Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 160, Issue 1, pp 83–111 | Cite as

The Role of Large-Coherent-Eddy Transport in the Atmospheric Surface Layer Based on CASES-99 Observations

  • Jielun SunEmail author
  • Donald H. Lenschow
  • Margaret A. LeMone
  • Larry Mahrt
Research Article

Abstract

The analysis of momentum and heat fluxes from the Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study 1999 (CASES-99) field experiment is extended throughout the diurnal cycle following the investigation of nighttime turbulence by Sun et al. (J Atmos Sci 69:338–351, 2012). Based on the observations, limitations of Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) are examined in detail. The analysis suggests that strong turbulent mixing is dominated by relatively large coherent eddies that are not related to local vertical gradients as assumed in MOST. The HOckey-Stick Transition (HOST) hypothesis is developed to explain the generation of observed large coherent eddies over a finite depth and the contribution of these eddies to vertical variations of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stratification throughout the diurnal cycle. The HOST hypothesis emphasizes the connection between dominant turbulent eddies and turbulence generation scales, and the coupling between the turbulence kinetic energy and the turbulence potential energy within the turbulence generation layer in determining turbulence intensity. For turbulence generation directly influenced by the surface, the HOST hypothesis recognizes the role of the surface both in the vertical variation of momentum and heat fluxes and its boundary effect on the size of the dominant turbulence eddies.

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer Large coherent eddies  Momentum and heat fluxes Non-local turbulent mixing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, and acknowledge the field support from the Earth Observing Laboratory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Larry Mahrt received support from Grant AGS-1115011 from the National Science Foundation. The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Acevedo OC, Fitzjarrald DR (2003) In the core of the night-effects of intermittent mixing on a horizontally heterogeneous surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 106:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreas EL, Hicks BB (2002) Comments on critical test of the validity of Monin-Obukhov similarity during convective conditions. J Atmos Sci 59:2605–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baas P, Steeneveld GJ, van de Wiel BJH, Holtslag AAM (2006) Exploring self-correlation in flux-gradient relationships for stably stratified conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 63:3045–3054Google Scholar
  4. Banta RM, Pichugina YL, Newsom RK (2003) Relationship between low-level jet properties and turbulence kinetic energy in the nocturnal stable boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60:2549–2555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banta RM (2008) Stable-boundary-layer regimes from the perspective of the low-level jet. Acta Geophys 56:58–87. doi: 10.2478/s11600-007-0049-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beljaars ACM, Holtslag AAM (1991) Flux parameterization over land surfaces for atmospheric models. J Appl Meteorol 30:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonin TA, Blumberg WG, Klein PM, Chilson PB (2015) Thermodynamic and turbulence characteristics of the Southern Great Plains nocturnal boundary layer under differing turbulent regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 157:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boussinesq J (1877) Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des Sciences 23(1):1–680Google Scholar
  9. Caulfield CP, Kerswell RR (2001) Maximal mixing rate in turbulent stably stratified Coutte flow. Phys Fluids 13:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etling D, Brown R (1993) Roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer: a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65:215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamba F (2005) Nonlocal analysis of the Reynolds stress in turbulent shear flow. Phys Fluids 17(11):102–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hicks BB (1978) Some limitations of dimensional analysis and power laws. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 14:567–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78(3–4):215–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Högström U, Hunt JCR, Smedman AS (2002) Theory and measurements for turbulence spectra and variances in the atmospheric neutral surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103:101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holliday D, McIntyre ME (1981) On potential energy density in an incompressible, stratified fluid. J Fluid Mech 107:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopfinger EJ (1987) Turbulence in stratified fluids: a review. J Geophys Res 92(C5):5287–5303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howell J (1995) Identifying sudden changes in data. Mon Weather Rev 123(4):1207–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell J, Mahrt L (1994) An adaptive multiresolution data filter: applications to turbulence and climatic time series. J Atmos Sci 51(4):2165–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howell JF, Sun J (1999) Surface-layer fluxes in stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:495–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King JC, Mobbs SD, Edwards NR (1994) Surface boundary conditions in stably-stratified environmental flows. In: Castro IP, Rochliff NJ (eds) Stably stratified flows: flow and dispersion over topography. Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, University of Surrey; Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 93–103Google Scholar
  22. Klipp CL, Mahrt L (2004) Flux-gradient relationship, self-correlation and intermittency in the stable boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:2087–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenschow DH, Zhang SF, Stankov BB (1988) The stably stratified boundary layer over the Great Plains I: mean and turbulence structure. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42:95–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindborg E (2006) The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid. J Fluid Mech 550:207–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin JT, Pao YH (1979) Wakes in stratified fluids. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 11:317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahrt L, Sun J, Blumen W, Delany T, Oncley S (1998) Nocturnal boundary-layer regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahrt L (2007) The influence of nonstationarity on the turbulent flux-gradient relationship for stable stratification. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125:245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahrt L (2008) Bulk formulation of surface fluxes extended to weak-wind stable conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahrt L (2009) Characteristics of submeso winds in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 130:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahrt L, Thomas C, Richardson S, Seaman N, Stauffer D, Zeeman M (2013) Non-stationary generation of weak turbulence for very stable and weak-wind conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(2):179–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahrt L, Sun J, Stauffer D (2015) Dependence of turbulent velocities on wind speed and stratification. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155(1):55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martins HS, Sá LD, Moraes OL (2013) Low level jets in the Pantanal wetland nocturnal boundary layer-case studies. Amer J Environ Eng 3(1):32–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNaughton K (2009) The rise and fall of Monin–Obukhov theory. AsiaFlux Newsletter 30:1–22Google Scholar
  34. Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the atmosphere near the ground. Trudy Geofiz Inst AN SSSR 24:163–187Google Scholar
  35. Obukhov AM (1946) Turbulence in an atmosphere with a non-uniform temperature. Trudy Instituta Teoreticheskio Geofiziki AN SSSR 1:95–115Google Scholar
  36. Ostrovsky L, Troitskaya YI (1987) A model of turbulent transfer and dynamics of turbulence in a stratified shear-flow. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR Fizika Atmosfery I Okeana 23(10):1031–1040Google Scholar
  37. Peña A, Gryning SE, Mann J (2010) On the length-scale of the wind profile. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:2119–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poulos GS, Blumen W, Fritts DC, Lundquist JK, Sun J, Burns SP, Nappo C, Banta R, Newsom R, Cuxart J, Terradellas E, Balsley B, Jensen M (2002) CASES-99—a comprehensive investigation of the stable nocturnal boundary layer. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 83:555–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prandtl L (1925) Report on investigation of developed turbulence. Tech. rep, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Memorandum No 1231Google Scholar
  40. Sanderse S, van der Pijl SP, Koren B (2011) Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Wind Energy 14:799–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitt F (2007) About Boussinesq’s turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity. Comptes Rendus Mecanique 335(9/10):617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Starr VP (1968) Physics of negative viscosity phenomena. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Stull RB (1984) Transilient turbulence theory. Part I: the concept of eddy-mixing across finite distances. J Atmos Sci 41(23):3351–3367Google Scholar
  44. Sun J, Esbensen SK, Mahrt L (1995) Estimation of surface heat flux. J Atmos Sci 52(17):3162–3171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun J, Burns SP, Lenschow DH, Banta R, Newsom R, Coulter R, Frasier S, Ince T, Nappo C, Cuxart J, Blumen W, Lee X, Hu XZ (2002) Intermittent turbulence associated with a density current passage in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 105:199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun J, Burns SP, Delany AC, Oncley SP, Horst TW, Lenschow DH (2003) Heat balance in nocturnal boundary layers during CASES-99. J Appl Meteorol 42:1649–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sun J (2007) Tilt corrections over complex terrain and their implication for CO\(_2\) transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun J (2011) Vertical variations of the mixing lengths during CASES-99. J Appl Meteor Clim 50:2030–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sun J, Mahrt L, Banta RM, Pichugina YL (2012) Turbulence regimes and turbulence intermittency in the stable boundary layer during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 69:338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun J, Lenschow DH, Mahrt L, Nappo C (2013) The relationships among wind, horizontal pressure gradient, and turbulent momentum transport during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 70:3397–3414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun J, Mahrt L, Nappo C, Lenschow DH (2015) Wind and temperature oscillations generated by wave-turbulence interactions in the stably stratified boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 72:1484–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun J, Mahrt L (1995) Determination of surface fluxes from the surface radiative temperature. J Atmos Sci 52(8):1096–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sun J, Massman W (1999) Ozone transport during the California ozone deposition experiment. J Geophys Res 104(D10):11,939–11,948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tennekes H, Lumley HL (1972) A first course in turbulence. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. van de Wiel B, Moene A, Steeneveld G, Hartogensis O, Holtslag A (2007) Predicting the collapse of turbulence in stably stratified boundary layers. Flow Turbul Combust 79(3):251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van de Wiel BJH, Moene AF, Jonker HJJ, Baas P, Basu S, Donda JMM, Sun J, Holtslag AAM (2012) The minimum wind speed for sustainable turbulence in the nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 69:3116–3127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Von Kármán T (1930) Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und turbulenz (Mechanical Similarity and Turbulence). Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen Math Phys KlasseGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99(1):127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams A, Hacker J (1992) The composite shape and structure of coherent eddies in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61(3):213–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zilitinkevich SS (1995) Non-local turbulent transport: pollution dispersion aspects of coherent structure of convective flows. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 6:53–60Google Scholar
  61. Zilitinkevich SS, Hunt J, Esau IN, Grachev A, Lalas D, Akylas E, Tombrou M, Fairall C, Fernando H, Baklanov A et al (2006) The influence of large convective eddies on the surface-layer turbulence. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132(618):1426–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zilitinkevich SS, Elperin T, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2007) Energy- and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure model for stably stratified flows. Part I: steady-state, homogeneous regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125:167–191Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jielun Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donald H. Lenschow
    • 1
  • Margaret A. LeMone
    • 1
  • Larry Mahrt
    • 2
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  2. 2.NorthWest Research AssociatesCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations