Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 143, Issue 3, pp 409–432 | Cite as

Effects of Mesoscale Surface Thermal Heterogeneity on Low-Level Horizontal Wind Speeds

Article

Abstract

Using large-eddy simulation, we investigate characteristics of horizontal wind speed at 100 m above the ground, with surface heat-flux variations that are sinusoidal with amplitudes of 0, 50, and 200 W m−2 and wavelengths of 16, 32, and 128 km, and no background flow. When the amplitude is 200 W m−2, wind speeds induced by the surface-flux variations on scales of 16 and/or 32 km have multiple temporal oscillations from 0600 to 1800 local standard time. The positive peaks first appear before noon. In contrast, for wind speeds induced by the 128-km surface heterogeneity, a single oscillation occurs in the late afternoon, which is much larger than those generated by the 16- and 32-km surface heterogeneity. In addition, at the oscillation onset the kurtosis of the velocity increment over a distance of 1 km significantly increases, which implies intermittency in the generation of 1-km scale eddies. The spatially intermittent energy cascade generated by surface heterogeneity scaled down to 1-km eddies is analogous to the well-known intermittent energy cascade in the inertial subrange. The kurtosis of the 1-km eddies is much larger with the 128-km surface heterogeneity than with the 16- and 32-km heterogeneities. Thus we conclude that localized rapid changes of low-level horizontal wind speed may be caused by significant local surface heterogeneity on scales between a few tens and a few hundreds of kilometres.

Keywords

Diurnal evolution Energy cascade Horizontal wind Large-eddy simulation Surface-flux heterogeneity Temporal oscillation Velocity increment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthes RA (1984) Enhancement of convective precipitation by mesoscale variations in vegetative covering in semiarid regions. J Appl Meteorol 23: 541–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avissar R, Schmidt T (1998) An evaluation of the scale at which ground-surface heat flux patchiness affects the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 55: 2666–2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldi M, Dalu GA, Pielke RA (2008) Vertical velocities and available potential energy generated by landscape variability-theory. J Appl Meteorol 47: 397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böttcher F, Renner C, Waldl HP, Peinke J (2003) On the statistics of wind gusts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böttcher F, Barth St, Penike J (2007) Small and large scale fluctuations in atmospheric wind speeds. Stoch Env Res Ris Assess 21: 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan GH, Fritsch JM (2002) A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon Weather Rev 130: 2917–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan GH, Wyngaard JC, Fritsch JM (2003) Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon Weather Rev 131: 2394–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen F, Avissar F (1994) The impact of land-surface wetness heterogeneity on mesoscale heat fluxes. J Appl Meteorol 33: 1323–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courault D, Seguin B, Olioso A (2005) Review about estimation of evapotranspiration from remote sensing data: from empirical to numerical modeling approach. Irrig Drain Syst 19: 223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalu GA, Pielke RA (1993) Vertical heat fluxes generated by mesoscale atmospheric flow induced by thermal inhomogeneities in the PBL. J Atmos Sci 50: 919–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson PA (2004) Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 653 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis JC, Collier CG, Davies F, Bozier KE (2008) Spatial variations of sensible heat flux over an urban area measured using Doppler lidar. Meteorol Appl 15: 367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18: 495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durran DR, Klemp JB (1983) A compressible model for the simulation of moist mountain waves. Mon Weather Rev 111: 2341–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esau IN (2007) Amplification of turbulent exchange over wide arctic leads: large-eddy simulation study. J Geophys Res 112: D08109. doi:10.1029/2006JD007225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fedorovich E, Conzemius R, Esau F, Chow K, Lewellen D, Moeng C-H, Pino D, Sullivan P, Vilá-Guerau de Arellano J (2004) Entrainment into sheared convective boundary layers as predicted by different large eddy simulation codes. Preprints. In: 16th Symposium on boundary layers and turbulence, American Meteorological Society, 9–13 August, Portland, Maine, USA, CD-ROM, P4.7Google Scholar
  17. Findell KL, Eltahir AB (2003) Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part I: Framework development. J Hydrometeorol 4: 552–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frisch U (1995) Turbulence: the legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 296 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Giebel G (2003) The state-of-the-art in short-term prediction of wind power: a literature overview. Project Anemos, Riso National Laboratory Tech. Rep., Roskilde, Denmark, 36 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Gotoh T (2001) Turbulence research at large Reynolds numbers using high resolution DNS. RIKEN Rev 40: 3–6Google Scholar
  21. Hidalgo J, Pigeon G, Masson V (2008) Urban-breeze circulation during the CAPITOUL experiment: observational data analysis approach. Meteorol Atmos Phys 102: 223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hidalgo J, Masson V, Gimeno L (2010) Scaling the daytime urban heat island and urban-breeze circulation. J Appl Meteorol 49: 889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holt TR, Niyogi D, Chen F, Manning K, LeMone MA, Qureshi A (2006) Effect of land–atmosphere interactions on the IHOP 24–25 May 2002 convection case. Mon Weather Rev 134: 113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Honnert R, Masson V, Couvreux F (2011) A diagnostic for evaluating the representation of turbulence in atmospheric models at the kilometric scale. J Atmos Sci. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-061.1
  25. Inoue J, Kawashima M, Fujiyoshi Y, Wakatsuchi M (2005) Aircraft observations of air-mass modification over the sea of Okhotsk during sea-ice growth. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 117: 111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang S-L (2009) Temporal oscillations in the convective boundary layer forced by mesoscale surface heat-flux variations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132: 59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang S-L, Bryan GH (2011) A large eddy simulation study on moist convection initiation over heterogeneous surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 139: 2901–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang S-L, Davis KJ (2008) The effects of mesoscale surface heterogeneity on the fair-weather convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 65: 3197–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kang S-L, Davis KJ, LeMone M (2007) Observations of the ABL structures over a heterogeneous land surface during IHOP_2002. J Hydrometeorol 8: 221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimmel SJ, Wyngaard JC, Otte MJ (2002) “Log-Chipper” turbulence in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 59: 1124–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolmogorov AN (1941) Energy dissipation in locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 32: 19–21Google Scholar
  32. Lauren MK, Menabde M, Seed AW, Austin GL (1999) Characterization and simulation of the multiscaling properties of the energy-containing scales of horizontal surface-layer winds. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90: 21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lauren MK, Menabde M, Austin GL (2001) Analysis and simulation of surface-layer winds using multiplicative cascade models with self-similar probability densities. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 100: 263–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lenschow DH, Stankov BB (1986) Length scales in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 43: 1198–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Letzel MO, Raasch S (2003) Large eddy simulation of thermally induced oscillations in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60: 2328–2340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindborg E (1999) Can the atmospheric kinetic energy spectrum be explained by two-dimensional turbulence?. J Fluid Mech 388: 259–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu G, Sun J, Yin L (2011) Turbulence characteristics of the shear-free convective boundary layer driven by heterogeneous surface heating. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140: 57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahrt L, Sun J, Vickers D, MacPherson JI, Pederson JR, Desjardins RL (1994) Observations of fluxes and inland breezes over a heterogeneous surface. J Atmos Sci 51: 2484–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martínez D, Jiménez MA, Cuxart J, Mahrt L (2010) Heterogeneous nocturnal cooling in a large basin under very stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137: 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moeng C-H, Wyngaard JC (1988) Spectra analysis of large-eddy simulations of the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 45: 3573–3587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1975). Statistical fluid mechanics. MIT Press, Cambridge, 874 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Muzy J-F, Baile R, Poggi P (2010) Intermittency of surface-layer wind velocity series in the mesoscale range. Phys Rev E 81: 056308. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raasch S, Harbusch G (2001) An analysis of secondary circulations and their effects caused by small-scale inhomogeneities using large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101: 31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rohrig K, Lange B (2007) Improvement of the power system reliability by prediction of wind power generation. In: Power Engineering Society general meeting, IEEE, 24–28 June 2007, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  45. Rotunno R (1983) On the linear theory of the land and sea breeze. J Atmos Sci 40: 1999–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shen S, Leclerc MY (1995) How large must surface inhomogeneities be before they influence the convective boundary layer structure? A case study. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121: 1209–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 670 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Vindel JM, Yague C, Redondo JM (2008) Structure function analysis and intermittency in the atmospheric boundary layer. Nonlinear Proc Geophys 15: 915–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang W (2009) The influence of thermally-induced circulations on turbulence statistics over an idealized urban area under a zero background wind. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131: 403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang J, Bars RL, Eltahir EA (1996) A stochastic linear theory of mesoscale circulation induced by the thermal heterogeneity of the land surface. J Atmos Sci 53: 3349–3366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weaver CP, Avissar R (2001) Atmospheric disturbances caused by human modification of the landscape. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82: 269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weckwerth TM et al (2004) An overview of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and some preliminary highlights. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85: 253–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wicker LJ, Skamarock WC (2002) Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Mon Weather Rev 130: 2088–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wyngaard JC, Peltier LJ, Khanna S (1998) LES in the surface layer: surface fluxes, scaling, and SGS modeling. J Atmos Sci 55: 1733–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang CL, Chen F, Miao SG, Li QC, Xia XA, Xuan CY (2009) Impacts of urban expansion and future green planting on summer precipitation in the Beijing metropolitan area. J Geophys Res 114(D2): D02116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song-Lak Kang
    • 1
  • Donald Lenschow
    • 2
  • Peter Sullivan
    • 2
  1. 1.Atmospheric Science Group, Department of GeosciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations