Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 122, Issue 1, pp 123–147 | Cite as

Organised Motion in a Tall Spruce Canopy: Temporal Scales, Structure Spacing and Terrain Effects

  • Christoph Thomas
  • Thomas Foken
Original Paper


This study investigates the organised motion near the canopy-atmosphere interface of a moderately dense spruce forest in heterogeneous, complex terrain. Wind direction is used to assess differences in topography and surface properties. Observations were obtained at several heights above and within the canopy using sonic anemometers and fast-response gas analysers over the course of several weeks. Analysed variables include the three-dimensional wind vector, the sonic temperature, and the concentration of carbon dioxide. Wavelet analysis was used to extract the organised motion from time series and to derive its temporal scales. Spectral Fourier analysis was deployed to compute power spectra and phase spectra. Profiles of temporal scales of ramp-like coherent structures in the vertical and longitudinal wind components showed a reversed variation with height and were of similar size within the canopy. Temporal scales of scalar fields were comparable to those of the longitudinal wind component suggesting that the lateral scalar transport dominates. The existence of a – 1 power law in the longitudinal power spectra was confirmed for a few cases only, with a majority showing a clear 5/3 decay. The variation of effective scales of organised motion in the longitudinal velocity and temperature were found to vary with atmospheric stability, suggesting that both Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities and attached eddies dominate the flow with increasing convectional forcing. The canopy mixing-layer analogy was observed to be applicable for ramp-like coherent structures in the vertical wind component for selected wind directions only. Departures from the prediction of m = Λ w L s −1 = 8–10 (where Λ w is the streamwise spacing of coherent structures in the vertical wind w and L s is a canopy shear length scale) were caused by smaller shear length scales associated with large-scale changes in the terrain as well as the vertical structure of the canopy. The occurrence of linear gravity waves was related to a rise in local topography and can therefore be referred to as mountain-type gravity waves. Temporal scales of wave motion and ramp-like coherent structures were observed to be comparable.


Coherent structures Gravity Waves Mixing-layer Analogy Vegetation Wavelet transform 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amiro B (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within three boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 51:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldocchi D, Meyers T (1988a) A spectral and lag-correlation analysis of turbulence in a deciduous forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45:31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi D, Meyers T (1988b) Turbulence structure in a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43:345–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergström H, Högström U (1989) Turbulent exchange above a pine forest. II. Organized structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 49:231–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunet Y, Collineau S (1994). Wavelet analysis of diurnal and nocturnal turbulence above a maize canopy. In: Foufoula-Georgiou E, Kumar P (eds). Wavelets in geophysics, Vol.4 of Wavelet analysis and its applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 129–150Google Scholar
  6. Brunet Y, Irvine M (2000) The control of coherent eddies in vegetation canopies: streamwise structure spacing, canopy shear scale and atmospheric stability. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:139–163Google Scholar
  7. Caughey S (1977) Boundary-layer turbulence spectra in stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 11:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cava D, Giostra U, Siqueira M, Katul G (2004) Organised motion and radiative perturbations in the nocturnal canopy sublayer above an even-aged pine forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112: 129–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J, Hu F (2003) Coherent structures detected in atmospheric boundary-layer turbulence using wavelet transforms at Huaihe River Basin, China. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collineau S, Brunet Y (1993a) Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a forest canopy. Part I: Wavelet analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65:357–379Google Scholar
  11. Collineau S, Brunet Y (1993b) Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a forest canopy. Part II: Time-scales and conditional averages. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 66:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeBaas AF, Driedonks AGM (1985) Internal gravity waves in a stably stratified boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 31:303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einaudi F, Finnigan JJ (1981) The interaction between an internal gravity wave and the planetary boundary layer. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 107:793–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finnigan JJ (1979) Turbulence in waving wheat. II. Structure of momentum transfer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 16:213–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foken T, Göckede M, Mauder M, Mahrt L, Amiro B, Munger J (2004). Post-field data quality control. In: Lee X, Massman WJ, Law B (eds). Handbook of micrometeorology: A guide for surface flux measurements. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 181–208Google Scholar
  17. Foken T, Leclerc MY (2004) Methods and limitations in validation of footprint models. Agric For Meteorol 127:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao W, Shaw RH, Paw UKT (1989) Observation of organized structures in turbulent flow within and above a forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47:349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gedzelman SD (1983) Short-period atmospheric gravity waves: a study of their statistical properties and source mechanisms. Mon Wea Rev 111:1293–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerstberger P, Foken T, Kalbitz K (2004). The Lehstenbach and Steinkreuz catchments in NE Bavaria, Germany. In: Matzner E (eds). Biogeochemistry of forested catchments in a changing environment. Ecological studies. No. 172, Vol. 172. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 15–41Google Scholar
  21. Gill AE (1982) Atmosphere-ocean dynamics, Vol.30 of International geophysics series. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 662Google Scholar
  22. Grossmann A, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J (1989). Reading and understanding continuous wavelet transforms. In: Combes J, Grossmann A, Tchamitchian P (eds). Wavelets: time-frequency methods and phase space. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 2–20Google Scholar
  23. Grossmann A, Morlet J (1984) Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. J Math Anal 15:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handorf D, Foken T (1997) Analysis of turbulent structure over an Antarctic ice shelf by means of wavelet transformation. In: 12th Symposium on boundary layers and turbulence. Vancouver BC, Canada, pp 245–246, Amer Meteorol SocGoogle Scholar
  25. James J (2002) A student’s guide to Fourier transforms: with applications in physics and engineering, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 142 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins G, Watts D (1968) In: Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden-Day, Oackland, pp 344–348Google Scholar
  27. Kantha LH, Clayson CA (2000) Small scale processes in geophysical fluid flows, Vol.67 of International geophysics series. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 888 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Katul G, Chu C-R (1998) A theoretical and experimental investigation of energy-containing scales in the dynamic sublayer of boundary-layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 86:279–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katul G, Geron C, Hsieh CI, Vidakovic B, Guenther A (1998) Active turbulence and scalar transport near the forest-atmosphere interface. J Appl Meteorol 37:1533–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J, Grossmann A (1987) Analysis of sound patterns through wavelet transforms. Int J Pattern Recogn 1:273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar P, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1994). Wavelet analysis in geophysics: an introduction. In: Foufoula-Georgiou E, Kumar P (eds). Wavelets in geophysics, Vol.4 of Wavelet analysis and its applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 1–43Google Scholar
  32. Lu C, Fitzjarrald D (1994) Seasonal and diurnal variations of coherent structures over a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 69:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lykossov V, Wamser C (1995) Turbulence intermittency in the atmospheric surface layer over snow-covered sites. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 72:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahrt L, Howell J (1994) The influence of coherent structures and microfronts on scaling laws using global and local transforms. J Fluid Mech 260:247–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mauder M (2006) Quality assurance for eddy covariance measurements of turbulent fluxes and its influence on the energy balance closure problem. Ph.d. thesis, University of Bayreuth. 167 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Nappo CJ (2002) An introduction to atmospheric gravity waves, Vol.85 of International geophysics series. Academic Press, San Diego, 276 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Novak M, Warland J, Orchansky A, Kettler R, Green S (2000) Wind tunnel and field measurements of turbulent flow in forests. Part I: uniformly thinned stands. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 95:457–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paw UKT, Brunet Y, Collineau S, Shaw RH, Maitani T, Qiu J, Hipps L (1992) Evidence of turbulent coherent structures in and above agricultural plant canopies. Agric For Meteorol 61:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paw UKT, Shaw RH, Maitani T (1990) Gravity waves, coherent structures and plant canopies. In: Reprints of the 9th symposium on turbulence and difussion. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 244–246Google Scholar
  40. Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:565–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1989) Coherent eddies in vegetation canopies. In: 4th Australasian conference on heat and mass transfer. christchurch, New Zealand, pp 75–90Google Scholar
  42. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw RH, Brunet Y, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1995) A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: two-point velocity statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76:349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smedman A (1988) Observation of a multi-level turbulence structure in a very stable atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 44:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, , 666 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Tennekes H, Lumley J (1972). A first course in turbulence. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass, 300 ppGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas C, Foken T (2005) Detection of long-term coherent exchange over spruce forest using wavelet analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 80:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas C, Mayer J-C, Meixner F, Foken T (2006) Analysis of low-frequency turbulence above tall vegetation using a Doppler sodar. Boundary-Layer Meteorol pp DOI 10.1007/s10546–005–9038–0Google Scholar
  49. Turner BJ, Leclerc MY (1994) Conditional sampling of coherent structures in atmospheric turbulence using the wavelet transform. J Atmos Ocean Technol 11:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vickers D, Mahrt L (1997) Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 14:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wichura B, Ruppert J, Delany AC, Buchmann N, Foken T (2004). Structure of carbon dioxide exchange processes above a spruce forest. In: Matzner E (eds). Biogeochemistry of forested catchments in a changing environment. Ecological studies, No. 172, Vol. 172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 161–176Google Scholar
  52. Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrometeorologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations