Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 315–337 | Cite as

Aerodynamic Parameters of Regular Arrays of Rectangular Blocks with Various Geometries

  • Aya HagishimaEmail author
  • Jun Tanimoto
  • Koji Nagayama
  • Sho Meno


The aerodynamic effects of various configurations of an urban array were investigated in a wind-tunnel experiment. Three aerodynamic parameters characterising arrays—the drag coefficient (C d ), roughness length (z o) and displacement height (d)—are used for analysis. C d is based on the direct measurement of the total surface shear using a floating element, and the other two parameters are estimated by logarithmic fitting of the measured wind profile and predetermined total drag force. The configurations of 63 arrays used for measurement were designed to estimate the effects of layout, wind direction and the height variability of the blocks on these parameters for various roughness packing densities. The results are summarised as follows: (1) The estimated C d and z o of the staggered arrays peak against the plan area index (λ p ) and frontal area index (λ f ), in contrast with values for the square arrays, which are less sensitive to λ p and λ f . In addition, the square arrays with a wind direction of 45° have a considerably larger C d , and the wind direction increases z o/H by up to a factor of 2. (2) The effect of the non-uniformity of roughness height on z o is more remarkable when λ f exceeds 20%, and the discrepancy in z o is particularly remarkable and exceeds 200%. (3) The effect of the layout of tall blocks on C d is stronger than that of short blocks. These results indicate that the effects of both wind direction and the non-uniformity of the heights of buildings on urban aerodynamic parameters vary greatly with λ p and λ f ; hence, these effects should be taken into account by considering the roughness packing density.


Displacement height Drag coefficient Roughness length Wind-tunnel experiment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bottema M (1997) Urban roughness modelling in relation to pollutant dispersion. Atmos Environ 31: 3059–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burian SJ, Brown MJ, Linger SP (2002) Morphological analyses using 3D building databases, Los Angeles, California. LA-UR-02-0781, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 66 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Ca VT, Ashie Y, Asaeda T (2002) A k-ε turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer including urban canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 102: 459–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 229–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng H, Hayden P, Robins AG, Castro IP (2007) Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 95: 715–740Google Scholar
  6. Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121: 491–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coceal O, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Spatial variability of flow statistics within regular building arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125: 537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillies JA, Nickling WG, King J (2007) Shear stress partitioning in large patches of roughness in the atmospheric inertial sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122: 367–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38: 1262–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J (2005) Investigations of urban surface conditions for urban canopy model. Build Environ 40: 1638–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson PS (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile. J Fluid Mech 111: 15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang D, Jiang W, Liu H, Sun J (2008) Systematic influence of different building spacing, height and layout on mean wind and turbulent characteristics within and over urban building arrays. Wind Struct 11: 275–289Google Scholar
  13. Jimenez J (2004) Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36: 173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanda M (2006) Large-eddy simulations on the effects of surface geometry of building arrays on turbulent organized structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118: 151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large eddy simulation of turbulent organized structure within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112: 343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kondo H, Liu FH (1998) A study on the urban thermal environment obtained through one-dimensional urban canopy model. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 33: 179–192 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Kondo H, Genchi Y, Kikegawa Y, Ohashi Y, Yoshikado H, Komiyama H (2005) Development of a multilayer urban canopy model for the analysis of energy consumption in a big city: Structure of the urban canopy model and its basic performance. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116: 395–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2004) Fluid mechanics, vol 335–336, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, London, p 759Google Scholar
  19. Lien FS, Yee E, Wilson JD (2005) Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array, part ii: a mathematical foundation for a distributed drag force approach. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114: 243–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macdonald RW, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (1998) An improved method for estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32: 1857–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martilli A, Santiago JL (2007) CFD simulation of airflow over a regular array of cubes. Part II: analysis of spatial average properties. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122: 635–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maruyama T (1993) Optimization of roughness parameters for staggered arrayed cubic blocks using experimental data. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46&47: 165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masson V (2006) Urban surface modeling and the meso-scale impact of cities. Theor Appl Climatol 84: 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mochizuki S, Kameda T, Osaka H (2006) Self-preservation of a turbulent boundary layer over d-type roughness. J Fluid Sci Tech 1: 24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oke TR (1988) Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Eng Build 11: 103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perry AE, Schofield WH, Joubert PN (1969) Rough wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 37: 383–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raupach MR (1981) Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 108: 363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reynolds RT, Castro IP (2008) Measurements in an urban-type boundary layer. Exp Fluids 45: 141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reynolds RT, Hayden P, Castro IP, Robins AG (2007) Spanwise variations in nominally two dimensional rough-wall boundary layers. Exp Fluids 42: 311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santiago JL, Coceal O, Martilli A, Belcher SE (2008) Variation of the sectional drag coefficient of a group of buildings with packing density. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 128: 445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snyder WH, Castro IP (2002) The critical Reynolds number for rough-wall boundary layers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 90: 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Uno I, Ueda H, Wakamatsu S (1989) Numerical modelling of the nocturnal urban boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 49: 77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xie Z-T, Coceal O, Castro IP (2008) Large-eddy simulation of flows over random urban-like obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aya Hagishima
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jun Tanimoto
    • 1
  • Koji Nagayama
    • 1
  • Sho Meno
    • 1
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations