Resolved Versus Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part I: A Parametrization-Oriented Conditional Sampling in Large-Eddy Simulations
- 252 Downloads
A conditional sampling based on the combination of a passive tracer emitted at the surface and thermodynamic variables is proposed to characterise organized structures in large-eddy simulations of cloud-free and cloudy boundary layers. The sampling is evaluated against more traditional sampling of dry thermals or clouds. It enables the characterization of convective updrafts from the surface to the top of the boundary layer (or the top of cumulus clouds), describing in particular the transition from the sub-cloud to the cloud layer, and retrieves plume characteristics, entrainment and detrainment rates, variances and fluxes. This sampling is used to analyze the contribution of boundary-layer thermals to vertical fluxes and variances.
KeywordsCoherent structures Conditional sampling Convective boundary layer Large-eddy simulations Mass-flux parametrization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown AR, Cederwall RT, Chlond A, Duynkerke PG, Golaz M, Khairoutdinov JC, Lewellen DC, Lock AP, Macvean MK, Moeng CH, Neggers RAJ, Siebesma AP, Stevens B (2002) Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 128: 1075–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lafore J-P, Stein J, Ascencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Hereil P, Mascart P, Masson V, Pinty J-P, Redelsperger J-L, Richard E, Vil-Gueraude de Arellano J (1998) The meso-nh atmospheric simulation system. Part i: Adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 16: 90–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rio C, Couvreux F, Hourdin F (2010) Resolved versus parametrized boundary-layer plumes. Part II: A new formulation of mixing rates for mass-flux schemes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (under review)Google Scholar
- Siebesma AP, Teixeira J (2000) An advection-diffusion scheme for the convective boundary layer: description and 1d-results. In: Proceedings of the 14th symposium on boundary layers and turbulence, Aspen, CO, American Meteorological Society, pp 133–136Google Scholar