On the relationship between the eddy covariance, the turbulent flux, and surface exchange for a trace gas such as CO2
- First Online:
In the context of CO2 surface exchange estimation, an analysis combining the basic principles of diffusion and scalar conservation shows that the mixing ratio is the appropriate variable both for defining the (eddy covariance) turbulent flux and also for expressing the relationship between the turbulent flux and surface exchange in boundary-layer budget equations. Other scalar intensity variables sometimes chosen, both the CO2 density and molar fraction, are susceptible to the influence of surface exchange of heat and water vapour. The application of a hypsometric analysis to the boundary-layer “control volume” below the tower measurement height reveals flaws in previously applied approaches: (a) incompressibility cannot be assumed to simplify mass conservation (the budget in terms of CO2 density); (b) compressibility alone makes the analysis of mass conservation vulnerable to uncertainties associated with resultant non-zero vertical velocities too small to measure or model over real terrain; and (c) the WPL (Webb et al. (1980) Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 106:85–100) “zero dry air flux” assumption is invalidated except at the surface boundary. Nevertheless, the definition and removal of the WPL terms do not hinge upon this last assumption, and so the turbulent CO2 flux can be accurately determined by eddy covariance using gas analysers of either open- or closed-path design. An appendix discusses the necessary assumptions and appropriate interpretations for deriving the WPL terms.
KeywordsConservative scalars Eddy covariance Mixing ratio Net ecosystem exchange Turbulent flux
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik Ü, Moncrieff JB, Foken T, Kowalski AS, Martin PH, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Clement R, Elbers JA, Granier A, Grünwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res 30:113–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running D, Anthoni PM, Bernhofer C, Davis KJ, Evans R, Fuentes JD, Goldstein AH, Katul GG, Law BE, Lee Z, Malhi Y, Meyers TP, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw UKT, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma SB, Vesala T, Wilson KB, Wofsy SC (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 82(11):2415–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 615 ppGoogle Scholar
- Holton JR (1992) An introduction to dynamic meteorology. Academic Press, San Diego, 511 ppGoogle Scholar
- Khvorostyanov VI, Curry JA (1999) Toward the theory of stochastic condensation in clouds. Part I: A general kinetic equation. J Atmos Sci 56:3985–3996Google Scholar
- Leuning R (2004) Measurements of trace gas fluxes in the atmosphere using eddy covariance: WPL corrections revisted. In: Lee X, Massman WJ, Law BE (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology, A guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 119–132Google Scholar
- Leuning R (2007) The correct form of the Webb, Pearman and Leuning equation for eddy fluxes of trace gases in steady and non-steady state, horizontally homogeneous flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (in press)Google Scholar