Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 157, Issue 2, pp 219–236 | Cite as

Wind-Tunnel Study of Scalar Transfer Phenomena for Surfaces of Block Arrays and Smooth Walls with Dry Patches

  • Juyeon Chung
  • Aya Hagishima
  • Naoki Ikegaya
  • Jun Tanimoto
Article

Abstract

We report the result of a wind-tunnel experiment to measure the scalar transfer efficiency of three types of surfaces, wet street surfaces of cube arrays, wet smooth surfaces with dry patches, and fully wet smooth surfaces, to examine the effects of roughness topography and scalar source allocation. Scalar transfer coefficients defined by the source area \({C}_{\mathrm{E\,wet}} \) for an underlying wet street surface of dry block arrays show a convex trend against the block density \(\lambda _\mathrm{p}\). Comparison with past data, and results for wet smooth surfaces including dry patches, reveal that the positive peak of \({C}_{\mathrm{E\,wet}}\) with increasing \(\lambda _\mathrm{p}\) is caused by reduced horizontal advection due to block roughness and enhanced evaporation due to a heterogeneous scalar source distribution. In contrast, scalar transfer coefficients defined by a lot-area including wet and dry areas \({C}_{\mathrm{E\,lot}}\) for smooth surfaces with dry patches indicate enhanced evaporation compared to the fully wet smooth surface (the oasis effect) for all three conditions of dry plan-area ratio up to 31 %. Relationships between the local Sherwood and Reynolds numbers derived from experimental data suggest that attenuation of \({C}_{\mathrm{E\,wet}}\) for a wet street of cube arrays against streamwise distance is weaker than for a wet smooth surface because of canopy flow around the blocks. Relevant parameters of ratio of roughness length for momentum to scalar \({B}^{-1}\) were calculated from observational data. The result implies that \({B}^{-1}\) possibly increases with block roughness, and decreases with the partitioning of the scalar boundary layer because of dry patches.

Keywords

Heterogeneity of source Scalar Source Scalar transfer coefficient Wind-tunnel experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Ken-Ichi Narita for his valuable suggestions and for allowing us to use the salinometer of his laboratory for this experiment. This project was partly funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 25289196). We would also like to thank the referees for careful reading of the manuscript and helpful comments.

References

  1. Anderson W (2013) Passive scalar roughness lengths for atmospheric boundary layer flow over complex, fractal topographies. Environ Fluid Mech 13:479–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow JF, Belcher SE (2002) A wind tunnel model for quantifying fluxes in the urban boundary layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 104:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow JF, Harman IN, Belcher SE (2004) Scalar fluxes from urban street canyons. Part 1: Laboratory simulation. Bound Layer Meteorol 113:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blocken B, Defraeye T, Derome D, Carmeliet J (2009) High-resolution CFD simulations for forced convective heat transfer coefficients at the facade of a low-rise building. Build Environ 44:2396–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brutsaert W (1975) A theory for local evaporation (or heat transfer) from rough and smooth surfaces at ground level. Water Resour Res 11:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamberlain AC (1968) Transport of gases to and from surfaces with bluff and wave-like roughness elements. Q J R Meteorol Soc 94:318–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Bound Layer Meteorol 104:229–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Defraeye T, Blocke B, Carmeliet J (2010) CFD analysis of convective heat transfer at the surfaces of a cube immersed in a turbulent boundary layer. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Defraeye T, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2011) Convective heat transfer coefficients for exterior building surfaces: existing correlations and CFD modelling. Energy Convers Manag 52:512–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, UK, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Garratt JR, Hicks BB (1973) Momentum heat and water vapour transfer to and from natural and artificial surfaces. Q J R Meteorol Soc 99:680–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38:1262–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Narita K (2005) Intercomparisons of experimental convective heat transfer coefficients and mass transfer coefficients of urban surfaces. Bound Layer Meteorol 117:551–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Nagayama K, Meno S (2009) Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Bound Layer Meteorol 132:315–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagishima A, Narita K, Tanimoto J (2007) Field experiment on transpiration from isolated urban plants. Hydrol Process 21:1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikegaya N, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Tanaka Y, Narita K, Zaki SA (2012) Geometric dependence of the scalar transfer efficiency over rough surface. Bound Layer Meteorol 143:357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Incropera F, DeWitt D (2002) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, 455 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanda M, Moriizumi T (2009) Momentum and heat transfer over urban-like surfaces. Bound Layer Meteorol 131:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanda M, Kanega M, Kawai T, Moriwaki R, Sugawara H (2007) Roughness lengths for momentum and heat derived from outdoor urban scale models. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1067–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanda M, Inagaki A, Miyamoto T, Gryschka M, Raasch S (2013) A new aerodynamic parametrization for real urban surfaces. Bound Layer Meteorol 148:357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macdonald RW, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (1998) An improved method for estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32:1857–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millward-Hopkins JT, Tomlin AS, Ma L, Ingham D, Pourkashanian M (2011) Estimating aerodynamic parameters of urban-like surfaces with heterogeneous building heights. Bound Layer Meteorol 141:443–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moriwaki R, Kanda M (2004) Seasonal and diurnal fluxes of radiation, heat, water vapor and CO2 over a suburban area. J Appl Meteorol 43:1700–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Narita K (2007) Experimental study of the transfer velocity for urban surfaces with a water evaporation method. Bound Layer Meteorol 122:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Owen PR, Thomson WR (1963) Heat transfer across rough surfaces. J Fluid Mech 15:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pascheke F, Barlow JF, Robins A (2008) Wind-tunnel modelling of dispersion from a scalar area source in urban-like roughness. Bound Layer Meteorol 126:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pillai SS, Yoshie R (2012) Experimental and numerical studies on convective heat transfer from various urban canopy configurations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106(4):447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zaki SA, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Ikegaya N (2011) Aerodynamic parameters of urban building arrays with random geometries. Bound Layer Meteorol 138:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juyeon Chung
    • 1
  • Aya Hagishima
    • 1
  • Naoki Ikegaya
    • 1
  • Jun Tanimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations