Evaluation of the Urban Tile in MOSES using Surface Energy Balance Observations
The UK Met Office has introduced a new scheme for its urban tile in MOSES 2.2 (Met Office Surface Exchange Scheme version 2.2), which is currently implemented within the operational Met Office weather forecasting model. Here, the performance of the urban tile is evaluated in two urban areas: the historic core of downtown Mexico City and a light industrial site in Vancouver, Canada. The sites differ in terms of building structures and mean building heights. In both cases vegetation cover is less than 5%. The evaluation is based on surface energy balance flux measurements conducted at approximately the blending height, which is the location where the surface scheme passes flux data into the atmospheric model. At both sites, MOSES 2.2 correctly simulates the net radiation, but there are discrepancies in the partitioning of turbulent and storage heat fluxes between predicted and observed values. Of the turbulent fluxes, latent heat fluxes were underpredicted by about one order of magnitude. Multiple model runs revealed MOSES 2.2 to be sensitive to changes in the canopy heat storage and in the ratio between the aerodynamic roughness length and that for heat transfer (temperature). Model performance was optimum with heat capacity values smaller than those generally considered for these sites. The results suggest that the current scheme is probably too simple, and that improvements may be obtained by increasing the complexity of the model.
KeywordsModel evaluation Sensitivity analysis Surface scheme Urban energy balance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Best, M. J.: 1998, ‘Representing Urban Areas in Numerical Weather Prediction Models’, Second Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 148–151Google Scholar
- Best, M. J.: 2000, ‘Can We Represent Urban Areas in Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Models?’, Third Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 70–71.Google Scholar
- Best, M. J. and Clark, P. A.: 2002, ‘The Influence of Vegetation on the Urban Climate’, Fourth Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 88–89.Google Scholar
- Best, M. J.: 2005a, ‘Progress Towards Better Weather Forecasts for City Dwellers: From Short Range to Climate Change’, Theor. Appl. Climat., in press.Google Scholar
- Grimmond, C. S. B.: 2005, ‘Progress in Measuring and Observing the Urban Atmosphere’, Theor. Appl. Climat. in press.Google Scholar
- Masson V. (2000). ‘A Physically-Based Scheme for the Urban Energy Budget in Atmospheric Models’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 94:357–397Google Scholar
- Masson, V.: 2005, ‘Progress in Urban Surface Modeling and the Meso-scale Impact of Cities’, Theor. Appl. Climat. in press.Google Scholar
- Masson V., Grimmond C.S.B., and Oke T.R. (2002). ‘Evaluation of the Town Energy Balance (TEB) Scheme with Direct Measurements from Dry Districts in Two Cities’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 41:1011–1026Google Scholar
- Oke T.R., Cleugh H.A., Grimmond C.S.B., Schmid H.P., and Roth M. (1989). ‘Evaluation of Spatially-Averaged Fluxes of Heat, Mass and Momentum in the Urban Boundary Layer’. Weather Climate 9:14–21Google Scholar