Quantifying tumor-selective radiation dose enhancements using gold nanoparticles: a monte carlo simulation study
- 645 Downloads
Gold nanoparticles can enhance the biological effective dose of radiation delivered to tumors, but few data exist to quantify this effect. The purpose of this project was to build a Monte Carlo simulation model to study the degree of dose enhancement achievable with gold nanoparticles. A Monte Carlo simulation model was first built using Geant4 code. An Ir-192 brachytherapy source in a water phantom was simulated and the calculation model was first validated against previously published data. We then introduced up to 1013 gold nanospheres per cm3 into the water phantom and examined their dose enhancement effect. We compared this enhancement against a gold-water mixture model that has been previously used to attempt to quantify nanoparticle dose enhancement. In our benchmark test, dose-rate constant, radial dose function, and two-dimensional anisotropy function calculated with our model were within 2% of those reported previously. Using our simulation model we found that the radiation dose was enhanced up to 60% with 1013 gold nanospheres per cm3 (9.6% by weight) in a water phantom selectively around the nanospheres. The comparison study indicated that our model more accurately calculated the dose enhancement effect and that previous methodologies overestimated the dose enhancement up to 16%. Monte Carlo calculations demonstrate that biologically-relevant radiation dose enhancement can be achieved with the use of gold nanospheres. Selective tumor labeling with gold nanospheres may be a strategy for clinically enhancing radiation effects.
KeywordsNanoparticle Dose enhancement Monte Carlo simulation modeling
Conflict of interest
The authors are unaware of any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may exist.
- K. Bullis, Remotely activated nanoparticles destroy cancer. Technology Review 2007. http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/17956/. Published January 2, 2007. Accessed November 25, 2007
- S.J. Douglas, S.S. Davis, L. Illum, Nanoparticles in drug delivery. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 3, 133–161 (1987)Google Scholar
- K.L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L.L. Zhao et al., The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: The influences of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B Condens Matter Mater Surf Interfaces Biophys 107, 668–677 (2003)Google Scholar
- C. Noguez, Surface plasmons on metal nanoparticles: The influence of shape and physical environment. J. Phys. Chem. C. Nanomaterials Interfaces 111, 3806–3819 (2007)Google Scholar
- NuDat 2.4. National Nuclear Data Center. Nuclear data from NuDat, a web-based database maintained by the National Nuclear Data Center. Upton, NY, USA: Brookhaven National Laboratory; http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2. Accessed November 25, 2007
- Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology., Stopping-power and range tables for electrons. http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/ESTAR.html . Accessed November 25, 2007
- J.H. Sakamoto, B.R. Smith, B. Xie et al., The molecular analysis of breast cancer utilized targeted nanoparticle based ultrasound contrast agents. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4, 627–636 (2005)Google Scholar
- G. Schmid, Nanoparticles: from theory to application (Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; Weinheim, Germany, 2004)Google Scholar
- X-5 Monte Carlo Team, MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5. LA-UR-03-1987. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, 2004Google Scholar