Relating Urban Surface-layer Structure to Upwind Terrain for the Salford Experiment (Salfex)
- 138 Downloads
Profiles of wind and turbulence over an urban area evolve with fetch in response to surface characteristics. Sodar measurements, taken on 22 April 2002 during the Salford Experiment in the UK (Salfex), are here related to upstream terrain. A logarithmic layer up to z = 65m was observed in all half-hour averaged profiles. Above this height the profile showed a different vertical gradient, suggesting a change in surface cover upstream. The drag coefficient varied by a factor of two over only a 20° direction change. Turbulence intensity (σ x ) for each wind component (x) decreased with height, but the ratio suggested an underestimate of σ u compared to previous results. Mean urban and suburban cover fraction within the source area for each height decreased sharply between z = 20 and 50m, increasing slightly above. The near-convergence of cover fractions thus occured for source areas of minimum length ≈ 2,200 m. In comparison, the mean length scale of heterogeneity L P was calculated from surface cover data to be 1,284 m, and the corresponding mean blending height h b was 175 m. Finally, the mean streamline angle, α, was negative and the magnitude decreased with height. An exponential fit to α for z ≤ 65m gave an e-folding height scale of 159 m. A simple relationship between this height scale and L P was assumed, giving L P ≈ 1,080 m, which is in reasonable agreement with the estimate from surface cover type. The results suggest that more emphasis is required on modelling and measuring surface-layer flow over heterogeneous urban canopies.
KeywordsSodar Source area Surface heterogeneity Urban boundary layer Urban canopy Wind profile
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Coulter RL, Pekour MS, Martin TJ (2004) Comparative study of sodar-derived dissipation rates in urban and suburban environments. In: 12th international symposium on acoustic remote sensing, Cambridge, Mass, USAGoogle Scholar
- Cullen MJP, Davies T, Mawson MH, James JA, Coulter SC, Malcolm A (1997) An overview of numerical methods for the next generation UK NWP and climate model. In: Lin CA, Laprise R, Ritchie H (eds) Numerical methods in atmospheric and ocean modelling: the Andre J. Robert memorial volume, 1st edn. Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society/NRC Research Press, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Lumley JL, Panofsky HA (1964) The structure of atmospheric turbulence. Wiley-Interscience, New York, p 239Google Scholar
- Mason PJ (1988) The formation of areally-averaged roughness lengths. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114: 399–420Google Scholar
- Miyake M (1965) Transformation of the atmospheric boundary layer over inhomogeneous surfaces. Science report 5R-6, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Pearson GN, Collier CG (1999) A pulsed coherent CO2 lidar for boundary-layer meteorology. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 125(559): 2703–2721Google Scholar
- Rotach MW, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Batchvarova E, Christen A, Clappier A, Feddersen B, Gryning S-E, Martucci G, Mayer H, Mitev V, Oke TR, Parlow E, Richner H, Roth M, Roulet Y-A, Ruffieux D, Salmond JA, Schatzmann M, Voogt JA (2005) BUBBLE – an urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor Appl Climatol 81: 231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- VDI Guidelines 3783, part 12 (2000) Environmental meteorology: physical modelling of the flow and dispersion processes in the atmospheric boundary layer, Application of wind tunnels, VDI Handbuch Reinhaltung Luft, Band 1b, December 2000, 35 ppGoogle Scholar