roble RG (eds) The Earth’s electrical environment. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 166–182Google Scholar
- Hari Prasad KBRR, Srinivas CV, Satyanarayana ANV, Naidu CV, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2015) Formulation of stability-dependent empirical relations for turbulent intensities from surface layer measurements for dispersion parameterization in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 127:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoppel WA, Anderson RV, Willet JC (1986) Atmospheric electricity in the planetary boundary layer. In: Krider EP, Roble RG (eds) The Earth’s electrical environment. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 149–165Google Scholar
- Kipling Z, Stier P, Johnson CE, Mann GW, Bellouin N, Bauer SE, Bergman T, Chin M, Diehl T, Ghan SJ, Iversen T, Kirkevåg A, Kokkola H, Liu X, Luo G, van Noije T, Pringle KJ, von Salzen K, Schulz M, Seland Ø, Skeie RB, Takemura T, Tsigaridis K, Zhang K (2016) What controls the vertical distribution of aerosols? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II. Atmos Chem Phys 16:2221–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin JC (2012) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere: an introduction. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere. AGU, Geopress, Washington, pp 1–11Google Scholar
- Liu X, Easter RC, Ghan SJ, Zaveri R, Rasch P, Shi X, Lamarque J-F, Gettelman A, Morrison H, Vitt F, Conley A, Park S, Neale R, Hannay C, Ekman AML, Hess P, Mahowald N, Collins W, Iacono MJ, Bretherton CS, Flanner MG, Mitchell D (2012) Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the community atmosphere model CAM5. Geosci Model Dev 5:709–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malakhov SG, Bakulin VN, Dmitrieva GV, Kirichenko LV, Ssissigina TI, Starikov BG (1966) Diurnal variations of radon and thoron decay product concentrations in the surface layer of the atmosphere and their washout by precipitations. Tellus 18(2):643–654Google Scholar
- Mühleisen R (1977) The global circuit and its parameters. In: Dolezalek H, Reiter R (eds) Electrical processes in atmospheres. Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, pp 467–476Google Scholar
- Salm J, Tamm E (2011) Dependence of the ion–aerosol equivalent attachment coefficient on the ratio of polar conductivities in a steady state. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11:211–217Google Scholar
- Zhang K, Feichter J, Kazil J, Wan H, Zhuo W, Griffiths AD, Sartorius H, Zahorowski W, Ramonet M, Schmidt M, Yver C, Neubert REM, Brunke E (2011) Radon activity in the lower troposphere and its impact on ionization rate: a global estimate using different radon exhalations. Atmos Chem Phys 11:7817–7838CrossRefGoogle Scholar