Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 167, Issue 2, pp 327–348 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Electrical Variability

  • Sergey V. Anisimov
  • Sergey V. Galichenko
  • Konstantin V. Aphinogenov
  • Aleksandr A. Prokhorchuk
Research Article
  • 303 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the chaotic motion of charged particles carried by turbulent eddies, electrical quantities in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) have short-term variability superimposed on long-term variability caused by sources from regional to global scales. In this study the influence of radon exhalation rate, aerosol distribution and turbulent transport efficiency on the variability of fair-weather atmospheric electricity is investigated via Lagrangian stochastic modelling. For the mid-latitude lower atmosphere undisturbed by precipitation, electrified clouds, or thunderstorms, the model is capable of reproducing the diurnal variation in atmospheric electrical parameters detected by ground-based measurements. Based on the analysis of field observations and numerical simulation it is found that the development of the convective boundary layer, accompanied by an increase in turbulent kinetic energy, forms the vertical distribution of radon and its decaying short-lived daughters to be approximately coincident with the barometric law for several eddy turnover times. In the daytime ABL the vertical distribution of atmospheric electrical conductivity tends to be uniform except within the surface layer, due to convective mixing of radon and its radioactive decay products. At the same time, a decrease in the conductivity near the ground is usually observed. This effect leads to an enhanced ground-level atmospheric electric field compared to that normally observed in the nocturnal stably-stratified boundary layer. The simulation showed that the variability of atmospheric electric field in the ABL associated with internal origins is significant in comparison to the variability related to changes in global parameters. It is suggested that vertical profiles of electrical quantities can serve as informative parameters on ABL turbulent dynamics and can even more broadly characterize the state of the environment.

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer Fair-weather electricity Field observations Lagrangian stochastic model Radon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by the Russian Science Foundation under Project No. 16-17-10209.

References

  1. Anisimov SV, Mareev EA, Shikhova NM, Dmitriev EM (2002) Universal spectra of electric field pulsations in the atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett 29:2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisimov SV, Galichenko SV, Shikhova NM (2012) Formation of electrically active layers in the atmosphere with temperature inversion. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys 48:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anisimov SV, Galichenko SV, Shikhova NM, Aphinogenov KV (2014a) Electricity of the convective atmospheric boundary layer: field observations and numerical simulation. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys 50:390–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anisimov SV, Galichenko SV, Shikhova NM (2014b) Space charge and aeroelectric flows in the exchange layer: an experimental and numerical study. Atmos Res 135–136:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anisimov SV, Galichenko SV, Aphinogenov KV, Makrushin AP, Shikhova NM (2017a) Radon volumetric activity and ion production in the undisturbed lower atmosphere: ground-based observations and numerical modeling. Phys Solid Earth 53:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anisimov SV, Galichenko SV, Mareev EA (2017b) Electrodynamic properties and height of atmospheric convective boundary layer. Atmos Res 194:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baerentsen JH, Berkowicz R (1984) Monte Carlo simulation of plume dispersion in the convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 18:701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakas NA, Ioannou PJ, Kefaliakos GE (2001) The emergence of coherent structures in stratified shear flow. J Atmos Sci 58:2790–2806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassiani M, Stohl A, Brioude J (2015) Lagrangian stochastic modelling of dispersion in the convective boundary layer with skewed turbulence conditions and a vertical density gradient: Formulation and implementation in the FLEXPART model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 154:367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conzemius R, Fedorovich E (2007) Bulk models of the sheared convective boundary layer: evaluation through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 64:786–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degrazia GA, Anfossi D, Carvalho JC, Mangia C, Tirabassi T, Campos Velho HF (2000) Turbulence parameterization for PBL dispersion models in all stability conditions. Atmos Environ 34:3575–3583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhanorkar S, Kamra AK (2001) Effect of coagulation on the particle charge distribution and air conductivity. J Geophys Res 106(D11):12055–12065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditlevsen O (2003) Stochastic models for atmospheric particle dispersion. Probab Eng Mech 18:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Etling D (1993) Roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer: a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65:215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fedorovich E, Conzemius R (2008) Effects of wind shear on the atmospheric convective boundary layer structure and evolution. Acta Geophys 56(1):114–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs NA (1963) On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in a bipolar ionic atmosphere. Geofis Pura Appl 56(1):185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gong SL, Barrie LA, Blanchet J-P, von Salzen K, Lohmann U, Lesins G, Spacek L, Zhang LM, Girard E, Lin H, Leaitch R, Leighton H, Chylek P, Huang P (2003) Canadian Aerosol Module: a size segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models 1. Module development. J Geophys Res 108(D1):4007.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gringel W, Rosen JM, Hofmann DJ (1986) Electrical structure from 0 to 30 kilometers. In: Krider EP, Roble RG (eds) The Earth’s electrical environment. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 166–182Google Scholar
  19. Hari Prasad KBRR, Srinivas CV, Satyanarayana ANV, Naidu CV, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2015) Formulation of stability-dependent empirical relations for turbulent intensities from surface layer measurements for dispersion parameterization in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 127:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison RG (2013) The Carnegie curve. Surv Geophys 34:209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison RG, Bennett AJ (2007) Cosmic ray and air conductivity profiles retrieved from early twentieth century balloon soundings of the lower troposphere. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 69:515–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoppel WA, Frick GM (1986) Ion–aerosol attachment coefficients and the steady-state charge distribution on aerosols in a bipolar ion environment. Aerosol Sci Technol 5:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoppel WA, Anderson RV, Willet JC (1986) Atmospheric electricity in the planetary boundary layer. In: Krider EP, Roble RG (eds) The Earth’s electrical environment. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 149–165Google Scholar
  24. Hõrrak U, Salm J, Tammet H (2000) Statistical characterization of air ion mobility spectra at Tahkuse observatory: classification of air ions. J Geophys Res 105:9291–9302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hosoda M, Sorimachi A, Yasuoka Y, Ishikawa T, Sahoo SK, Furukawa M, Hassan NM, Tokonami S, Uchida S (2009) Simultaneous measurements of radon and thoron exhalation rates and comparison with values calculated by UNSCEAR equation. J Radiat Res 50:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacoby-Koaly S, Campistron B, Bernard S, Bénech B, Ardhuin-Girard F, Dessens J, Dupont E, Carissimo B (2002) Turbulent dissipation rate in the boundary layer via UHF wind profiler Doppler spectral width measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103:361–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamsali N, Pawar SD, Murugavel P, Gopalakrishnan V (2011) Estimation of small ion concentration near the Earth’s surface. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 73:2345–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim S, Park S, Moeng C (2003) Entrainment processes in the convective boundary layer with varying wind shear. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108:221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kipling Z, Stier P, Johnson CE, Mann GW, Bellouin N, Bauer SE, Bergman T, Chin M, Diehl T, Ghan SJ, Iversen T, Kirkevåg A, Kokkola H, Liu X, Luo G, van Noije T, Pringle KJ, von Salzen K, Schulz M, Seland Ø, Skeie RB, Takemura T, Tsigaridis K, Zhang K (2016) What controls the vertical distribution of aerosols? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II. Atmos Chem Phys 16:2221–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krasnenko NP, Shamanaeva LG (2012) Spatiotemporal dynamics of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the lower atmosphere. Rus Phys J 55:1486–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LeMone MA (1973) The structure and dynamics of horizontal roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 30(6):1077–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin JC (2012) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere: an introduction. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere. AGU, Geopress, Washington, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  33. Liu X, Easter RC, Ghan SJ, Zaveri R, Rasch P, Shi X, Lamarque J-F, Gettelman A, Morrison H, Vitt F, Conley A, Park S, Neale R, Hannay C, Ekman AML, Hess P, Mahowald N, Collins W, Iacono MJ, Bretherton CS, Flanner MG, Mitchell D (2012) Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the community atmosphere model CAM5. Geosci Model Dev 5:709–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu Y, Goodrick S, Heilman W (2014) Wildland fire exhalations, carbon, and climate: wildfire–climate interactions. For Ecol Manag 317:80–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopes FM, Silva HG, Bennett AJ, Reis AH (2017) Global electric circuit research at Graciosa Island (ENA-ARM facility): first year of measurements and ENSO influences. J Electrost 87:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. López-Yglesias X, Flagan RC (2013a) Population balances of micron-sized aerosols in a bipolar ion environment. Aerosol Sci Technol 47:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. López-Yglesias X, Flagan RC (2013b) Ion–aerosol flux coefficient and the steady-state charge distributuion of aerosols in a bipolar ion environment. Aerosol Sci Technol 47:688–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luhar AK, Britter RE (1989) A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 23:1911–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malakhov SG, Bakulin VN, Dmitrieva GV, Kirichenko LV, Ssissigina TI, Starikov BG (1966) Diurnal variations of radon and thoron decay product concentrations in the surface layer of the atmosphere and their washout by precipitations. Tellus 18(2):643–654Google Scholar
  40. Märcz F, Harrison RG (2003) Long-term changes in atmospheric electrical parameters observed at Nagycenk (Hungary) and the UK observatories at Eskdalemuir and Kew. Ann Geophys 21:2193–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mareev EA, Volodin EM (2014) Variation of the global electric circuit and ionospheric potential in a general circulation model. Geophys Res Lett 41:9009–9016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall TC, Rust WD, Stolzenburg M, Roeder WP, Krehbiel PR (1999) A study of enhanced fair-weather electric fields occurring soon after sunrise. J Geophys Res 104:24455–24469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mühleisen R (1977) The global circuit and its parameters. In: Dolezalek H, Reiter R (eds) Electrical processes in atmospheres. Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, pp 467–476Google Scholar
  44. Nilsson ED, Rannik Ü, Kulmala M, Buzorius G, O’Down CD (2001) Effects of continental boundary layer evolution, convection turbulence and entrainment, on aerosol formation. Tellus 53B:441–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrov AI, Petrova GG, Panchishkina IN (2009) Profiles of polar conductivities and radon-222 concentration in the atmosphere by stable and labile stratification of surface layer. Atmos Res 91:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pino D, Vila-Guerau de Arellano J, Duynkerke PG (2003) The contribution of shear to the evolution of a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60:1913–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prasad BSN, Kamsali N, Chandrashekara MS, Madhava MS (2005) Diurnal and seasonal variations of radioactivity and electrical conductivity near the surface for a continental location Mysore, India. Atmos Res 76(1–4):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pruthvi Rani KS, Paramesh L, Chandrashekara MS (2014) Diurnal variations of 218Po, 214Pb, and 214Po and their effect on atmospheric electrical conductivity in the lower atmosphere at Mysore city, Karnataka state, India. J Environ Radioact 138:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quan J, Gao Y, Zhang Q, Xuexi T, Junji C, Han S, Meng J, Chen P, Zhao D (2013) Evolution of planetary boundary layer under different weather conditions, and its impact on aerosol concentrations. Particuology 11(1):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rakesh PT, Venkatesan R, Srinivas CV (2013) Formulation of TKE based empirical diffusivity relations from turbulence measurements and incorporation in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model. Environ Fluid Mech 13:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rannik Ü, Zhou L, Zhou P, Gierens R, Mammarella I, Sogachev A, Boy M (2016) Aerosol dynamics within and above forest in relation to turbulent transport and dry deposition. Atmos Chem Phys 16:3145–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rorig ML, Ferguson SA (1999) Characteristics of lightning and wildland fire ignition in the Pacific Northwest. J Appl Meteorol 38:1565–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rotach MW, Gryning SE, Tassone C (1996) A two-dimensional Lagrangian dispersion model for daytime conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122(530):367–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salesky ST, Chamecki M, Bou-Zeid E (2017) On the nature of the transition between roll and cellular organization in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 163:41–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salm J, Tamm E (2011) Dependence of the ion–aerosol equivalent attachment coefficient on the ratio of polar conductivities in a steady state. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11:211–217Google Scholar
  56. Slyunyaev NN, Mareev EA, Zhidkov AA (2015) On the variation of the ionospheric potential due to large-scale radioactivity enhancement and solar activity. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120:7060–7082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stohl A, Thomson DJ (1999) A density correction for Lagrangian particle dispersion models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sun J, Wang Y (2008) Effect of the entrainment flux ratio on the relationship between entrainment rate and convective Richardson number. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tacza J, Raulin JP, Macotela E, Norabuena E, Fernandez G, Correia E, Rycroft MJ, Harrison RG (2014) A new South American network to study the atmospheric electric field and its variations related to geophysical phenomena. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 120:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomson DJ (1987) Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid 180:529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomson DJ, Physick WL, Maryon RH (1997) Treatment of interfaces in random walk dispersion models. J Appl Meteorol 36:1284–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tinsley BA, Zhou L (2006) Initial results of a global circuit model with variable stratospheric aerosols. J Geophys Res 111:D16205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tjernström M, Balsley BB, Svensson G, Nappo CJ (2009) The effects of critical layers on residual layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 66:468–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vinuesa J, Basu S, Galmarini S (2007) The diurnal evolution of \(^{222}\text{ Rn }\) and its progeny in the atmospheric boundary layer during the WANGARA experiment. Atmos Chem Phys 7:5003–5019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weckwerth T, Horst T, Wilson J (1999) An observational study of the evolution of horizontal convective rolls. Mon Weather Rev 128(12):4017–4030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams AG, Zahorowski W, Chambers S, Griffiths A, Hacker JM, Element A, Werczynsky S (2011) The vertical distribution of radon in clear and cloudy daytime terrestrial boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 68:155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson JD, Sawford BL (1996) Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for trajectories in the turbulent atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yair Y, Levin Z (1989) Charging of polydispersed aerosol particles by attachment of atmospheric ions. J Geophys Res 94(D11):13085–13091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yaniv R, Yair Y, Price C, Mkrtchyan H, Lynn B, Reymers A (2017) Ground-based measurements of the vertical E-field in mountainous regions and the “Austausch” effect. Atmos Res 189:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yue P, Zhang Q, Wang R, Li Y, Wang S (2015) Turbulence intensity and turbulent kinetic energy parameters over a heterogeneous terrain of the Loess Plateau, China. Adv Atmos Sci 32(9):1291–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang L, Gong S, Padro J, Barrie L (2001) A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos Environ 35:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang K, Feichter J, Kazil J, Wan H, Zhuo W, Griffiths AD, Sartorius H, Zahorowski W, Ramonet M, Schmidt M, Yver C, Neubert REM, Brunke E (2011) Radon activity in the lower troposphere and its impact on ionization rate: a global estimate using different radon exhalations. Atmos Chem Phys 11:7817–7838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhou L, Tinsley BA (2007) Production of space charge at the boundaries of layer clouds. J Geophys Res 112:D11203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borok Geophysical Observatory of Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth RASYaroslavlRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations