Parametrization of the Tidal Effect for Use in the Noah Land-Surface Model: Development and Validation
- 248 Downloads
We have developed a parametrization of tidal effects for use in the Noah land-surface model and have validated the land-surface model using observations taken over a tidal flat of the western coast of South Korea. The parametrization is based on the energy budget of a water layer with varying thickness above the soil. During flood tide, heat transfer by the moving water is considered in addition to the surface energy budget. In addition, partial penetration of solar radiation through the water layer is considered in the surface energy budget, and the water thickness varying with time is used as an additional input. Seven days with clear-sky conditions and westerly winds during the daytime are selected for validation of the model. Two simulations are performed in an offline mode: a control simulation without the tidal effect (CONTROL) and a simulation with the tidal effect (TIDE). Comparisons of results have been made with eddy-covariance measurements and soil temperature data for the tidal flats. Observations show that inundation significantly reduces both sensible and latent heat fluxes during daytime, which is well simulated in the TIDE simulation. The diurnal variation and magnitude of soil temperature are better simulated in the TIDE than in the CONTROL simulation. Some underestimation of the latent heat flux over the water surface is partly attributed to the use of one layer of water and the underestimated roughness length at this site. In addition, other model deficiencies are discussed.
KeywordsEddy-covariance measurements Land-surface model Surface energy budget Tidal flat
This work was supported by the Integrated Weather Services for Urban and Rural Area of National Institute of Meteorological Research (NIMR).
- Ahrens CD (2009) Meteorology today, 9th edn. Brook/Cole, Belmont, 527 ppGoogle Scholar
- Arya SP (2001) Introduction to micrometeorology. Academic Press, San Diego, 420 ppGoogle Scholar
- Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer Ch, Davis K, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger JW, Oechel W, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, New York, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
- Hong S, Dudhia J (2012) Next-generation numerical weather prediction. Bridging parameterization, explicit clouds, and large eddies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93: ES6–ES9. doi: 10.1175/2011BAMS3224.1
- Mitchell K (2005) The community Noah land-surface model (LSM). ftp://ftp.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/gcp/ldas/noahlsm/ver_2.7.1
- Oleson K, Dai Y, Bonan G, Bosilovich M, Dickinson R, Dirmeyer P, Hoffman F, Houser P, Levis S, Niu GY, Thornton P, Vertenstein M, Yang ZL, Zeng X (2004) Technical description of the community land model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-461+STR, 173 ppGoogle Scholar
- Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Technical Note, NCAAR/TN-475+STR, 113 ppGoogle Scholar
- Slater RO, McIlroy IC (1961) Practical micrometeorology. CSIRO Division of Meteorological Physics, Melbourne 310 ppGoogle Scholar
- Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Mayers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar