Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 128, Issue 3, pp 459–472

A One-Dimensional Finite-Element Boundary-Layer Model with a Vertical Adaptive Grid

Original Paper


A one-dimensional atmospheric boundary-layer model is developed using the finite element method and a 1.5-order e-l turbulence closure scheme. A vertical adaptive strategy is implemented, based upon an heuristic error estimator that depends upon properties of the layer, such as the stratification. The model is used to simulate a moderately stratified stable boundary layer as described in the GABLS (GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Study, where GEWEX is the Global Water and Energy Cycle Experiment) First Intercomparison Project, and then a more complicated diurnal cycle, as used in the GABLS Second Intercomparison Project. In the stable boundary-layer experiment, it is shown that including the adaptive strategy can improve the performance of the model such that the error in the model is significantly less (greater than an order of magnitude with an effective resolution of 8 m) than that of the model without adaptivity. The model’s turbulence closure scheme and the adaptivity strategy also successfully simulate the different stability regimes present in the diurnal cycle simulation, and represented all of the expected features.


Diurnal cycle e-l turbulence closure Finite element method Stable atmospheric boundary layer Vertical adaptivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andre JC, De Moor G, Therry G, Du Vachat R (1978) Modelling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 35: 1861–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beare RJ, MacVean M, Holtslag A, Cuxart J, Esav I, Golaz J-C, Jimenez M, Khairoutdinov M, Kosovic B, Lewellen D, Lund T, Lundquist J, McCabe A, Moene A, Noh Y, Raasch S, Sullivan P (2005) An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(2): 247–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackadar AK (1962) The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J Geophys Res 67: 3095–3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burchard H, Beckers J-M (2004) Non-uniform adaptive vertical grids in one-dimensional numerical ocean models. Ocean Model 6: 51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuxart J, Holtslag A, Beare R, Bazile E, Beljaars A, Cheng A, Conangla L, Ek M, Freedman F, Hamdi R, Kerstein A, Kitagawa H, Lenderink G, Lewellen D, Mailhot J, Mauritsen T, Perov V, Schayes G, Steeneveld G-J, Svensson G, Taylor P, Weng W, Wunsch S, Xu K-M (2005) Single-column model intercomparison for a stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(2): 273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dietachmayer G, Droegemeier KK (1992) Application of continuous dynamic grid adaption techniques to meteorological modelling: Part I: basic formulation and accuracy. Mon Wea Rev 120: 1675–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiedler BH (2002) Grid adaption and its effect on entrainment in an e-l model of the atmospheric boundary layer. Mon Wea Rev 130: 733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiedler BH, Trapp RJ (1993) A fast dynamic grid adaption scheme for meteorological flows. Mon Wea Rev 121: 2879–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galperin B, Kantha LH, Hassid S, Rosati S (1988) A quasi-equilibrium turbulent energy model for geophysical flows. J Atmos Sci 45: 55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanert E, Deleersnijder E, Legat V (2006) An adaptive finite element water column model using the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 turbulence closure scheme. Ocean Model 12: 205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanert E, Deleersnijder E, Blaise S, Remacle J-F (2007) Capturing the bottom boundary layer in finite element ocean models. Ocean Model 17: 153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtslag B (2005) Preface: GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer Study (GABLS) on stable boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(2): 243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jablonowski C (2004) Adaptive grids in weather and climate modelling. Ph.D. thesis, The University Of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosovic B, Curry JA (2000) A large-eddy simulation of a quasi-steady, stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 57: 1052–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu CH, Leung DYC (1998) Evaluation of an atmospheric boundary layer model used for air pollution studies. J Appl Meteorol 37: 1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A heirarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31: 1791–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piggott MD, Pain CC, Gorman GJ, Power PW, Goddard AJH (2004) h, r and hr adaptivity with applications in numerical ocean modelling. Ocean Model 10: 95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poulos SG, Blumen W, Fritts DC, Lundquist JK, Sun J, Burns SP, Nappo C, Banta R, Newsom R, Cuxart J, Terradellas E, Balsley B, Jensen M (2002) CASES-99: a comprehensive investigation of the stable nocturnal boundary layer. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 83: 555–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steeneveld GJ, van de Wiel BJH, Holtslag AAM (2006) Modelling the evolution of the atmospheric boundary coupled to the land surface for three contrasting nights in CASES99. J Atmos Sci 63: 920–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MeteorologyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations