Concurrency of Coherent Structures and Conditionally Sampled Daytime Sub-canopy Respiration
- 405 Downloads
We investigated an alternative means for quantifying daytime ecosystem respiration from eddy-covariance data in three forests with different canopy architecture. Our hypothesis was that the turbulent transport by coherent structures is the main pathway for carrying detectable sub-canopy respiration signals through the canopy. The study extends previously published work by incorporating state-of-the-art wavelet decomposition techniques for the detection of coherent structures. Further, we investigated spatial and temporal variability of the respiration signal and coherent exchange at multiple heights, for three mature forest sites with varying canopy and terrain properties for one summer month. A connection between the coherent structures and identified sub-canopy respiration signal was clearly determined. Although not always visible in signals collected above the canopy, certain cases showed a clear link between conditionally sampled respiration events and coherent structures. The dominant time scales of the coherent structure ejection phase (20–30 s), relative timing of maximum coincidence between respiration events and the coherent structure ejection phase (at approximately −10 s from detection) and vertical transport upward through the canopy were shown to be consistent in time, across measurement heights and across the different forest sites. Best results were observed for an open canopy pine site. We conclude that the presented method is likely to be applicable at more open rather than dense (closed) canopies. The results provided a confirmation of the connection between below- and above-canopy scalar time series, and may help the development or refinement of direct methods for the determination of component fluxes from observations above the canopy.
KeywordsConditional sampling Eddy covariance Flux partitioning Wavelet decomposition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Goeckede M, Foken T, Aubinet M, Aurela M, Banza J, Bernhofer C, Bonnefond JM, Brunet Y, Carrara A, Clement R, Dellwik E, Elbers J, Eugster W, Fuhrer J, Granier A, Grunwald T, Heinesch B, Janssens IA, Knohl A, Koeble R, Laurila T, Longdoz B, Manca G, Marek M, Markkanen T, Mateus J, Matteucci G, Mauder M, Migliavacca M, Minerbi S, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Moors E, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pereira J, Pilegaard K, Pita G, Rambal S, Rebmann C, Rodrigues A, Rotenberg E, Sanz MJ, Sedlak P, Seufert G, Siebicke L, Soussana JF, Valentini R, Vesala T, Verbeeck H, Yakir D (2008) Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. 1. Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems. Biogeosciences 5(2): 433–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lasslop G, Reichstein M, Papale D, Richardson AD, Arneth A, Barr A, Stoy P, Wohlfahrt G (2010) Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation. Global Change Biol 16(1): 187–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Misson L, Baldocchi D, Black T, Blanken P, Brunet Y, Yuste JC, Dorsey J, Falk M, Granier A, Irvine M, Jarosz N, Lamaud E, Launiainen S, Law B, Longdoz B, Loustau D, McKay M, Paw U K, Vesala T, Vickers D, Wilson K, Goldstein A (2007) Partitioning forest carbon fluxes with overstory and understory eddy-covariance measurements: a synthesis based on FLUXNET data. Agric For Meteorol 144(1–2):14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.01.006
- Thomas C, Martin J, Goeckede M, Siqueira M, Foken T, Law B, Loescher H, Katul G (2008) Estimating daytime subcanopy respiration from conditional sampling methods applied to multi-scalar high frequency turbulence time series. Agric For Meteorol 148: 1210–1229. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilczak JM, Businger JA (1984) Large-scale eddies in the unstably stratified atmospheric surface layer. 2. Turbulent pressure fluctuations and the budgets of heat flux, stress and turbulent kinetic energy. J Atmos Sci 41(24): 3551–3567. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<3551:LSEITU>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar