Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 146, Issue 2, pp 161–179

Wind-Turbine Wakes in a Convective Boundary Layer: A Wind-Tunnel Study

  • Wei Zhang
  • Corey D. Markfort
  • Fernando Porté-Agel


Thermal stability changes the properties of the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer, and in turn affects the behaviour of wind-turbine wakes. To better understand the effects of thermal stability on the wind-turbine wake structure, wind-tunnel experiments were carried out with a simulated convective boundary layer (CBL) and a neutral boundary layer. The CBL was generated by cooling the airflow to 12–15 °C and heating up the test section floor to 73–75 °C. The freestream wind speed was set at about 2.5 m s−1, resulting in a bulk Richardson number of −0.13. The wake of a horizontal-axis 3-blade wind-turbine model, whose height was within the lowest one third of the boundary layer, was studied using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (S-PIV) and triple-wire (x-wire/cold-wire) anemometry. Data acquired with the S-PIV were analyzed to characterize the highly three-dimensional turbulent flow in the near wake (0.2–3.2 rotor diameters) as well as to visualize the shedding of tip vortices. Profiles of the mean flow, turbulence intensity, and turbulent momentum and heat fluxes were measured with the triple-wire anemometer at downwind locations from 2–20 rotor diameters in the centre plane of the wake. In comparison with the wake of the same wind turbine in a neutral boundary layer, a smaller velocity deficit (about 15 % at the wake centre) is observed in the CBL, where an enhanced radial momentum transport leads to a more rapid momentum recovery, particularly in the lower part of the wake. The velocity deficit at the wake centre decays following a power law regardless of the thermal stability. While the peak turbulence intensity (and the maximum added turbulence) occurs at the top-tip height at a downwind distance of about three rotor diameters in both cases, the magnitude is about 20 % higher in the CBL than in the neutral boundary layer. Correspondingly, the turbulent heat flux is also enhanced by approximately 25 % in the lower part of the wake, compared to that in the undisturbed CBL inflow. This study represents the first controlled wind-tunnel experiment to study the effects of the CBL on wind-turbine wakes. The results on decreased velocity deficit and increased turbulence in wind-turbine wakes associated with atmospheric thermal stability are important to be taken into account in the design of wind farms, in order to reduce the impact of wakes on power output and fatigue loads on downwind wind turbines.


Atmospheric boundary layer Convective boundary layer Thermal stability Wind-tunnel experiment Wind-turbine wakes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29: 275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker RW, Walker SN (1984) Wake measurements behind a large horizontal axis wind turbine generator. Solar Energy 33: 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthelmie R, Larsen G, Pryor S, Jorgensen H, Bergstrom H, Schlez W, Rados K, Lange B, Volund P, Neckelmann S, Mogensen S, Schepers G, Hegberg T, Folkerts L, Magnusson M (2004) ENDOW (efficient development of offshore wind farms): modelling wake and boundary layer interactions. Wind Energy 7: 225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cal RB, Lebrón J, Castillo L, Kang HS, Meneveau C (2010) Experimental study of the horizontally averaged flow structure in a model wind-turbine array boundary layer. J Renew Sustain Energy 2: 013,106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carper MA, Porté-Agel F (2008) Subfilter-scale fluxes over a surface roughness transition Part I: measured fluxes and energy transfer rates. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126: 157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamorro LP, Porté-Agel F (2009) A wind-tunnel investigation of wind-turbine wakes: boundary-layer turbulence effects. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(1): 129–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamorro LP, Porté-Agel F (2010) Thermal stability and boundary-layer effects on wind-turbine wakes: a wind-tunnel study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136: 515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deardorff JW (1970) Convective velocity and temperature scales for the unstable planetary boundary layer and for Raleigh convection. J Atmos Sci 27: 1211–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobrev I, Maalouf B, Troldborg N, Massouh F (2008) Investigation of the wind turbine vortex structure. In: 14th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  10. Fedorovich E, Kaiser R, Rau M, Plate E (1996) Wind tunnel study of turbulent flow structure in the convective boundary layer capped by a temperature inversion. J Atmos Sci 53: 1273–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fedorovich E, Nieuwstart FTM, Kaiser R (2001a) Numerical and laboratory study of a horizontally evolving convective boundary layer. Part I: Transition regimes and cevelopment of the mixed Layer. J Atmos Sci 58: 70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fedorovich E, Nieuwstart FTM, Kaiser R (2001b) Numerical and laboratory study of a horizontally evolving convective boundary layer. Part II: effects of elevated wind shear and surface roughness. J Atmos Sci 58: 546–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frandsen S, Barthelmie R, Pryor S, Rathmann O, Larsen S, Hojstrup J, Thogersen M (2006) Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 9: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, U.K., p 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Hancock PE, Pascheke F (2010) Wind tunnel simulations of wind turbine wake interactions in neutral and stratified wind flow. In: 10th EMS annual meeting, 10th European conference on applications of meteorology (ECAM), Sept 13–17, 2010 in Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. Högström U, Asimakopoulos DN, Kambezidis H, Helmis CG, Smedman A (1988) A field study of the wake behind a 2 MW wind turbine. Atmos Environ 22(4): 803–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchins N, Nickels TB, Marusic I, Chong MS (2009) Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J Fluid Mech 635: 103–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jorgensen FE (1996) The computer-controlled constant temperature ameometer: aspectes of the set-up, probe calibration, data acquisition, and data collection turbulence. Meas Sci Technol 12: 1378–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lebrón J, Castillo L, Cal RB, Kang HS, Meneveau C (2010) Interaction between a wind turbine array and a turbulent boundary layer. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition 4–7 January 2010, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnusson M, Smedman AS (1994) Influence of atmospheric stablity on wind turbine wakes. Wind Energy 18: 139–152Google Scholar
  21. Magnusson M, Smedman AS (1999) Air flow behind wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 80: 169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Medici D, Alfredsson PH (2006) Measurements on a wind turbine wake: 3D effects and bluff body vortex shedding. Wind Energy 9: 219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meroney RN, Melbourne WH (1992) Operating ranges of meteorological wind tunnels for the simulation of convective boundary layer (CBL) phenomena. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61: 145–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohya Y (2001) Wind-tunnel study of atmospheric stable boundary layers over a rough surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98: 57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohya Y, Uchida T (2004) Laboratory and numerical studies of the convective boundary layer capped by a strong inversion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112: 223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porté-Agel F, Lu H, Wu YT, Conzemius RJ (2011) Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99: 154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherry M, Sheridan J, Jacono DL (2010) Horizontal axis wind turbine tip and root vortex measurements. In: 15th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 5–8 JulyGoogle Scholar
  28. Sørensen JN (2011) Aerodynamic aspects of wind energy conversion. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43: 427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stull R (1988) An introduction to boundary-layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 666 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Berg GP (2008) Wind turbine power and sound in relation to atmospheric stability. Wind Energy 11: 151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vermeer LJ (2001) A review of wind turbine wake research at TUDelft. In: Proceedings of ASME Wind Energy Symposium, ASME, New York, AIAA-2001-0030, vol 39, pp 103–113Google Scholar
  32. Vermeer LJ, Sørensen JN, Crespo A (2003) Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Prog Aero Sci 39: 467–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whale J, Papadopoulos KH, Anderson CG, Helmis CG, Skyner DJ (1997) A study of the near wake structure of a wind turbine comparing measurements from laboratory and full-scale experiments. Solar Energy 56: 621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whale J, Anderson CG, Bareiss R, Wagner S (2000) An experimental and numerical study of the vortex structure in the wake of a wind turbine. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 84: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wharton S, Lundquist JK (2010) Atmospheric stability impacts on power curves of tall wind turbines an analysis of a west coast North American wind farm. LLNL-TR-424425Google Scholar
  36. Wu YT, Porté-Agel F (2011) Large-eddy simulation of wind-turbine wakes: evaluation of turbine parametrisations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132: 129–149Google Scholar
  37. Zhang W, Markfort CM, Porté-Agel F (2012) Near-wake flow structure downwind of a wind turbine in a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 52: 1219–1235. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1250-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech 387: 353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Zhang
    • 1
  • Corey D. Markfort
    • 1
  • Fernando Porté-Agel
    • 2
  1. 1.Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Wind Engineering and Renewable Energy Laboratory (WIRE)École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), EPFL-ENAC-IIE-WIRELausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations