Biomedical Microdevices

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 187–191 | Cite as

Masking apertures enabling automation and solution exchange in sessile droplet lipid bilayers

Article

Abstract

Reconstitution of ion channels and transmembrane proteins in planar lipid bilayer membranes allow for their scientific study in highly controlled environments. Recent work with lipid bilayers formed from mechanically joined monolayers has shown their potential for wider technological application, including automation and parallelization. However, bilayer areas are highly sensitive to variations in mechanical position and the bilayers themselves cannot withstand significant perfusion of adjacent solutions. Toward this end, here we describe use of an aperture that masks the monolayer contact area, enabling formation of highly consistent bilayer areas and significantly reducing their variation with changes in relative position of the monolayers. Further, use of the aperture enables flow of solution adjacent to the bilayer without rupture or significant change in bilayer area. The device design is scalable and compatible with SBS standard instrumentation and automation technology, potentially enabling its use for rapid, parallel automated measurements of ion channels for large scale scientific studies and pharmaceutical screening.

Keywords

Lipid bilayer Ion channel Automation Fluid exchange 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Takashi Nisisako for assistance with fluid exchange experiments, Dr. Jason L. Poulos for chamber design contributions, and Ahmad El-Arabi for assistance in producing manuscript figures. Funding provided by National Science Foundation CAREER (0644442).

Supplementary material

10544_2011_9596_MOESM1_ESM.doc (50 kb)
Supplemental Figure Masking apertures increase tolerance of bilayers to flow of adjacent solution. Bilayer capacitance is measured as a function of flow rate of the buffer in the lower aqueous chamber. Data shown from two separate trials forming bilayers on a 200 μm diameter aperture. Without the masking aperture, bilayer failure was immediate even for flow rates < 1 ml/hr. (DOC 49.5 kb)

References

  1. H. Bayley, B. Cronin, A. Heron, M.A. Holden, W. Hwang, R. Syeda, J. Thompson, M. Wallace, Mol. Biosyst. 4, 1191–1208 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Funakoshi, H. Suzuki, S. Takeuchi, Anal. Chem. 78, 8169–74 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. A.J. Heron, J.R. Thompson, A.E. Mason, M.I. Wallace, J. Am, Chem. Soc. 129, 16042–16047 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M.A. Holden, D. Needham, H. Bayley, J. Am, Chem. Soc. 129, 8650–5 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Leptihn, J.R. Thompson, J.C. Ellory, S.J. Tucker, M.I. Wallace, J. Am, Chem. Soc. 133, 9370–9375 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Malmstadt, M.A. Nash, R.F. Purnell, J.J. Schmidt, Nano Letters 6, 1961–1965 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Mayer, J.K. Kriebel, M.T. Tosteson, G.M. Whitesides, Biophysical Journal 85, 2684–2695 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. J.L. Poulos, T.J. Jeon, R. Damoiseaux, E.J. Gillespie, K.A. Bradley, J.J. Schmidt, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 1806–10 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J.L. Poulos, S.A. Portonovo, H. Bang, J.J. Schmidt, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 454105 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Thapliyal, J.L. Poulos, J.J. Schmidt, Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 2651–2654 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. L.M. Tsofina, E.A. Liberman, A.V. Babakov, Nature 212, 681–3 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. W.F. Wonderlin, A. Finkel, R.J. French, Biophys. J. 58, 289–297 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Zagnoni, M.E. Sandison, P. Marius, H. Morgan, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 1601–1605 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.California Nanosystems Institute (CNSI)University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations