Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp 55–75 | Cite as

The Energy Balance Experiment EBEX-2000. Part III: Behaviour and quality of the radiation measurements

  • W. Kohsiek
  • C. Liebethal
  • T. Foken
  • R. Vogt
  • S. P. Oncley
  • Ch. Bernhofer
  • H. A. R. Debruin
Original Paper


An important part of the Energy Balance Experiment (EBEX-2000) was the measurement of the net radiation and its components. Since the terrain, an irrigated cotton field, could not be considered homogeneous, radiation measurements were made at nine sites using a variety of radiation instruments, including pyranometers, pyrgeometers and net radiometers. At several of these sites multiple instruments were employed, which enabled us to compare instruments and assess accuracies. At all sites the outgoing longwave and shortwave radiation and the net radiation were measured, while the incoming radiation was supposed to be uniformly distributed over the field and was therefore measured at three sites only. Net radiation was calculated for all sites from the sum of its four components, and compared with the direct measurement of net radiometers. The main conclusions were: (a) the outgoing shortwave radiation showed differences of up to 30 W m−2 over the field; the differences were not clearly related to the irrigation events; (b) the outgoing longwave radiation showed differences of up to 50 W m−2; the differences increased during the periods of irrigation; (c) the net radiation showed differences of several tens of W m−2 across the field, rising to 50 W m−2 or more during the periods of irrigation; (d) the net radiation is preferably to be inferred from its four components, rather than measured directly, and (e) attention should be paid to the characteristics of pyranometers that measure the outgoing radiation, and thus are mounted upside down, while they are commonly calibrated in the upward position. The error in the net radiation at EBEX-2000 is estimated at max (25 W m−2, 5%) per site during the day and 10 W m−2 at night.


Albedo EBEX-2000 Net radiometer Pyranometer Pyrgeometer Radiation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brock FV, Richardson SJ (2001) Meteorological measurement systems. Oxford University Press, New York, 290 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Brotzge JA, Duchon CE (2000) A field comparison among a domeless net radiometer, two four-component net radiometers, and a domed net radiometer. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:1569–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chess RD, Qian T, Sun M (2000) Consistency tests applied to the measurement of total, direct and diffuse shortwave radiation at the surface. J Geophys Res 105(D20):24881–24887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dehne K, Bergholter U, Kasten F (1993) IEA comparison of longwave radiometers. International Energy Agency Rep. IEA-SHCP-9F-3, 72 pp. [Available from: Morse Associates, Inc., 236 Massachusetts Ave. NE, Suite 605, Washington DC 20002, USA]Google Scholar
  5. De Luisi J, Dehne K, Vogt R (1992) First Results of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) broadband infrared radiometer intercomparison at FIRE II. In International radiation symposion (IRS ’92), Tallinn, Estonia, 3–8 August 1992, pp 559–564Google Scholar
  6. Eppley (1995) Instruction sheet for the Eppley Precision Infrared Radiometer (Model PIR), Available from The Eppley Laboratory, Inc., P.O. Box 419, Newport, RI 02840, USA, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Fairall CW, Persson POG, Bradley EF, Payne RE, Anderson SP (1998) A new look at calibration and use of the Eppley Precision Infrared Radiometers. Part 1: Theory and application. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:1229–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritschen LJ, Fritschen CL (1991) Design and evaluation of net radiometers. In seventh symposium on meteorological observations and instrumentation. New Orleans, USA, pp 113–117Google Scholar
  9. Gilgen H, Whitlock CH, Koch F, Müller G, Ohmura A, Steiger D, Wheeler R (1995) Technical plan for BSRN data management version 2.1, WMO/TD-No. 443Google Scholar
  10. Halldin S, Lindroth A (1992) Errors in net radiometry: comparison and evaluation of six radiometer designs. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 9:762–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halldin S (2004) Radiation measurements in integrated terrestrial experiments. In: P. Kabat et al. (eds) Vegetation, water, humans and the climate. Springer, pp 167–171Google Scholar
  12. Kohsiek W, van Lammeren ACAP (1997) Pyrgeometer formula. Appl Opt 36:5984–5986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ohmura A, Dutton EG, Forgan B, Fröhlich C, Gilgen H, Hegner H, Heimo A, König-Langlo G, McArthur B, Müller G, Philipona R, Pinker R, Whitlock CH, Dehne K, Wild M (1998) Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN/WCRP): new precision radiometry for climate research. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 79:2115–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oncley SP, Foken Th, Vogt R, Bernhofer Ch, Kohsiek W, Liu H, Pitacco A, Grantz D, Ribeiro L, Weidinger T (2002) The Energy Balance Experiment EBEX-2000. Proceedings 15th symposium on boundary layers and turbulence 15–19 July (2002), Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  15. Oncley SP, Foken T, Vogt R, Kohsiek W, Debruin HAR, Bernhofer Ch, Christen A, Gorsel E, Grantz D, Lehner I, Liebethal C, Liu H, Mauder M, Pitacco A, Ribeiro L, Weidinger T (2006) The Energy Balance Experiment EBEX-2000. Part I: Overview and energy balance. Boundary-Layer Meteorol this issueGoogle Scholar
  16. Pérez M, Alados-Arboledas L (1999) Effects of natural ventilation and solar radiation on the performance of pyrgeometers. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 16:174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Philipona R, Fröhlich C, Betz Ch (1995) Characterization of pyrgeometers and the accuracy of atmospheric long-wave radiation measurements. Appl Optics 34:1598–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Philipona R, Fröhlich C, Dehne K, DeLuisi J, Augustine J, Dutton E, Nelson D, Forgan B, Novotny P, Hickey J, Love SP, Bender S, McArthur B, Ohmura A, Seymour JH, Foot JS, Shiobara M., Valero FPJ, Strawa AW (1998) The Baseline Surface Radiation Network pyrgeometer Round-Robin calibration experiment. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reda I, Hickey J, Long C, Myers D, Stoffel T, Wilcox S, Michalsky JJ, Dutton EG, Nelson D (2005) Using a blackbody to calculate net longwave responsivity of shortwave solar pyranometers to correct for their thermal offset error during outdoor calibration using the component sum method. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 22:1531–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vogt R (2000) Aspekte der Strahlungsbilanzmessung. Berichte des Meteorologischen Institutes der Universität Freiburg 5:173–183Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Kohsiek
    • 1
  • C. Liebethal
    • 2
  • T. Foken
    • 2
  • R. Vogt
    • 3
  • S. P. Oncley
    • 4
  • Ch. Bernhofer
    • 5
  • H. A. R. Debruin
    • 6
  1. 1.Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)De BiltThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  3. 3.University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  5. 5.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  6. 6.Meteorology and Air Quality GroupWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations