Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 122, Issue 2, pp 293–320 | Cite as

Experimental study of the transfer velocity for urban surfaces with a water evaporation method

  • Ken-ichi Narita
Original Paper

Abstract

A major problem in urban climate modelling is determining how the heat fluxes from various canyon surfaces are affected by canyon flow. To address this problem, we developed a water evaporation method involving filter paper to study the distribution of the convective transfer velocity in urban street canyons. In this method, filter paper is pasted onto a building model and the evaporation rate from the paper is measured with an electric balance. The method was tested on 2D (two-dimensional) street canyon models and 3D model arrangements. Moreover, in this technique, it is easy to restrict the flux within an arbitrary surface in question. That is, the evaporation distribution on a surface can be studied by using several small pieces of filter paper. In the 2D case, the wall transfer velocity was strongly dependent on the canyon aspect ratio for perpendicular wind directions and it varied widely with height within both windward and leeward wall surfaces. For 3D cubic arrays, the relation to canyon aspect ratio was largely different from that of the 2D canyon. And, as a case study, the variation of wind direction was investigated for a city-like setting. The area-averaged transfer velocity was insensitive to wind direction but its local deviation was significant. Finally, we measured the transfer velocity for a clustered block array surrounded by relatively wide streets. The effect of spatial heterogeneity on the transfer velocity was significant. Moreover, for a fixed total building volume, the transfer velocity was considerably larger when the building height varied than when it was uniform. Therefore, the water evaporation method with filter paper is expected to be useful for studying the transfer velocity and ventilation rates in urban areas with various canyon shapes.

Keywords

Sensible heat flux Spatial heterogeneity Turbulent transfer Urban canopy layer Urban climate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baik J-J, Kim J-J (1999) A numerical study of flow and pollutant dispersion characteristics in urban street canyons. J Appl Meteorol 38:1249–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow JF, Belcher SE (2002) A wind tunnel model for quantifying fluxes in the urban boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow JF, Harman IN, Belcher SE (2004) Scalar fluxes from urban street canyon. Part I: laboratory simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:369–385Google Scholar
  4. Clear RD, Cartland L, Winkelmann FC (2003) An empirical correlation for the outside convective air-film coefficient for horizontal roofs. Energy Buildings 35:797–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole RJ, Sturrock NS (1977) The convective heat exchange at the external surface of buildings. Building Environ 12:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldstein RJ, Cho HH (1995) A review of mass transfer measurements using naphthalene sublimation. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 10:416–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman IN, Barlow JF, Belcher SE (2004) Scalar fluxes from urban street canyon. Part II: Model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:387–410Google Scholar
  8. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J (2003) Field measurements for estimating the convective heat transfer coefficient at building surface. Building Environ 38:873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Narita K (2005) Review of the experimental researches on the convective heat transfer coefficient of the urban surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 117:551–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Incropera F, DeWitte D (1996) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, 981 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Ito N, Kimura K, Oka J (1972) A field experiment study on the convective heat transfer coefficient on exterior surface of a building. ASHRAE Trans 78:184–191Google Scholar
  12. Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large Eddy simulation of turbulent organized structure within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanda M, Kawai T, Kanega M, Moriwaki R, Narita K, Hagishima A (2005) Simple energy balance model for regular building arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116:423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kusaka H, Kondo H, Kikegawa Y, Kimura F (2001) A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: comparison with multi-layer and slab models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101:329–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loveday DL, Taki AH (1996) Convective heat transfer coefficients at a plane surface on a full-scale building façade. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 39:1729–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Masson V (2000) A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:357–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masson V, Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (2002) Evaluation of the town energy balance (TEB) scheme with direct measurements from dry districts in two cities. J Appl Meteorol 41:1011–1026Google Scholar
  19. Narita K (2004) Effects of building-height heterogeneity on area-averaged transfer velocity in the street surface – wind tunnel experiments using salinity change technique. Proc of 5th Symposium on the Urban Environment. AMS, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  20. Oke TR (1998) Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy Buildings 11:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringNippon Institute of TechnologyMiyashiroJapan

Personalised recommendations