Biomimetic hydrogels for biosensor implant biocompatibility: electrochemical characterization using micro-disc electrode arrays (MDEAs)
- 625 Downloads
Our interest is in the development of engineered microdevices for continuous remote monitoring of intramuscular lactate, glucose, pH and temperature during post-traumatic hemorrhaging. Two important design considerations in the development of such devices for in vivo diagnostics are discussed; the utility of micro-disc electrode arrays (MDEAs) for electrochemical biosensing and the application of biomimetic, bioactive poly(HEMA)-based hydrogel composites for implant biocompatibility. A poly(HEMA)-based hydrogel membrane containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) was UV cross-linked with tetraethyleneglycol diacrylate following application to MDEAs (50 μm discs) and to 250 μm diameter gold electrodes within 8-well culture ware. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the MDEAs revealed a reduction in the apparent diffusion coefficient of ferrocenemonocarboxylic acid (FcCO2H), from 6.68 × 10−5 to 6.74 × 10−6 cm2/s for the uncoated and 6 μm thick hydrogel coated devices, respectively. Single frequency (4 kHz) temporal impedance measurements of the hydrogels in the 8-well culture ware showed a reversible 5% change in the absolute impedance of the hydrogels when exposed to a pH change between 6.1 to 7.2 and a 20% drop between pH 6.1 and 8.8.
KeywordsBiotransducers Implantable biosensors Integrated circuits Arrays Electroanalysis
This work was supported by the US Department of Defense (DoDPRMRP) grant PR023081/DAMD17-03-1-0172 and by the Consortium of the Clemson University Center for Bioelectronics, Biosensors and Biochips (C3B).
- Abdur Rub Abdur Rahman, Gusphyl Justin and Anthony Guiseppi-Elie “Towards an Implantable Biochip for Glucose and Lactate Monitoring using Micro-Disc Electrode Arrays (MDEAs)” “Biomedical Microdevices: BioMEMS and Biomedical NanoTechnology” (this journal)Google Scholar
- A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edn. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2001)Google Scholar
- U. Bhardwaj, R. Sura, F. Papadimitrakopoulos, D.J. Burgess, Controlling acute inflammation with fast releasing dexamethasone-PLGA microsphere/PVA hydrogel composites for implantable devices J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 1, 8–17 (2007)Google Scholar
- R.H. Farahi, R.H. Farahi, T.L. Ferrell, A. Guiseppi-Elie, P.A.H.P. Hansen, “Integrated electronics platforms for wireless implantable biosensors” presented at Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop, 2007. LISA 2007. IEEE/NIH, 2007Google Scholar
- F. Moussy, D. Harrison, R. Rajotte, A miniaturized Nafion-based glucose sensor: in vivo evaluation in dogs Int. J. Artif. Organs 17, 88–94 (1994)Google Scholar
- Y. Saito, Rev Polarog (Japan), vol. 15, pp. 177 (1968)Google Scholar
- O. Schuvailo, O. Soldatkin, A. Lefebvre, R. Cespuglio, and A. Soldatkin, Highly selective microbiosensors for in vivo measurement of glucose, lactate and glutamate. Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. Epub 110-6, pp. 573–574, (2006)Google Scholar
- J. Vincent, Lactate and biochemical indexes of oxygenation, in Principles and Practice of Intensive Care Monitoring, ed. by M. Tobin (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998)Google Scholar