Biomedical Microdevices

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 135–144 | Cite as

Tape underlayment rotary-node (TURN) valves for simple on-chip microfluidic flow control

  • Dmitry A. Markov
  • Steven Manuel
  • Leslie M. Shor
  • Susan R. Opalenik
  • John P. Wikswo
  • Philip C. Samson
Article

Abstract

We describe a simple and reliable fabrication method for producing multiple, manually activated microfluidic control valves in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) devices. These screwdriver-actuated valves reside directly on the microfluidic chip and can provide both simple on/off operation as well as graded control of fluid flow. The fabrication procedure can be easily implemented in any soft lithography lab and requires only two specialized tools—a hot-glue gun and a machined brass mold. To facilitate use in multi-valve fluidic systems, the mold is designed to produce a linear tape that contains a series of plastic rotary nodes with small stainless steel machine screws that form individual valves which can be easily separated for applications when only single valves are required. The tape and its valves are placed on the surface of a partially cured thin PDMS microchannel device while the PDMS is still on the soft-lithographic master, with the master providing alignment marks for the tape. The tape is permanently affixed to the microchannel device by pouring an over-layer of PDMS, to form a full-thickness device with the tape as an enclosed underlayment. The advantages of these Tape Underlayment Rotary-Node (TURN) valves include parallel fabrication of multiple valves, low risk of damaging a microfluidic device during valve installation, high torque, elimination of stripped threads, the capabilities of TURN hydraulic actuators, and facile customization of TURN molds. We have utilized these valves to control microfluidic flow, to control the onset of molecular diffusion, and to manipulate channel connectivity. Practical applications of TURN valves include control of loading and chemokine release in chemotaxis assay devices, flow in microfluidic bioreactors, and channel connectivity in microfluidic devices intended to study competition and predator/prey relationships among microbes.

Keywords

Microfluidics On-chip valve Flow control Gradient formation Bacteria Protozoa Microbiological predation Valve fabrication Hydraulic valve Valve arrays Multi-channel closure 

References

  1. T.H. Anderson, K.H. Domsch, in Soil structure: its development and function, ed. by K.H. Hartge, A. Bobby (CRC, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 1995), p. 325Google Scholar
  2. D.J. Beebe, G.A. Mensing, G.M. Walker, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Engr. 4, 261 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. B.S. Cho, T.G. Schuster, X.Y. Zhu, D. Chang, G.D. Smith, S. Takayama, Anal. Chem. 75, 1671 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D.C. Duffy, J.C. McDonald, O.J.A. Schueller, G.M. Whitesides, Anal. Chem. 70, 4974 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. C.J. Easley, J.M. Karlinsey, J.M. Bienvenue, L.A. Legendre, M.G. Roper, S.H. Feldman, M.A. Hughes, E.L. Hewlett, T.J. Merkel, J.P. Ferrance, J.P. Landers, PNAS. 103, 19272 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Fenchel, Ophelia. 6, 1 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. W. Georgescu, J. Jourquin, L. Estrada, A.R.A. Anderson, V. Quaranta, J.P. Wikswo, Lab Chip. 8, 238 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. I.A. Ges, F.J. Baudenbacher, J. Exp. Nanosci. 3, 63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. I.A. Ges, I.A. Dzhura, F.J. Baudenbacher, Biomed. Microdevices. 10, 347 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R.N. Glud, T. Fenchel, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 186, 87 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Gomez-Sjoberg, A.A. Leyrat, D.M. Pirone, C.S. Chen, S.R. Quake, Anal. Chem. 79, 8557 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. W.H. Grover, A.M. Skelley, C.N. Liu, E.T. Lagally, R.A. Mathies, Sens. Act. B. 89, 315 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Gu, X. Zhu, N. Futai, B.S. Cho, S. Takayama, PNAS. 101, 15861 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. M.W. Hahn, M.G. Hofle, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 35, 113 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. G.T.A. Kovacs, Micromachined transducers sourcebook (WCB, Boston, 1998), pp. 823–838Google Scholar
  16. Y. Liu, J.G. Sai, A. Richmond, J.P. Wikswo, Biomed. Microdevices. 10, 499 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. E.L. Madsen, J.L. Sinclair, W.C. Ghiorse, Science. 252, 830 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R.G. Mattison, H. Taki, S. Harayama, Microb. Ecol. 49, 142 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Prokop, Z. Prokop, D. Schaffer, E. Kozlov, J.P. Wikswo, D. Cliffel, F. Baudenbacher, Biomed. Microdevices. 6, 325 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Ranjard, A.S. Richaume, Res. Microbiol. 152, 707 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Rogerson, J. Berger, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 41 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Thorsen, S.J. Maerkl, S.R. Quake, Science. 298, 580 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. S.F. Tso, G.L. Taghon, Microb. Ecol. 51, 460 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. M.A. Unger, H.P. Chou, T. Thorsen, A. Scherer, S.R. Quake, Science. 288, 113 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. G.M. Walker, J. Sai, A. Richmond, M.A. Stremler, C.Y. Chung, J.P. Wikswo, Lab Chip. 5, 611 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. W. Wang, L.M. Shor, E.J. LeBoeuf, J.P. Wikswo, D.S. Kosson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4628 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Wang, L.M. Shor, E.J. LeBoeuf, J.P. Wikswo, G.L. Taghon, D.S. Kosson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 1945 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. D.B. Weibel, M. Kruithof, S. Potenta, S.K. Sia, A. Lee, G.M. Whitesides, Anal. Chem. 77, 4726 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. A. Werdich, E.A. Lima, B. Ivanov, I. Ges, J.P. Wikswo, F.J. Baudenbacher, Lab Chip. 4, 357 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. G.M. Whitesides, E. Ostuni, S. Takayama, X. Jiang, D.E. Ingber, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Engr. 3, 335 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry A. Markov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Steven Manuel
    • 2
    • 3
  • Leslie M. Shor
    • 4
    • 5
  • Susan R. Opalenik
    • 2
    • 6
  • John P. Wikswo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 7
    • 8
  • Philip C. Samson
    • 2
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
  2. 2.Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and EducationVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory for Intelligent Mechanical SystemsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Chemical, Materials and Biomolecular EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  5. 5.Center for Environmental Science and EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  6. 6.Department of PathologyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  7. 7.Department of Physics and AstronomyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  8. 8.Department of Molecular Physiology and BiophysicsVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations