Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 397–407 | Cite as

An Improved Mellor–Yamada Level-3 Model: Its Numerical Stability and Application to a Regional Prediction of Advection Fog

Article

Abstract

This note describes a numerically stable version of the improved Mellor–Yamada (M–Y) Level-3 model proposed by Nakanishi and Niino [Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: 2004, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 112, 1–31] and demonstrates its application to a regional prediction of advection fog. In order to ensure the realizability for the improved M–Y Level-3 model and its numerical stability, restrictions are imposed on computing stability functions, on L/q, the temperature and water-content variances, and their covariance, where L is the master length scale and q2/2 the turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass. The model with these restrictions predicts vertical profiles of mean quantities such as temperature that are in good agreement with those obtained from large-eddy simulation of a radiation fog. In a regional prediction, it also reasonably reproduces the satellite-observed horizontal distribution of an advection fog.

Keywords

Advection fog Level-3 model Realizability Regional prediction Turbulence closure model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Galperin B., Kantha L.H., Hassid S., and Rosati A. (1988). ‘A Quasi-Equilibrium Turbulent Energy Model for Geophysical Flows’. J. Atmos. Sci 45:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gerrity J.P., Black T.L., and Treadon R.E. (1994). ‘The Numerical Solution of the Mellor–Yamada Level 2.5 Turbulent Kinetic Energy Equation in the Eta Model’. Mon. Wea. Rev. 122:1640–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Helfand H.M. and Labraga J.C. (1988). ‘Design of a Nonsingular Level 2.5 Second-Order Closure Model for the Prediction of Atmospheric Turbulence’. J. Atmos. Sci 45:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Janjić, Z. I.: 2001, Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor–Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso Model, Office Note No. 437, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Japan Meteorological Agency.: 2002, Outline of the Operational Numerical Weather Prediction at the Japan Meteorological Agency, Appendix to the WMO Numerical Weather Prediction Progress Report, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, 158 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Kantha L.H. and Clayson C.A. (1994). ‘An Improved Mixed Layer Model for Geophysical Applications’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(C12):25235–25266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Katayama A. (1972). A Simplified Scheme for Computing Radiative Transfer in the Troposphere, Numerical Simulation of Weather and Climate. Technical Report No. 6, University of California, Los Angeles, 77 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Klemp J.B. and Durran D.R. (1983). ‘An Upper Boundary Condition Permitting Internal Gravity Wave Radiation in Numerical Mesoscale Models’. Mon. Wea. Rev. 111:430–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mellor G.L. and Yamada T. (1982). ‘Development of a Turbulence Closure Model for Geophysical Fluid Problems’, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20:851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Musson-Genon L. (1987). ‘Numerical Simulation of a Fog Event with a One-Dimensional Boundary Layer Model’. Mon. Wea. Rev. 115:592–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakanishi M. (2000). ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Radiation Fog’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:461–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakanishi M. (2001). ‘Improvement of the Mellor–Yamada Turbulence Closure Model Based on Large-Eddy Simulation Data’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:349–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakanishi M. (2002). ‘A Lateral Boundary Condition Suitable for the One-Way Nesting Scheme’. Tenki 49:117–128 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Nakanishi M. and Niino H. (2004). ‘An Improved Mellor–Yamada Level-3 Model with Condensation Physics: Its Design and Verification’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smagorinsky J., Manabe S., and Holloway J.L. (1965). ‘Numerical Results from a Nine-Level General Circulation Model of the Atmosphere’. Mon. Wea. Rev. 93:727–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Defence AcademyYokosukaJapan
  2. 2.Ocean Research InstituteThe University of TokyoNakanoJapan

Personalised recommendations