Spatial representativeness of single tower measurements and the imbalance problem with eddy-covariance fluxes: results of a large-eddy simulation study
- 363 Downloads
A large-eddy simulation (LES) study is presented that investigates the spatial variability of temporal eddy covariance fluxes and the systematic underestimation of representative fluxes linked to them. It extends a prior numerical study by performing high resolution simulations that allow for virtual measurements down to 20 m in a convective boundary layer, so that conditions for small tower measurement sites can be analysed. It accounts for different convective regimes as the wind speed and the near-surface heat flux are varied. Moreover, it is the first LES imbalance study that extends to the stable boundary layer. It reveals shortcomings of single site measurements and the necessity of using horizontally-distributed observation networks. The imbalances in the convective case are attributed to a locally non-vanishing mean vertical advection due to turbulent organised structures (TOS). The strength of the TOS and thus the imbalance magnitude depends on height, the horizontal mean wind and the convection type. Contrary to the results of a prior study, TOS cannot generally be responsible for large energy imbalances: at low observation heights (corresponding to small towers and near-surface energy balance stations) the TOS related imbalances are generally about one order of magnitude smaller than those in field experiments. However, TOS may cause large imbalances at large towers not only in the case of cellular convection and low wind speeds, as found in the previous study, but also in the case of roll convection at large wind speeds.
In the stably stratified boundary layer for all observation heights neither TOS nor significant imbalances are observed.
Attempting to reduce imbalances in convective situations by applying the conventional linear detrending method increases the systematic flux underestimation. Thus, a new filter method is proposed.
KeywordsConvective boundary layer Eddy covariance Imbalance problem Large-eddy simulation Stable boundary layer Turbulent fluxes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beare RJ, Cortes MAJ, Cuxart J, Esau I, Golaz C, Holtslag AAM, Khairoutdinov M, Kosovic B, Lewellen D, Lund T, Lundquist J, McCabe A, Macvean MK, Moene A, Noh Y, Poulos G, Raasch S, Sullivan PP (2006) An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118:247–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernhardt K, Piazena H (1988) Zum Einfluss der turbulenzbedingten Dichteschwankungen auf die Bestimmung turbulenter Austauschstrme in der Bodenschicht. Z Meteorol 38:234–245Google Scholar
- Beyrich F, Richter SH, Weisensee U, Kohsiek W, Lohse H, de Bruin HAR, Foken T, Göckede M, Berger F, Vogt R, Batchvarova E (2002) Experimental determination of turbulent fluxes over the heterogeneous LITFASS area: selected results from the LITFASS-98 experiment. Theor Appl Climatol 73:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foken T (2003) Angewandte meteorologie. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 290 ppGoogle Scholar
- Katul G, Hsieh C, Bowling D, Clark K, Shurpali N, Turnipseed A, Albertson J, Tu K, Hollinger D, Evans B, Offerle B, Anderson D, Ellsworth D, Vogel C, Oren R (1999) Spatial variability of turbulent fluxes in the roughness sublayer of an even-aged pine forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 93:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oncley SP, Foken T, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Kohsiek W, Liu H, Pitacco A, Grantz D, Ribeiro L, Weidinger T (2002) The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. In: Proceedings of the 15th symposium on boundary layer and turbulence, Wageningen, The Netherlands, American Meteorological Society, pp 1–4Google Scholar
- Raasch S (cited 2006) PALM group. [Available online at http://www.muk.uni-hannover. de/~/PALM_group/]Google Scholar
- Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 ppGoogle Scholar
- Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar