Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 140, Issue 2, pp 315–342 | Cite as

Further Development of the Vegetated Urban Canopy Model Including a Grass-Covered Surface Parametrization and Photosynthesis Effects

  • Sang-Hyun Lee
Article

Abstract

The vegetated urban canopy model (VUCM), which includes parametrizations of urban physical processes for artificial surfaces and vegetated areas in an integrated system, has been further developed by including physical processes associated with grass-covered surfaces in urban pervious surfaces and the photosynthesis effects of urban vegetation. Using measurements made from three urban/suburban sites during the BUBBLE field campaign in 2002, the model’s performance in modelling surface fluxes (momentum flux, net radiation, sensible and latent heat fluxes and storage heat flux) and canopy air conditions (canopy air temperature and specific humidity) was critically evaluated for the non-precipitation and the precipitation days. The observed surface fluxes at the urban/suburban sites were significantly altered by precipitation as well as urban vegetation. Especially, the storage heat at urban surfaces and underlying substrates varied drastically depending on weather conditions while having an important role in the formation of a nocturnal urban surface layer. Unlike the nighttime canopy air temperature that was largely affected by the storage-heat release, the daytime canopy air conditions were highly influenced by the vertical turbulent exchange with the overlying atmosphere. The VUCM well reproduced these observed features in surface fluxes and canopy air conditions at all sites while performing well for both the non-precipitation and the precipitation days. The newly implemented parametrizations clearly improved the model’s performance in the simulation of sensible and latent heat fluxes at the sites, more noticeably at the suburban site where the vegetated area fraction is the largest among the sites. Sensitivity analyses for model input parameters in VUCM elucidated the relative importance of the morphological, aerodynamic, hydrological and radiative/thermal properties in modelling urban surface fluxes and canopy air conditions for daytime and nighttime periods. These results suggest that the VUCM has great potential for urban atmospheric numerical modelling for a range of cities and weather conditions in addition to having a better physical basis in the representation of urban vegetated areas and associated physical processes.

Keywords

Land-surface model Surface energy balance Urban boundary layer Urban canopy model Urban climate Urban vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allwine K, Shinn J, Streit G, Clawson K, Brown M (2002) Overview of URBAN 2000: a multiscale field study of dispersion through an urban environment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83: 521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asrar G, Fuchs M, Kanemasu E, Hatfield J (1984) Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat. Agron J 76: 300–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christen A (2005) Atmospheric turbulence and surface energy exchange in urban environments. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Basel, Switzerland, 130 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Christen A, Vogt R (2004) Energy and radiation balance of a central European city. Int J Climatol 24: 1395–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christen A, Vogt R, Rotach MW (2009) The budget of turbulent kinetic energy in the urban roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131: 193–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clapp RB, Hornberger GM (1978) Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour Res 14: 601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickinson R (1984) Climate processes and climate sensitivity. Modeling evapotranspiration for three-dimensional global climate models. Geophys Monogr, No. 29, pp 58–72Google Scholar
  8. Dupont E, Menut L, Carissimo B, Pelon J, Flament P (1999) Comparison between atmospheric boundary layer in Paris and its rural suburbs during the ECLAP experiment. Atmos Environ 33: 979–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flament P, Sawyer M (1995) Observations of the effect of rain temperature on the surface heat flux in the intertropical convergence zone. J Phys Oceanogr 25: 413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 316 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimmond CSB, Souch C, Hubble M (1996) Influence of tree cover on summertime surface energy balance fluxes, San Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles. Clim Res 6: 45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, Baik J-J, Belcher SE, Beringer J, Bohnenstengel SI, Calmet I, Chen F, Coutts A, Dandou A, Fortuniak K, Gouvea ML, Hamdi R, Hendry M, Kanda M, Kawai T, Kawamoto Y, Kondo H, Krayenhoff ES, Lee S-H, Loridan T, Martilli A, Masson V, Miao S, Oleson K, Ooka R, Pigeon G, Porson A, Ryu Y-H, Salamanca F, Steeneveld GJ, Tombrou M, Voogt JA, Young D, Zhang N (2010a) Initial results from Phase 2 of the international urban energy balance model comparison. Int J Climatol 31: 244–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, Barlow J, Baik J-J, Belcher SE, Bohnenstengel SI, Calmet I, Chen F, Dandou A, Fortuniak K, Gouvea ML, Hamdi R, Hendry M, Kawai T, Kawamoto Y, Kondo H, Krayenhoff ES, Lee S-H, Loridan T, Martilli A, Masson V, Miao S, Oleson K, Pigeon G, Porson A, Ryu Y-H, Salamanca F, Shashua-Bar L, Steeneveld G-J, Tombrou M, Voogt J, Young D, Zhang N (2010b) The international urban energy balance models comparison project: first results from phase 1. J Appl Meteorol Clim 49: 1268–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamdi R, Masson V (2008) Inclusion of a drag approach in the Town Energy Balance (TEB) scheme: offline 1-D evaluation in a street canyon. J Appl Meteorol Clim 47: 2627–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamdi R, Schayes G (2007) Validation of Martilli’s urban boundary layer scheme with measurements from two mid-latitude European cities. Atmos Chem Phys 8: 4513–4526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoyano A (1988) Climatological uses of plants for solar control and the effects on the thermal environment of a building. Energy Build 11: 181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawai T, Kanda M (2010) Urban energy balance obtained from the comprehensive outdoor scale model experiment. Part I: Basic features of the surface energy balance. J Appl Meteorol Clim 49: 1341–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kawai T, Ridwan M, Kanda M (2009) Evaluation of the simple urban energy balance model using selected data from 1-yr flux observations at two cities. J Appl Meteorol Clim 48: 693–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kusaka H, Kondo H, Kikegawa Y, Kimura F (2001) A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: comparison with multi-layer and slab models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101: 329–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee S-H, Baik J-J (2011) Evaluation of the vegetated urban canopy model (VUCM) and its impacts on urban boundary layer simulation. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 47: 151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee S-H, Park S-U (2008) A vegetated urban canopy model for meteorological and environmental modelling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126: 73–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee S-H, Song C-K, Baik J-J, Park S-U (2009) Estimation of anthropogenic heat emission in the Gyeong-In region of Korea. Theor Appl Climatol 96: 291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martilli A (2009) On the derivation of input parameters for urban canopy models from urban morphological datasets. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 130: 301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach M (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterization for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masson V (2000) A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94: 357–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mestayer PG, Durand P, Augustin P, Bastin S, Bonnefond J-M, Benech B, Campistron B, Coppalle A, Delbarre H, Dousset B, Drobinski P, Druilhet A, Frejafon E, Grimmond CSB, Groleau D, Irvine M, Kergomard C, Kermadi S, Lagouarde J-P, Lemonsu A, Lohou F, Long N, Masson V, Moppert C, Noilhan J, Offerle B, Oke TR, Pigeon G, Puygrenier V, Roberts S, Rosant J-M, Said F, Salmond J, Talbaut M, Voogt J (2005) The urban boundary-layer field campaign in Marseille (UBL/CLU-ESCOMPTE): set-up and first results. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114: 315–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyamoto K (1997) Renewable biological systems for alternative sustainable energy production. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 128, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 180 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Offerle B, Eliasson I, Grimmond CSB, Holmer B (2007) Surface heating in relation to air temperature, wind and turbulence in an urban street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122: 273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oke TR (1989) The micrometeorology of the urban forest. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B 324: 335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oleson K, Bonan G, Feddema J, Vertenstein M, Grimmond CSB (2008) An urban parameterization for a global climate model: 1. Formulation & evaluation for two cities. J Appl Meteorol Clim 47: 1038–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park S-U (1994) The effect of surface physical condition on the growth of the atmospheric boundary layer. J Korean Meteorol Soc 30(1): 119–134Google Scholar
  32. Porson A, Clark PA, Harman IN, Best MJ, Belcher SE (2010) Implementation of a new urban energy budget scheme in the MetUM. Part I: Description and idealized simulations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136: 1514–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robitu M, Musy M, Inard C, Groleau D (2006) Modeling the influence of vegetation and water pond on urban microclimate. Sol Energy 80: 435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rotach MW, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Batchvarova E, Christen A, Clappier A, Feddersen B, Gryning S-E, Martucci G, Mayer H, Mitev V, Oke TR, Parlow E, Richner H, Roth M, Roulet Y-A, Ruffieux D, Salmond JA, Schatzmann M, Voogt JA (2005) BUBBLE—an urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor Appl Climatol 81: 231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takebayashi H, Moriyama M (2007) Surface heat budget on green roof and high reflection roof for mitigation of urban heat island. Build Environ 42: 2971–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2: 184–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.NOAA Earth System Research LaboratoryBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations