Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 118, Issue 3, pp 503–525 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Urban Tile in MOSES using Surface Energy Balance Observations

  • M. J. Best
  • C. S. B. Grimmond
  • Maria Gabriella Villani
Article

Abstract

The UK Met Office has introduced a new scheme for its urban tile in MOSES 2.2 (Met Office Surface Exchange Scheme version 2.2), which is currently implemented within the operational Met Office weather forecasting model. Here, the performance of the urban tile is evaluated in two urban areas: the historic core of downtown Mexico City and a light industrial site in Vancouver, Canada. The sites differ in terms of building structures and mean building heights. In both cases vegetation cover is less than 5%. The evaluation is based on surface energy balance flux measurements conducted at approximately the blending height, which is the location where the surface scheme passes flux data into the atmospheric model. At both sites, MOSES 2.2 correctly simulates the net radiation, but there are discrepancies in the partitioning of turbulent and storage heat fluxes between predicted and observed values. Of the turbulent fluxes, latent heat fluxes were underpredicted by about one order of magnitude. Multiple model runs revealed MOSES 2.2 to be sensitive to changes in the canopy heat storage and in the ratio between the aerodynamic roughness length and that for heat transfer (temperature). Model performance was optimum with heat capacity values smaller than those generally considered for these sites. The results suggest that the current scheme is probably too simple, and that improvements may be obtained by increasing the complexity of the model.

Keywords

Model evaluation Sensitivity analysis Surface scheme Urban energy balance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnfield A.J. (2003). ‘Two Decades of Urban Climate Research: A Review of Turbulence, Exchanges of Energy and Water, and the Urban Heat Island’. Int. J. Climatol. 23:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnfield A.J. and Grimmond C.S.B. (1998). ‘An Urban Canyon Energy Budget Model and its Application to Urban Storage Heat Flux Modelling’. Energy Build. 27:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best, M. J.: 1998, ‘Representing Urban Areas in Numerical Weather Prediction Models’, Second Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 148–151Google Scholar
  4. Best, M. J.: 2000, ‘Can We Represent Urban Areas in Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Models?’, Third Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 70–71.Google Scholar
  5. Best, M. J. and Clark, P. A.: 2002, ‘The Influence of Vegetation on the Urban Climate’, Fourth Symp. Urban Environ. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 88–89.Google Scholar
  6. Best, M. J.: 2005a, ‘Progress Towards Better Weather Forecasts for City Dwellers: From Short Range to Climate Change’, Theor. Appl. Climat., in press.Google Scholar
  7. Best M.J. (2005b). ‘Representing Urban Areas Within Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Model’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 114:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Essery R.L.H., Best M.J., Betts R.A., Cox P.M., and Taylor C.M. (2003). ‘Explicit Representation of Subgrid Heterogeneity in a GCM Land Surface Scheme’. J. Hydrometeorol. 4:530–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimmond, C. S. B.: 2005, ‘Progress in Measuring and Observing the Urban Atmosphere’, Theor. Appl. Climat. in press.Google Scholar
  10. Grimmond C.S.B. and Oke T.R. (1999a). ‘Heat Storage in Urban Areas: Observations and Evaluation of a Simple Model’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 38:922–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimmond C.S.B. and Oke T.R. (1999b). ‘Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 38:1262–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimmond C.S.B. and Oke T.R. (2002). ‘Turbulent Heat Fluxes in Urban Areas: Observations and Local-Scale Urban Meteorological Parameterization Scheme (LUMPS)’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 41:792–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harman I.N., Best M.J. and Belcher S.E. (2004). ‘Radiative Exchange in an Urban street Canyon’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 110:301–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herbert J.M., Johnson G.T., and Arnfield A.J. (1998). ‘Modelling the Thermal Climate in City Canyons’. Environ. Model. Software 13:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemonsu A., Grimmond C.S.B., and Masson V. (2004). ‘Modelling the Surface Energy Balance of an old Mediterranean city core’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 43:312–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martilli A., Clappier A., and Rotach M.W. (2002). ‘An Urban Surface Exchange Parameterisation for Mesoscale Models’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 104:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Masson V. (2000). ‘A Physically-Based Scheme for the Urban Energy Budget in Atmospheric Models’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 94:357–397Google Scholar
  18. Masson, V.: 2005, ‘Progress in Urban Surface Modeling and the Meso-scale Impact of Cities’, Theor. Appl. Climat. in press.Google Scholar
  19. Masson V., Grimmond C.S.B., and Oke T.R. (2002). ‘Evaluation of the Town Energy Balance (TEB) Scheme with Direct Measurements from Dry Districts in Two Cities’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 41:1011–1026Google Scholar
  20. Mills G. (1997). ‘The Radiative Effects of Building Groups on Single Structures’. Energy Build 25:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oke T.R. (1988). ‘The Urban energy Balance’. Prog. Physical Geog. 12:471–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oke T.R., Cleugh H.A., Grimmond C.S.B., Schmid H.P., and Roth M. (1989). ‘Evaluation of Spatially-Averaged Fluxes of Heat, Mass and Momentum in the Urban Boundary Layer’. Weather Climate 9:14–21Google Scholar
  23. Oke T.R., Spronken-Smith R., Jauregui E., and Grimmond C.S.B. (1999). ‘Recent Energy Balance Observations in Mexico City’. Atmos. Environ 33:3919–3930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plate E.J. (1999). ‘Methods of Investigating Urban Wind Fields – Physical Models’. Atmos. Environ 33:3981–3989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prata A.J. (1996). ‘A new Longwave Formula for Estimating Downward Clear-sky Radiation at the Surface’. Quart. J. Roy Meteorol. Soc. 122:1127–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmid H.P. (1994). ‘Source Areas for Scalars and Scalar Fluxes’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 67:293–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Voogt J.A. and Grimmond C.S.B. (2000). ‘Modeling Surface Sensible Heat Flux Using Surface Radiative Temperatures in a Simple Urban Area’. J. Appl. Meteorol 39:1679–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Best
    • 1
  • C. S. B. Grimmond
    • 2
  • Maria Gabriella Villani
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Centre for Hydro-Meteorological ResearchMet OfficeWallingfordU.K
  2. 2.Atmospheric Science Program, Department of GeographyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonU.S.A
  3. 3.ISAC – CNRBolognaItaly
  4. 4.Environmental Science FacultyUniversity of UrbinoUrbinoItaly

Personalised recommendations