Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 229–242 | Cite as

Tracer Flux Balance at an Urban Canyon Intersection

  • Matteo CarpentieriEmail author
  • Alan G. Robins
Article

Abstract

Despite their importance for pollutant dispersion in urban areas, the special features of dispersion at street intersections are rarely taken into account by operational air quality models. Several previous studies have demonstrated the complex flow patterns that occur at street intersections, even with simple geometry. This study presents results from wind-tunnel experiments on a reduced scale model of a complex but realistic urban intersection, located in central London. Tracer concentration measurements were used to derive three-dimensional maps of the concentration field within the intersection. In combination with a previous study (Carpentieri et al., Boundary-Layer Meteorol 133:277–296, 2009) where the velocity field was measured in the same model, a methodology for the calculation of the mean tracer flux balance at the intersection was developed and applied. The calculation highlighted several limitations of current state-of-the-art canyon dispersion models, arising mainly from the complex geometry of the intersection. Despite its limitations, the proposed methodology could be further developed in order to derive, assess and implement street intersection dispersion models for complex urban areas.

Keywords

Flame ionisation detector Flux balance Street intersection Urban canyon Wind tunnel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold SJ, ApSimon H, Barlow J, Belcher S, Bell M, Boddy JW, Britter R, Cheng H, Clark R, Colvile RN, Dimitroulopoulou S, Dobre A, Greally B, Kaur S, Knights A, Lawton T, Makepeace A, Martin D, Neophytou M, Neville S, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Nickless G, Price C, Robins A, Shallcross D, Simmonds P, Smalley RJ, Tate J, Tomlin AS, Wang H, Walsh P (2004) Introduction to the DAPPLE air pollution project. Sci Total Environ 332: 139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belcher SE (2005) Mixing and transport in urban areas. Phil Trans Roy Soc A 363: 2947–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowicz R, Hertel O, Larsen SE, Sørensen NN, Nielsen M (1997) Modelling traffic pollution in streets. Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy, National Environmental Research Institute, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  4. Britter RE, Hanna SR (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35: 469–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpentieri M, Robins AG, Baldi S (2009) Three-dimensional mapping of air flow at an urban canyon intersection. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 133: 277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenger J (1999) Urban air quality. Atmos Environ 33: 4877–4900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamlyn D, Hilderman T, Britter RE (2007) A simple network approach to modelling dispersion among large groups of obstacles. Atmos Environ 28: 5848–5862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoydysh WG, Dabberdt WF (1994) Concentration fields at urban intersections: fluid modeling studies. Atmos Environ 28: 1849–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kastner-Klein P, Plate EJ, Fedorovich E (1997) Gaseous pollutant dispersion around urban canopy elements: wind tunnel case studies. Int J Environ Pollut 8: 727–737Google Scholar
  10. Ketzel M, Louka P, Sahm P, Guilloteau E, Sini J-F, Moussiopoulos N (2002) Intercomparison of numerical urban dispersion models—Part II: street canyon in Hannover, Germany. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2: 603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Papathanassiou A, Douros I, Moussiopoulos N (2008) A simplified three-dimensional approach to street canyon modelling using SEP-SCAM. Environ Modell Softw 23: 304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robins A, Savory E, Scaperdas A, Grigoriadis D (2002) Spatial variability and source-receptor relations at a street intersection. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2: 381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scaperdas A-S (2000) Modelling flow and pollutant dispersion at urban canyon intersections. PhD thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Scaperdas A, Colvile RN (1999) Assessing the representativeness of monitoring data from an urban intersection site in central London, UK. Atmos Environ 33: 661–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Soulhac L (2000) Modélisation de la dispersion atmosphérique á l’intérieur de la canopée urbaine. PhD thesis, École Centrale de Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  16. Soulhac L, Perkins RP, Salizzoni P (2008) Flow in a street canyon for any external wind direction. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126: 365–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soulhac L, Garbero V, Salizzoni P, Mejean P, Perkins RP (2009) Flow and dispersion in street intersections. Atmos Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.061
  18. Vardoulakis S, Fisher BEA, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca N (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37: 155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wichmann-Fiebig M, Pfeffer H-U, Rau M (1997) A dataset for the validation of flow and dispersion models as an urban intersection. Int J Environ Pollut 8: 747–760Google Scholar
  20. Wood CR, Arnold SJ, Balogun AA, Barlow JF, Belcher S, Britter RE, Cheng H, Dobre A, Lingard JJN, Martin D, Neophytou MK, Petersson FK, Robins AG, Shallcross DE, Smalley RJ, Tate JE, Tomlin AS, White IR (2009) Dispersion experiments in Central London: the 2007 DAPPLE project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90: 955–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamartino RJ, Wiegand G (1986) Development and evaluation of simple models for the flow, turbulence and pollutant concentration fields within an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 20: 2137–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EnFlo, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations