Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 144, Issue 1, pp 65–81 | Cite as

Response of London’s Urban Heat Island to a Marine Air Intrusion in an Easterly Wind Regime

  • Charles Chemel
  • Ranjeet S. Sokhi
Article

Abstract

Numerical simulations are conducted using the Weather Research and Forecast numerical model to examine the effects of a marine air intrusion (including a sea-breeze front), in an easterly wind regime on 7 May 2008, on the structure of London’s urban heat island (UHI). A sensitivity study is undertaken to assess how the representation of the urban area of London in the model, with a horizontal grid resolution of 1 km, affects its performance characteristics for the near-surface air temperature, dewpoint depression, and wind fields. No single simulation is found to provide the overall best or worst performance for all the near-surface fields considered. Using a multilayer (rather than single layer or bulk) urban canopy model does not clearly improve the prediction of the intensity of the UHI but it does improve the prediction of its spatial pattern. Providing surface-cover fractions leads to improved predictions of the UHI intensity. The advection of cooler air from the North Sea reduces the intensity of the UHI in the windward suburbs and displaces it several kilometres to the west, in good agreement with observations. Frontal advection across London effectively replaces the air in the urban area. Results indicate that there is a delicate balance between the effects of thermal advection and urbanization on near-surface fields, which depend, inter alia, on the parametrization of the urban canopy and the urban land-cover distribution.

Keywords

Numerical simulations Sea breeze Sensitivity experiments Urban parametrization schemes Urban heat island 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol 23: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arritt RW (1993) Effects of the large-scale flow on characteristics features of the sea breeze. J Appl Meteorol 32: 116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkins NT, Wakimoto RM (1997) Influence of the synoptic-scale flow on sea breezes observed during CaPE. Mon Weather Rev 125: 2112–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechtold P, Pinty JP, Mascart P (1991) A numerical investigation of the influence of large-scale winds on sea-breeze- and inland-breeze-type circulations. J Appl Meteorol 30: 1268–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnenstengel SI, Evans S, Clark PA, Belcher SE (2011) Simulations of the London urban heat island. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 137: 1625–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bougeault P, Lacarrére P (1989) Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon Weather Rev 117: 1872–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandler TJ (1962) London’s urban climate. Geogr J 128: 279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129: 569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen F, Kusaka H, Bornstein R, Ching J, Grimmond CSB, Grossman-Clarke S, Loridan T, Manning KW, Martilli A, Miao S, Sailor D, Salamanca FP, Taha H, Tewari M, Wang X, Wyszogrodzki AA, Zhang C (2011) The integrated WRF/urban modelling system: development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems. Int J Climatol 31: 273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox R, Bauer BL, Smith T (1998) A mesoscale model intercomparison. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79: 265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crosman ET, Horel JD (2010) Sea and lake breezes: a review of numerical studies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137: 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damato F, Planchon O, Dubreuil V (2003) A remote-sensing study of the inland penetration of sea-breeze fronts from the English Channel. Weather 58: 219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dandou A, Tombrou M, Soulakellis N (2009) The influence of the City of Athens on the evaluation of the sea breeze front. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131: 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drazin PG (1958) The stability of a shear layer in an unbounded heterogeneous inviscid fluid. J Fluid Mech 4: 214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eastwood E, Rider GC (1961) A radar observation of a sea-breeze front. Nature 189: 978–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estoque MA (1962) The sea breeze as a function of the prevailing synoptic situation. J Atmos Sci 19: 244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Findlater J (1964) The sea-breeze and inland convection. Meteorol Mag 93: 82–89Google Scholar
  18. Freitas ED, Rozoff CM, Cotton WM, Silvia Dias PL (2007) Interactions of an urban heat island and sea breeze circulations during winter over the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122: 43–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galperin B, Sukoriansky S, Anderson PS (2007) On the critical Richardson number in stably stratified turbulence. Atmos Sci Let 8: 65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gedzelman SD, Austin S, Cermak R, Stefano N, Partridge S, Quesenberry S, Robinson DA (2003) Mesoscale aspects of the Urban Heat Island around New York City. Theor Appl Climatol 75: 29–42Google Scholar
  21. Gemmill W, Katz B, Li X (2007) Daily real-time global sea surface temperature—high-resolution analysis: RTG_SST_HR. NCEP/EMC Office Note No. 260, NOAA/NCEP, Camp Springs, 39 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Giridharan R, Kolokotroni M (2009) Urban heat island characteristics in london during winter. Sol Energy 83: 1668–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grell GA, Dévényi D (2002) A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys Res Lett 121:D14/1693Google Scholar
  24. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, Barlow J, 30 co-authors (2010) The international urban energy balance models comparison project: first results from Phase 1. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:1268–1292Google Scholar
  25. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, 33 co-authors (2011) Initial results from Phase 2 of the international urban energy balance model comparison. Int J Climatol 31:244–272Google Scholar
  26. Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard SA, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res 113: D13103. doi: 10.1029/2008JD009944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolokotroni M, Giridharan R (2008) Urban heat island intensity in London: an investigation of the impact of physical characteristics on changes in outdoor air temperature during summer. Sol Energy 82: 986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kusaka H, Kimura F (2004) Coupling a single-layer urban canopy model with a simple atmospheric model: impact on urban heat island simulation for an idealized case. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 82: 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kusaka H, Kimura F, Hirakuchi H, Mizutori M (2000) The effects of land-use alteration on the sea breeze and daytime heat island in the Tokyo metropolitan area. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 78: 405–420Google Scholar
  30. Kusaka H, Kondo H, Kikegawa Y, Kimura F (2001) A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: comparison with multi-layer and slab models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101: 329–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee SH, Kim SW, Angevine WM, Bianco L, McKeen SA, Senff CJ, Trainer M, Tucker SC, Zamora RJ (2011) Evaluation of urban surface parameterizations in the WRF model using measurements during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006 field campaign. Atmos Chem Phys 11: 2127–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lemonsu A, Bastin S, Masson V, Drobinski P (2006) Vertical structure of the urban boundary layer over Marseille under sea-breeze conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118: 477–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Y, Chen F, Warner T, Basara J (2006) Verification of a mesoscale data-assimilation and forecasting system for the Oklahoma City area during the Joint Urban 2003 field project. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45: 912–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall WAL (1950) Sea-breeze across London. Meteorol Mag 79: 165–168Google Scholar
  35. Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterization for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masson V (2006) Urban surface modeling and the meso-scale impact of cities. Theor Appl Climatol 84: 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller STK, Keim BD, Talbot RW, Mao H (2003) Sea breeze: structure, forecasting, and impacts. Rev Geophys 41: 1011. doi: 10.1029/2003RG000124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V (2009) Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one and two-moment schemes. Mon Weather Rev 137: 991–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ohashi Y, Kida H (2002) Local circulations developed in the vicinity of both coastal and inland urban areas: a numerical study with a mesoscale atmospheric model. J Appl Meteorol 41: 30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohashi Y, Kida H (2004) Local circulations developed in the vicinity of both coastal and inland urban areas. Part II: effects of urban and mountain areas on moisture transport. J Appl Meteorol 43: 119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 108: 1–24Google Scholar
  42. Plant RS, Keith GJ (2007) Occurence of Kelvin–Helmholtz billows in sea-breeze circulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rotach MW (1993) Turbulence close to a rough urban surface, part II: variances and gradients. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 66: 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salamanca F, Martilli A (2010) A new Building Energy Model coupled with an Urban Canopy Parameterization for urban climate simulations—part II: validation with one dimension off-line simulations. Theor Appl Climatol 99: 345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salamanca F, Martilli A, Tewari M, Chen F (2011) A study of the urban boundary layer using different urban parameterizations and high-resolution urban canopy parameters with wrf. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 50: 1107–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sarkar A, De Ridder K (2011) The urban heat island intensity of Paris: a case study based on a simple urban surface parametrization. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138: 511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlünzen KH, Sokhi RS (2008) Overview of tools and methods for meteorological and air pollution mesoscale model evaluation and user training. Joint Report of COST Action 728 and GURME, GAW Report No. 181, WMO/TD-No. 1457, WMO, Geneva, 121 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Simpson JE, Mansfield DA, Milford JR (1977) Inland penetration of sea-breeze fronts. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 103: 47–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, NCAR, Boulder, 125 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Stauffer DR, Seaman N (1990) Use of Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon Weather Rev 118: 1250–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sumner GN (1977) Sea breeze occurrence in hilly terrain. Weather 32: 200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thompson WT, Holt T, Pullen J (2007) Investigation of a sea breeze front in an urban environment. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 133: 579–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UK Meteorological Office (2006) MIDAS Land Surface Stations data (1853–current). NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre. http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/view/badc.nerc.ac.uk__ATOM__dataent_ukmo-midas. Accessed 2 Feb 2012
  54. Watkins R, Palmer J, Kolokotroni M, Littlefair P (2002) The London Heat Island: results from summertime monitoring. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 23: 97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yoshikado H (1990) Vertical structure of the sea breeze penetrating through a large urban complex. J Appl Meteorol 29: 878–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yoshikado H (1992) Numerical study of the daytime urban effect and its interaction with the sea breeze. J Appl Meteorol 31: 1146–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhong S, Takle ES (1993) The effects of large-scale winds on the sea-land-breeze circulations in an area of complex coastal heating. J Appl Meteorol 32: 1181–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Centre for Atmospheric & Instrumentation Research (CAIR)University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations