Fabrication and physical evaluation of a polymer-encapsulated paramagnetic probe for biomedical oximetry
- 152 Downloads
- 15 Citations
Abstract
Lithium octa-n-butoxynaphthalocyanine (LiNc-BuO) is a promising probe for biological electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry and is being developed for clinical use. However, clinical applicability of LiNc-BuO may be hindered by potential limitations associated with biocompatibility, biodegradation, and migration of individual crystals in tissue. To overcome these limitations, we have encapsulated LiNc-BuO crystals in polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS), an oxygen-permeable and bioinert polymer, to fabricate conveniently implantable and retrievable oxygen-sensing chips. Encapsulation was performed by a simple cast-molding process, giving appreciable control over size, shape, thickness and spin density of chips. The in vitro oxygen response of the chip was linear, reproducible, and not significantly different from that of unencapsulated crystals. Cast-molding of the structurally-flexible PDMS enabled the fabrication of chips with tailored spin densities, and ensured non-exposure of embedded LiNc-BuO, mitigating potential biocompatibility/toxicological concerns. Our results establish PDMS-encapsulated LiNc-BuO as a promising candidate for further biological evaluation and potential clinical application.
Keywords
EPR oximetry Oxygen sensor Particulate probe Encapsulation Polymer coating Biocompatible EPR probeNotes
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant EB004031. We would like to thank Daniel Iscru and Gunjan Agarwal at the AFM core lab, Ohio State University Medical Center for AFM data acquisition and roughness analysis.
References
- F. Abbasi, H. Mirzadeh, A.A. Katbab, Polym. Int 50(12), 1279–1287 (2001). doi: 10.1002/pi.783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- C. Baudelet, R. Ansiaux, B.F. Jordan, X. Havaux, B. Macq, B. Gallez, Phys. Med. Biol 49, 3389–3411 (2004). doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/15/006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M.C. Belanger, Y. Marois, J. Biomed. Mater. Res 58(5), 467–477 (2001). doi: 10.1002/jbm.1043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- K.G. Brurberg, B.A. Graff, D.R. Olsen, E.K. Rofstad, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 58(2), 403–409 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.049 Google Scholar
- K.G. Brurberg, B.A. Graff, E.K. Rofstad, Br. J. Cancer 89(2), 350–356 (2003). doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A. Dinguizli, S. Jeumont, N. Beghein, J. He, T. Walczak, P.N. Lesniewski, H. Hou, O.Y. Grinberg, A. Sucheta, H.M. Swartz, B. Gallez, Biosens. Bioelectron 21(7), 1015–1022 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M. Dinguizli, N. Beghein, B. Gallez, Physiol. Meas 29(11), 1247–1254 (2008). doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J.F. Dunn, H.M. Swartz, Methods 30(2), 159–166 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00077-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- E. Eteshola, R.P. Pandian, S.C. Lee, P. Kuppusamy, Biomed. Microdevices, (Epub ahead of print) (2009)Google Scholar
- B. Gallez, B.F. Jordan, C. Baudelet, Magn. Res. Med. 42(1), 193–196 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- B. Gallez, K. Mader, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 29(11), 1078–1084 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J. He, N. Beghein, P. Ceroke, R.B. Clarkson, H.M. Swartz, B. Gallez, Magn. Res. Med. 46(3), 610–614 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- H.W. Hopf, M.D. Rollins, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(8), 1183–1192 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- G. Ilangovan, A. Manivannan, H.Q. Li, H. Yanagi, J.L. Zweier, P. Kuppusamy, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 32(2), 139–147 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- N. Khan, B.B. Williams, H. Hou, H. Li, H.M. Swartz, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(8), 1169–1182 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A.C. Kulkarni, P. Kuppusamy, N. Parinandi, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(10), 1717–1730 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- V.K. Kutala, N.L. Parinandi, R.P. Pandian, P. Kuppusamy, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 6(3), 597–603 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- V.K. Kutala, M. Khan, M.G. Angelos, P. Kuppusamy, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(8), 1193–1206 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- K.J. Liu, P. Gast, M. Moussavi, S.W. Norby, N. Vahidi, T. Walczak, M. Wu, H.M. Swartz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90(12), 5438–5442 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- S.P. Marso, W.R. Hiatt, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(5), 921–929 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A. Mata, A.J. Fleischman, S. Roy, Biomed. Microdevices 7(4), 281–293 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R.P. Pandian, V.K. Kutala, N.L. Parinandi, J.L. Zweier, P. Kuppusamy, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 420(1), 169–175 (2003a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R.P. Pandian, N.L. Parinandi, G. Ilangovan, J.L. Zweier, P. Kuppusamy, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 35(9), 1138–1148 (2003b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R.P. Pandian, Y.I. Kim, P.M. Woodward, J.L. Zweier, P.T. Manoharan, P. Kuppusamy, J. Mater. Chem. 16(36), 3609–3618 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R. Springett, H.M. Swartz, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(8), 1295–1301 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- H.M. Swartz, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 6(3), 677–686 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- P. Vaupel, M. Hockel, A. Mayer, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(8), 1221–1235 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- D.S. Vikram, J.L. Zweier, P. Kuppusamy, Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 9(10), 1745–1756 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- D.S. Vikram, R. Ahmad, R.P. Pandian, S. Petryakov, P. Kuppusamy, J. Magn. Res. 193(1), 127–132 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- S. Wisel, S.M. Chacko, M.L. Kuppusamy, R.P. Pandian, M. Khan, V.K. Kutala, R.W. Burry, B. Sun, P. Kwiatkowski, P. Kuppusamy, am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 292(3), H1254–H1261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar